Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Contemporary Adult Diabetes Mellitus Management Perceptions

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Over 180 million people have been diagnosed with diabetes mellitus worldwide, with this number expected to more than double by 2030. Due to the increasing mortality and morbidity associated with this epidemic, the improved primary-care management of diabetes during routine office visits remains an emerging international challenge.

Objective: To report the results of a series of exploratory semi-structured group interview sessions with a sample of 44 American adults with type 2 diabetes, concerning their diabetes management perceptions and office-based diabetes care processes.

Methods: A total of 44 adults from a Midwest Internal Medicine Clinic were interviewed during 2004 and 2005 before starting a larger, quantitative, shared decision-making intervention study. During group interviews, participants offered their perceptions of their self-management practices, interactions with office clinicians, and diabetes-related health outcomes to date. A total of 178 audio-taped interview comments (across 44 participants) were transcribed and analyzed for core themes and sub-themes.

Results: Many participants reported frustrating experiences regarding the relationship between their personal diabetes self-management practices and typical office visit interactions with clinicians. Most participants perceived these diabetes management processes as inherently different from each other. Many participants were intrigued with the proposed shared decision-making management approach of the larger intervention study.

Conclusions: Primary-care clinicians should assess how patients may perceive their self-management strategies relate to office-based diabetes care processes. Patients’ self-management beliefs and practices should be routinely evaluated since they frequently affect the nature of key diabetes care office visit decisions. These qualitative results suggest that clinicians should convey the increasing interdependence between their patients’ daily diabetes self-management practices and contemporary office visit decision-making discussions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Fig. 1
Table II

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization. Diabetes: 2009 fact sheet no. 312 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs312/en/index.html [Accessed 2009 Jun 10]

  2. Nicolucci A, Greenfield S, Mattke S. Selecting indicators for the quality of diabetes care at the health systems level in OECD countries. Int J Qual Health Care 2006; 18: 26–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Peyrot M, Rubin RR, Lauritzen T, et al. Patient and provider perceptions of care for diabetes: results of the cross-national DAWN study. Diabetologia 2006; 49: 279–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vermiere E, Wens J, Van Royen P, et al. Interventions for improving adherence to treatment recommendations in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005 Apr 18; (2): CD003638

  5. Jennings S, Whitford DI, Carey D, et al. Structuring diabetes care in general practices: many improvements, remaining challenges. Ir J Med Sci 2007; 175: 42–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Renders CM, Valk GD, Griffin S, et al. Interventions to improve the management of diabetes mellitus in primary care, outpatient, and community settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; (1): CD001481

  7. World Health Organization. The Innovative Care for Chronic Conditions framework (ICCC) [online]. Available from URL: http://www.who.int/diabetesactiononline/about/ICCC/en/index.html [Accessed 2009 Jun 10]

  8. Polonsky WH. Emotional and quality-of-life aspects of diabetes management. Curr Diab Rep 2002; 2: 1539–4827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hills-Briggs F, Copper DC, Loman FL, et al. A qualitative study of problem solving and diabetes control in type 2 diabetes self-management. Diabetes Educ 2003; 29: 1018–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Glasgow RE, Toobert DJ, Gillette C. Psychosocial barriers to diabetes self-management and quality of life. Diabetes Spectrum 2001; 14: 33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Montori VM, Gafni A, Charles C. A shared treatment decision-making approach between patients with chronic conditions and their clinicians: the case for diabetes. Health Expect 2006; 9(1): 25–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Spann SJ, Nutting PA, Galliher JM, et al. Management of type 2 diabetes in the primary care setting: a practice-based research network study. Ann Fam Med 2006; 4: 23–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fox J. The role of the expert patient in the management of chronic illness. Br J Nurs 2005; 14: 25–28

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tattersall R. The expert patient: a new approach to chronic disease management for the twenty-first century. Clin Med 2002; 2(3): 227–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Corser WD, Holmes-Rovner M, Gossain V, et al. Results from a ‘shared decision-making’ primary care intervention for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ 2007; 33: 700–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Saba GW, Wong ST, Schillinger D, et al. Shared decision-making and the experience of partnership in primary care. Ann Fam Med 2006; 4: 54–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cabrera-Pivaral CE, Gonzalez-Perez G, Vega-Lopez G, et al. Effect of behavior-modifying education in the metabolic profile of the type 2 diabetes mellitus patient. J Diabetes Complicat 2000; 14: 322–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fisher L. Family relationships and diabetes care during the adult years. Diabetes Spectrum 2006; 19: 71–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Holmstrom IM, Rosenqvist U. Misunderstandings about illness and treatment among patients with type 2 diabetes. J Adv Nurs 2005; 49: 146–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jack L, Liburd L, Spencer T, et al. Understanding the environmental issues in diabetes self-management education research: a reexamination of eight studies in community-based settings. Ann Int Med 2004; 140: 964–71

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Alzari MH, Neal ED. The association between satisfaction with services provided in primary care and outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med 2003; 20: 486–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Parchman ML, Romero RL, Pugh JA. Encounters by patients with type 2 diabetes-complex and demanding: an observational study. Ann Fam Med 2006; 4: 40–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nagelkerk J, Reick K, Meengs L. Perceived barriers and effective strategies to diabetes self-management. J Adv Nurs 2006; 5: 151–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Corser WD, Xu Y. Facilitating patients’ diabetes self-management: a primary care intervention framework. J Nurs Care Qual 2009; 24(2): 172–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Corser WD. The perceptions of older veterans concerning their post-discharge outcome experiences. Appl Nurs Res 2006; 19: 63–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Smith RC, Lein C, Collins C, et al. Treating patients with medically unexplained symptoms in primary care. J Gen Int Med 2003; 18: 478–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Krippendorff K. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Newbury Park (NJ): Sage Publications, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  28. Silverman D. Interpreting qualitative data: methods for analyzing talk, text, and interaction. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  29. Naithani S, Gulliford M, Morgan M. Patients’ perceptions and experiences of ‘continuity of care’ in diabetes. Health Expect 2006; 9: 118–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Edwall LL, Hellstrom AL, Ohrn I, et al. The lived experience of the diabetes nurse specialist regular check-ups, as narrated by patients with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Nurs 2008; 17: 772–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Funnell MM, Brown T, Childs BP, et al. National standards for diabetes self-management education. Diabetes Educ 2007; 33: 599–614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mulcahy K, Maryniuk M, Peeples M, et al. Diabetes self-management education core outcomes measures. Diabetes Educ 2003; 29: 768–800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lein C, Wills CE. Using patient-centered interviewing skills to manage complex patient encounters in primary care. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2007; 19: 215–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William Corser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Corser, W., Lein, C., Holmes-Rovner, M. et al. Contemporary Adult Diabetes Mellitus Management Perceptions. Patient-Patient-Centered-Outcome-Res 3, 101–111 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2165/11318450-000000000-00000

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11318450-000000000-00000

Keywords

Navigation