Skip to main content
Log in

Cost-Effectiveness of Dapagliflozin as Add-On to Metformin for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Greece

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Clinical Drug Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Objective

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic progressive disease that has been spread worldwide over the past three decades and associated with increased morbidity and mortality resulting in considerable socioeconomic implications for national healthcare systems. Effective management of disease is highly needed ensuring patients receive the best possible care within the available budget. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin, a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor, compared with a sulfonylurea (SU) or a dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i), when added to metformin, in T2DM patients inadequately controlled on metformin alone in Greece.

Methods

The published and validated Cardiff diabetes model, a lifetime micro-simulation model, was adapted to a Greek healthcare setting to determine the incidence of micro- and macro-vascular complications and diabetes-specific and all-cause mortality. Clinical, cost, and utility data were retrieved from literature and assigned to model parameters to calculate total quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and total costs as well as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). The analysis was conducted from the perspective of a third-party payer in Greece. Uncertainty surrounding important model parameters was explored with univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA).

Results

Over a patient’s lifetime, dapagliflozin was associated with 0.48 and 0.04 incremental QALYs compared with SU and DPP-4i, respectively, at additional costs of €5142 and €756, respectively. The corresponding ICERs were €10,623 and €17,695 per QALY gained versus the treatment with SU and DPP-4i, respectively. Results were robust across various univariate and scenario analyses. At the defined willingness-to-pay threshold of €34,000 per QALY gained, PSA estimated that treatment with dapagliflozin had a 100 % and 79.7 % probability of being cost-effective relative to the SU and DPP-4i treatments.

Conclusions

Dapagliflozin in combination with metformin was shown to be a cost-effective treatment alternative for patients with T2DM whose metformin regimen does not provide sufficient glycemic control in a Greek healthcare setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gikas A, Sotiropoulos A, Panagiotakos D, et al. Rising prevalence of diabetes among Greek adults: findings from two consecutive surveys in the same target population. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008;79:325–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Migdalis I, Rombopoulos G, Hatzikou M, et al. The cost of managing type 2 diabetes mellitus in Greece: a retrospective analysis of 10-year patient level data “The HERCULES Study”. Int J Endocrinol. 2015;2015:7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach: position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2012;35:1364–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Hellenic Diabetes Association. Management guidelines for a diabetic patient. Available from: http://www.ede.gr/. Accessed 15 Sept 2015.

  5. Hasan FM, Alsahli M, Gerich JE. SGLT2 inhibitors in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;104:297–322.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McEwan P, Evans M, Bergenheim K. A population model evaluating the costs and benefits associated with different oral treatment strategies in people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2010;12:623–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. The Mount Hood, 4 Modeling Group. Computer modeling of diabetes and its complications: a report on the Fourth Mount Hood Challenge Meeting. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:1638–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Palmer AJ, Clarke P, Gray A, et al. Computer modeling of diabetes and its complications: a report on the Fifth Mount Hood challenge meeting. Value Health. 2013;16:670–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Clarke PM, Gray AM, Briggs A, et al. A model to estimate the lifetime health outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes: the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Outcomes Model (UKPDS no. 68). Diabetologia. 2004;47:1747–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hayes AJ, Leal J, Gray AM, et al. UKPDS outcomes model 2: a new version of a model to simulate lifetime health outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using data from the 30 year United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study: UKPDS 82. Diabetologia. 2013;56:1925–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McEwan P, Ward T, Bennett H, et al. Validation of the UKPDS 82 risk equations within the Cardiff Diabetes Model. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2015;13:12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. World Health Organization (WHO). Greece life tables. Available from: http://apps.who.int/gho/data/view.main.60640. Accessed 12 Sept 2015.

  13. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. April 2013. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/article/pmg9/chapter/Foreword. Accessed 12 Sept 2015.

  14. Nauck MA, Del Prato S, Meier JJ, et al. Dapagliflozin versus glipizide as add-on therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes who have inadequate glycemic control with metformin: a randomized, 52-week, double-blind, active-controlled noninferiority trial. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:2015–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Barnett AH, Orme ME, Fenici P, et al. Systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare dapagliflozin with other diabetes medications in combination with metformin for adults with type 2 diabetes. Intern Med. 2014;S6:S6–006.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Goring S, Hawkins N, Wygant G, et al. Dapagliflozin compared with other oral anti-diabetes treatments when added to metformin monotherapy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014;16:433–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Liatis S, Thomakos P, Papaoikonomou S, et al. Trends in the management of type 2 diabetes and its prescription drug costs in Greece (1998 and 2006). Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2009;117:505–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Monami M, Marchionni N, Mannucci E. Long-acting insulin analogues versus NPH human insulin in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008;81:184–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Charokopou M, McEwan P, Lister S, et al. The cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin versus sulfonylurea as an add-on to metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 2015;32:890–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Charokopou M, McEwan P, Lister S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin versus DPP-4 inhibitors as an add-on to metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus from a UK Healthcare System perspective. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:496.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Sabale U, Ekman M, Granstrom O, et al. Cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin (Forxiga(R)) added to metformin compared with sulfonylurea added to metformin in type 2 diabetes in the Nordic countries. Prim Care Diabetes. 2015;9:39–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. van Haalen HG, Pompen M, Bergenheim K, et al. Cost effectiveness of adding dapagliflozin to insulin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Netherlands. Clin Drug Investig. 2014;34:135–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nauck MA, Del Prato S, Duran-Garcia S, et al. Durability of glycaemic efficacy over 2 years with dapagliflozin versus glipizide as add-on therapies in patients whose type 2 diabetes mellitus is inadequately controlled with metformin. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014;16:1111–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Del Prato S, Nauck M, Duran-Garcia S, et al. Long-term glycaemic response and tolerability of dapagliflozin versus a sulphonylurea as add-on therapy to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: 4-year data. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015;17:581–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Greek Ministry of Health. Drug price bulletin. Available from: http://www.moh.gov.gr/. Accessed 10 June 2015.

  26. National Organization for Healthcare Services Provision [EOPYY] official website. Available from: www.eopyy.gov.gr. Accessed 10 June 2015.

  27. Government Gazette. Common Ministerial Decree. FEK 1561B’/21-06-2013.

  28. Tzanetakos C, Melidonis A, Verras C, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of liraglutide versus sitagliptin or exenatide in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes on oral antidiabetic drugs in Greece. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:419.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Papazafiropoulou AK, Kardara MS, Bousboulas S, Pappas SI. Cost of hospitalization for hypoglycemia among subjects with type 2 diabetes. Arch Hell Med. 2013;30:628–9.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Clarke P, Gray A, Holman R. Estimating utility values for health states of type 2 diabetic patients using the EQ-5D (UKPDS 62). Med Decis Making. 2002;22:340–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Waugh N, Cummins E, Royle P, et al. Newer agents for blood glucose control in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2010;14:1–248.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Granstrom O, Bergenheim K, McEwan P, et al. Cost-effectiveness of saxagliptin (Onglyza(R)) in type 2 diabetes in Sweden. Prim Care Diabetes. 2012;6:127–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Palmer AJ, Roze S, Valentine WJ, et al. The CORE Diabetes Model: Projecting long-term clinical outcomes, costs and cost-effectiveness of interventions in diabetes mellitus (types 1 and 2) to support clinical and reimbursement decision-making. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004;20(Suppl 1):S5–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bagust A, Beale S. Modelling EuroQol health-related utility values for diabetic complications from CODE-2 data. Health Econ. 2005;14:217–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lane S, Levy AR, Mukherjee J, et al. The impact on utilities of differences in body weight among Canadian patients with type 2 diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014;30:1267–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. World Health Organization (WHO). Choosing interventions that are Cost Effective (WHO-CHOICE): Cost-effectiveness thresholds. Available from: http://www.who.int/choice/en/. Accessed 15 Sept 2015.

  37. International Monetary Fund (IMF). World Economic Outlook Database. Available from: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2012/02/weodata/index.aspx. Accessed 15 Sept 2015.

  38. Calvert MJ, McManus RJ, Freemantle N. Management of type 2 diabetes with multiple oral hypoglycaemic agents or insulin in primary care: retrospective cohort study. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57:455–60.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Fox KM, Gerber Pharmd RA, Bolinder B, et al. Prevalence of inadequate glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes in the United Kingdom general practice research database: a series of retrospective analyses of data from 1998 through 2002. Clin Ther. 2006;28:388–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bodegard J, Sundstrom J, Svennblad B, et al. Changes in body mass index following newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes and risk of cardiovascular mortality: a cohort study of 8486 primary-care patients. Diabetes Metab. 2013;39:306–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Cummins E, Scott N, Rothnie K, et al. Dapagliflozin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Aberdeen: Aberdeen HTA Group, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Charokopou M, Sabater FJ, Townsend R, et al. Methods applied in cost-effectiveness models for treatment strategies in type 2 diabetes mellitus and their use in Health Technology Assessments: a systematic review of the literature from 2008 to 2013. Curr Med Res Opin. 2016;32:207–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank AstraZeneca Greece for sponsoring this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charalampos Tzanetakos.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This study was funded by AstraZeneca Greece. However, the study sponsor had no interference in the study design, data collection, data analysis, or writing of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

CT, NT, GK and NM have no personal or financial conflicts of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 390 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tzanetakos, C., Tentolouris, N., Kourlaba, G. et al. Cost-Effectiveness of Dapagliflozin as Add-On to Metformin for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Greece. Clin Drug Investig 36, 649–659 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-016-0410-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-016-0410-2

Keywords

Navigation