Skip to main content
Log in

Empagliflozin Monotherapy in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Randomized, 12-Week, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Trial

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Advances in Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

This study was designed to determine the efficacy and tolerability of empagliflozin monotherapy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods

Patients with glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥7.0–≤10% were randomized via an interactive web response system, and treated double-blind with empagliflozin 5, 10, 25, 50 mg, or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in HbA1c at week 12. Other endpoints included percentage of patients with HbA1c <7.0% and changes from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), body weight, and systolic blood pressure (SBP) at week 12.

Results

A total of 547 patients were randomized and treated with empagliflozin 5 mg (n = 110), 10 mg (n = 109), 25 mg (n = 109), 50 mg (n = 110), or placebo (n = 109) for 12 weeks. Adjusted mean [95% confidence interval (CI)] differences vs. placebo in changes from baseline in HbA1c were −0.72% (−0.87, −0.57) with empagliflozin 5 mg, −0.70% (−0.85, −0.55) with 10 mg, −0.95% (−1.10, −0.80) with 25 mg, and −0.91 (−1.06, −0.76) with 50 mg (all p < 0.001). More patients with HbA1c ≥7.0% at baseline reached HbA1c <7.0% with empagliflozin (19–33%) than placebo (3%). Compared with placebo, empagliflozin reduced FPG, body weight (p < 0.001 for all doses for both endpoints) and SBP (p = 0.001, p = 0.014 and p = 0.003 for empagliflozin 10, 25, and 50 mg, respectively). Adverse events were reported by 42% of patients receiving placebo and 33–38% of patients receiving empagliflozin. There were few reports of confirmed hypoglycemic adverse events or events consistent with urinary tract infection or genital infection in any treatment group.

Conclusions

Empagliflozin monotherapy for 12 weeks in Japanese patients with T2DM reduced HbA1c, FPG, body weight and SBP, and was well tolerated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Neville SE, Boye KS, Montgomery WS, Iwamoto K, Okamura M, Hayes RP. Diabetes in Japan: a review of disease burden and approaches to treatment. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2009;25:705–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shaw JE, Sicree RA, Zimmet PZ. Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;87:4–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1047–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kawamori R. Diabetes trends in Japan. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2002;18(Suppl 3):S9–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kobayashi M, Yamazaki K, Hirao K, et al. The status of diabetes control and antidiabetic drug therapy in Japan—a cross-sectional survey of 17,000 patients with diabetes mellitus (JDDM 1). Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2006;73:198–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Arai K, Matoba K, Hirao K, et al. Present status of sulfonylurea treatment for type 2 diabetes in Japan: second report of a cross-sectional survey of 15,652 patients. Endocr J. 2010;57:499–507.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach: position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2012;35:1364–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Japan Diabetes Society. Treatment guide for diabetes 2012–2013. http://www.jds.or.jp/modules/en/index.php?content_id=1. Accessed 17 Feb 2014.

  9. Gerich JE. Role of the kidney in normal glucose homeostasis and in the hyperglycaemia of diabetes mellitus: therapeutic implications. Diabet Med. 2010;27:136–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. DeFronzo RA, Davidson JA, Del Prato S. The role of the kidneys in glucose homeostasis: a new path towards normalizing glycaemia. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012;14:5–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grempler R, Thomas L, Eckhardt M, et al. Empagliflozin, a novel selective sodium glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor: characterisation and comparison with other SGLT-2 inhibitors. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012;14:83–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sarashina A, Koiwai K, Seman LJ, et al. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of single doses of empagliflozin, a sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, in healthy Japanese subjects. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2013;28:213–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Seman L, Macha S, Nehmiz G, et al. Empagliflozin (BI 10773), a potent and selective SGLT-2 inhibitor, induces dose-dependent glucosuria in healthy subjects. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2013;2:152–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Heise T, Seewaldt-Becker E, Macha S, et al. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics following 4 weeks’ treatment with empagliflozin once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15:613–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kanada S, Koiwai K, Taniguchi A, Sarashina A, Seman L, Woerle HJ. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of 4 weeks’ treatment with empagliflozin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Investig. 2013;4:613–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ferrannini E, Seman L, Seewaldt-Becker E, Hantel S, Pinnetti S, Woerle HJ. A Phase IIb, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15:721–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosenstock J, Seman LJ, Jelaska A, et al. Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin, a sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, as add-on to metformin in type 2 diabetes with mild hyperglycaemia. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15:1154–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferrannini E, Berk A, Hantel S, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of empagliflozin, sitagliptin, and metformin: an active-controlled, parallel-group, randomized, 78-week open-label extension study in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:4015–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Häring HU, Merker L, Seewaldt-Becker E, et al. Empagliflozin as add-on to metformin plus sulfonylurea in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 24-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:3396–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Häring HU, Merker L, Seewaldt-Becker E, et al. Empagliflozin as add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:1650–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Roden M, Weng J, Eilbracht J, et al. Empagliflozin monotherapy with sitagliptin as an active comparator in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2013;1:208–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rosenstock J, Jelaska A, Wang F, Kim G, Broedl U, Woerle H-J. Empagliflozin as add-on to basal insulin for 78 weeks improves glycemic control with weight loss in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Diabetes. 2013;62 (Suppl 1):A285 (1102-P).

  23. Kovacs CS, Seshiah V, Swallow R, et al. Empagliflozin improves glycaemic and weight control as add-on therapy to pioglitazone or pioglitazone plus metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 24-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014;16:147–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Matsuo S, Imai E, Horio M, et al. Collaborators developing the Japanese equation for estimated GFR. Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;53:982–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kawasaki R, Tanaka S, Tanaka S, et al. Incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy in Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes: 8 year follow-up study of the Japan Diabetes Complications Study (JDCS). Diabetologia. 2011;54:2288–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hardy E, Salsali A, Hruba V, et al. Efficacy increases with increasing baseline HbA1c category with dapagliflozin therapy. Diabetes. 2012;61 (Suppl 1):A23 (82-OR).

  27. Bailey CJ, Gross JL, Pieters A, Bastien A, List JF. Effect of dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes who have inadequate glycaemic control with metformin: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375:2223–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ferrannini E, Ramos SJ, Salsali A, Tang W, List JF. Dapagliflozin monotherapy in type 2 diabetic patients with inadequate glycemic control by diet and exercise: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:2217–24.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schernthaner G, Gross JL, Rosenstock J, et al. Canagliflozin compared with sitagliptin for patients with type 2 diabetes who do not have adequate glycemic control with metformin plus sulfonylurea: a 52-week randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:2508–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Stenlof K, Cefalu WT, Kim KA, et al. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin monotherapy in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with diet and exercise. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15:372–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Strojek K, Yoon KH, Hruba V, Elze M, Langkilde AM, Parikh S. Effect of dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes who have inadequate glycaemic control with glimepiride: a randomized, 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011;13:928–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sone H, Tanaka S, Iimuro S, et al. Waist circumference as a cardiovascular and metabolic risk in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009;17:585–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sone H, Tanaka S, Iimuro S, et al. Components of metabolic syndrome and their combinations as predictors of cardiovascular disease in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Implications for improved definition. Analysis from Japan Diabetes Complications Study (JDCS). J Atheroscler Thromb. 2009;16:380–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Inagaki N, Kondo K, Yoshinari T, Maruyama N, Susuta Y, Kuki H. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15:1136–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kaku K, Inoue S, Matsuoka O, et al. Efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin as a monotherapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus in Japanese patients with inadequate glycaemic control: a phase II multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15:432–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by Boehringer Ingelheim, Ingelheim, Germany and Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, USA. Page processing charges for this manuscript were covered by Boehringer Ingelheim, Ingelheim, Germany. Medical writing assistance was provided by Clare Ryles and Elizabeth Ng of Fleishman-Hillard Group Ltd. and funded by Boehringer Ingelheim, Ingelheim, Germany. All named authors meet the ICMJE criteria for authorship for this manuscript, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given final approval for the version to be published. These data have been presented in poster format at the 73rd Scientific Session of the American Diabetes Association, June 21–25, 2013, Chicago, USA, and at the 57th Annual Meeting of the Japan Diabetes Society, May 22–24, 2014, Osaka, Japan. These data have been published in abstract form in a supplement of Diabetes (Diabetes 2013; 62 (suppl 1): A297–A298).

Conflict of interest

Takashi Kadowaki has received honoraria for lectures from MSD, Ono, Novartis and Sanofi, grants/research support from Chugai, and scholarship grants from MSD and Boehringer Ingelheim. Masakazu Haneda has received honoraria for lectures from MSD, Novartis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Sanofi, Astellas, Kowa, Taisho and Boehringer Ingelheim, and research support from MSD, Daiichi-Sankyo, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Eli Lilly, Astellas and Boehringer Ingelheim. Nobuya Inagaki has participated on advisory panels for Daiichi-Sankyo, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Taisho and Boehringer Ingelheim, has received honoraria for lectures from MSD, Ono, Novartis, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Eli Lilly, Sanofi, Astra Zeneca, Astellas, Kowa, Boehringer Ingelheim, and has received research support from MSD, Ono, Novartis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Eli Lilly, Sanofi, Astra Zeneca, Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai and Boehringer Ingelheim. Yasuo Terauchi has received honoraria for lectures from MSD, Ono, Novartis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Eli Lilly, Sanofi, Astra Zeneca, Kowa and Boehringer Ingelheim, and scholarship grants from MSD, Ono, Novartis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Eli-Lilly, Sanofi, Astra Zeneca, Astellas and Boehringer Ingelheim. These companies are involved in the development and/or distribution of SGLT2 inhibitors. Atsushi Taniguchi is an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim. Kazuki Koiwai is an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim. Henning Rattunde is an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim. Hans J. Woerle is an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim. Uli C. Broedl is an employee of Boehringer Ingelheim.

Compliance with ethics guidelines

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national), and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 and 2008, and in accordance with the International Conference on Harmonization Harmonized Tripartite Guideline for Good Clinical Practice, and the Japanese Good Clinical Practice regulations (Ministry of Health and Welfare Ordinance No. 28, March 27, 1997). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study. The study was approved by respective Institutional Review Boards and Competent Authorities according to national and international regulations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazuki Koiwai.

Additional information

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT01193218.

On behalf of the EMPA-REG DOSEJAPAN™ trial investigators.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 209 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kadowaki, T., Haneda, M., Inagaki, N. et al. Empagliflozin Monotherapy in Japanese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Randomized, 12-Week, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase II Trial. Adv Ther 31, 621–638 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-014-0126-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-014-0126-8

Keywords

Navigation