Abstract
Introduction
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of re-education in the insulin injection technique for glycemic control.
Methods
A preliminary experimental study was performed with 87 insulin-treated diabetic outpatients (11 with type 1 diabetes, 76 with type 2 diabetes; 43 men, 44 women). All patients had been treated with insulin for more than 3 years. After answering questions about the insulin injection technique, the patients’ knowledge levels were scored. Correct answers and explanation sheets were subsequently given to all patients. The physicians in charge gave a short lecture and provided 10 min of individual advice. Two, three, and four months after re-education the HbA1c and glycoalbumin levels were measured.
Results
The mean HbA1c levels of almost all patients significantly improved from 7.46 ± 0.09% to 6.73 ± 0.10% (P < 0.01), and the mean glycoalbumin levels significantly improved from 22.76 ± 0.50% to 20.26 ± 0.68% (P < 0.01). Twenty-five patients demonstrated a poor understanding (score of ≤6 points) and showed a significant decrease in the HbA1c level from 7.62 ± 0.20% to 6.71 ± 0.21% (P = 0.02). Forty-three patients demonstrated a moderate understanding (score of 7 or 8 points) and showed a decrease in the HbA1c level from 7.40 ± 0.13% to 6.68 ± 0.07% (P = 0.07). Finally, 19 patients demonstrated a good understanding (score of ≥9 points) and showed a slight decrease in the HbA1c level from 7.38 ± 0.15% to 6.93 ± 0.12% (P = 0.09). Patients with a poor understanding showed the largest decrease in the mean level of HbA1c.
Conclusion
Re-education in the insulin injection technique led to an improvement in glycemic control in insulin-treated diabetic patients, especially in those with a poor understanding of the insulin injection technique. More attention should be paid to these strategies for outpatients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Yki-Jarvinen H, Kauppila M, Kujansuu E, et al. Comparison of insulin regimen in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Eng J Med. 1992;327:1426–33.
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(14):977–86.
Ohkubo Y, Kishikawa H, Araki E, et al. Intensive insulin therapy prevents the progression of diabetes microvascular complications in Japanese patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized prospective 6-year study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1995;28(2):103–17.
National Institue of Health and Nutrition. Outline of the National Health and Nutrition Survey Japan, 2007. http://www.nih.go.jp/eiken/english/research/pdf/nhns2007.pdf. Accessed 18 Oct 2013.
International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 5th edn. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation, 2011. http://www.idf.org/diabetesatlas. Accessed 18 Oct 2013.
Ohara T, Masato K. Topics of insulin therapy—ultra rapid-acting and development of ultra-long-acting insulin [in Japanese]. J Jpn Med Assoc. 2002;128(10):1530–1.
Frida A, Hirsch L, Gaspar R, et al. The Third Injection Technique Workshop in Athens (TITAN). Diabetes Metab. 2010;36:S19–29.
De Coninck C, Frid A, et al. Results and analysis of the 2008–2009 Insulin Injection Technique Questionnaire survey. J Diabetes 2010;2:168–79.
Hamaguchi T, Namba M. Insulin treatment in elder patients with diabetes. Nihon Rinsho. 2006;64(1):101–5.
Hirsch L, Gaspar R, et al. New injection recommendations for patients with diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2010;38:S3–18.
Kawamori R, Matsuhira M, Yamasaki Y. The biology of insulin action in diabetes. In: Turtle JR, Kaneko T, Osato S, editors. Diabetes in the new millennium. Sydney: University of Sydney Press; 1999. p. 73–84.
Asakura T, Seino H. Air that was mixed into the insulin cartridge inside (bubble)—the effect that gives the accuracy of the pen-type insulin injection device [in Japanese]. J Jpn Diabete Soc. 2004;47:391–4.
American Diabetes Association. Insulin administration: clinical practice recommendation 2000. Diabete Care. 2001;24(suppl1):S94–7.
Chantelau E, Heinemann L, Ross D. Air bubbles in insulin pens. Lancet. 1989;2:387–8.
Koivisto VA, Felig P. Alterations in insulin absorption and in blood glucose control associated with varying insulin injection sites in diabetic patients. Ann Intern Med. 1980;92:59–61.
Koivisto VA, Felig P. Effects of leg exercise on insulin absorption in diabetic patients. N Engl J Med. 1978;298:79–83.
Berger M, Halban PA, Assal JP, Offord RE, Vranic M, Renold AE. Pharmacokinetics of subcutaneously injected tritiated insulin: effects of exercise. Diabetes. 1979;28:53–6.
Koivisto VA, Fortney S, Hendler R, Felig P. A rise in ambient temperature augments insulin absorption in diabetic patients. Metabolism. 1981;30:402–5.
Berger M, Cuppers HJ, Hegner H, Jorgens V, Berchtold P. Absorption kinetics and biologic effects of subcutaneously injected insulin preparations. Diabetes Care. 1982;5:77–91.
Koivisto VA. Sauna-induced acceleration in insulin absorption from subcutaneous injection site. Br Med J. 1980;298:1411–3.
Zehrer C, Hansen R, Bantle J. Reducing blood glucose variability by use of abdominal insulin injection sites. Diabetes Educ. 1990;16(6):474–7.
Kordonouri O, Lauterborn R, Deiss D. Lipohypertrophy in young patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(3):643.
Hauner H, Stockamo B, et al. Prevalence of lipohypertrophy in insulin-treated diabetic patients and predisposing factors. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 1996;104:106–10.
McNally PG, Jowett NI, et al. Lipohypertrophy and lipoatrophy complicating treatment with highly purified bovine and porcine insulins. Postgrad Med J. 1988;64(757):850–3.
American Diabetes Association. Insulin administration. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:1984–7.
Strauss K, Hannet I, et al. Ultra-short (5 mm) insulin needles: trial results and clinical recommendations. Pract Diabetes Int. 1999;16:218–22.
Milicevic Z, Profozic V, Wyatt J, et al. Intramuscular injection of insulin lispro or soluble human insulin: pharmacokinetics and glucodynamics in Type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Med. 2001;18(7):562–6.
Annersten M, Frid A. Insulin pens dribble from the tip of the needle after injection. Pract Diabetes Int. 2000;17:109–11.
Le Floch JP, Herbreteau C, Lange F, Perlemuter L. Biologic material in needles and cartridges after insulin injection with a pen in diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:1502–4.
Hunt LM, Valenzuela MA, Pugh JA. NIDDM patients’ fears and hopes about insulin therapy. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:292–8.
Schiel R, Mullar UA, Ulbrich S. Long-term efficacy of a 5-day structured teaching and treatment programme for intensified conventional insulin therapy and risk for severe hypoglycemia. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1997;35:41–8.
Acknowledgments
Dr. Yuki Nakatani is the guarantor for this article, and takes responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole. Medical writing assistance was provided by Angela Morben of Edanz® and was funded by Dr. Yuki Nakatani.
Conflict of interest
Yuki Nakatani, Mihoko Matsumura, Tsuyoshi Monden, Yoshimasa Aso, and Takaaki Nakamoto declare that they have no conflicts of interest. No funding or sponsorship was received for this study or publication of this article.
Compliance with ethical guidelines
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 and 2008. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nakatani, Y., Matsumura, M., Monden, T. et al. Improvement of Glycemic Control by Re-education in Insulin Injection Technique in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus. Adv Ther 30, 897–906 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-013-0066-8
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-013-0066-8