Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

NICE-Accredited Commissioning Guidance for Weight Assessment and Management Clinics: a Model for a Specialist Multidisciplinary Team Approach for People with Severe Obesity

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite increasing prevalence of obesity, no country has successfully implemented comprehensive pathways to provide advice to all the severely obese patients that seek treatment. We aimed to formulate pathways for referral into and out of weight assessment and management clinics (WAMCs) that include internal medicine/primary care physicians as part of a multidisciplinary team that could provide specialist advice and interventions, including referral for bariatric surgery. Using a National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE)-accredited process, a Guidance Development Group conducted a literature search identifying existing WAMCs. As very few examples of effective structures and clinical pathways existed, the current evidence base for optimal assessment and management of bariatric surgery patients was used to reach a consensus. The model we describe could be adopted internationally by health services to manage severely obese patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384:766–81.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Atkinson RL. Current status of the field of obesity. Trends Endocrinol Metab: TEM. 2014;25:283–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Buchwald H, Oien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery worldwide 2011. Obes Surg. 2013;23:427–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ryan DH. New medications and new ways to use them. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015;23 Suppl 1:S1–4. doi:10.1002/oby.21091.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Haslam D. Obesity in primary care: prevention, management and the paradox. BMC Med. 2014;12:149.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bardia A, Holtan SG, Slezak JM, et al. Diagnosis of obesity by primary care physicians and impact on obesity management. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82:927–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Managing overweight and obesity in adults—lifestyle weight management services. NICE guidelines [PH53]. 2014. [WWW document]. URL http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ph53.

  8. Bodenheimer T, Wagner E, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model. JAMA. 2002;288:1775–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hainer V. How should the obese patient be managed? Possible approaches to a national obesity management network. Int J Obes. 1999;23:S14–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. National Obesity Observatory. Prevalence of severe obesity among adults aged 16+ years. [WWW document]. URL http://www.noo.org.uk/NOO_about_obesity/severe_obesity. Accessed 13 May 2015.

  11. Obesity: identification, assessment and management of overweight and obesity in children, young people and adults. NICE guidelines [CG189]. 2014. [WWW document]. URL http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg189.

  12. Developing a specification for lifestyle weight management services. Best practice guidance for Tier 2 services. Department of Health, Obesity and Food Policy Branch, PHD. 2013. [WWW document]. URL https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/142723/Weight_Management_Service_Spec_FINAL_with_IRB.pdf.

  13. NHS (2013) Clinical commissioning policy: complex and specialised obesity surgery. Reference NHSCB/A05/P/a. [WWW document]. URL http://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/a05-p-a.pdf.

  14. BOMSS. Providing bariatric surgery: BOMSS standards for clinical services & guidance on commissioning. London: British Obesity & Metabolic Surgery Society. 2012. [WWW document]. URL http://www.bomss.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Service_std-2012.pdf.

  15. NICE. Preventing type 2 diabetes: risk identification and interventions for individuals at high risk. PH38. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. 2012. [WWW document]. URL http://guidance.nice.org.uk/PH38.

  16. Royal College of Physicians. Action on obesity: comprehensive care for all. Report of a working party. London: RCP. 2013. [WWW document]. URL http://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/sites/default/files/action-on-obesity.pdf.

  17. Academy of Medical Royal Colleges. Measuring up. The medical profession’s prescription for the nation’s obesity crisis. London 2013. [WWW document]. URL http://www.aomrc.org.uk/about-us/news/item/doctors-unite-to-deliver-prescription-for-uk-obesity-epidemic.html.

  18. NICE accreditation process. [WWW document]. URL www.nice.org.uk/accreditation.

  19. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0. March 2011. [WWW document]. URL http://handbook.cochrane.org.

  20. Commissioning guide. Weight assessment and management clinics (tier 3). 2014. [WWW document]. URL https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/healthcare-bodies/docs/weight-assessment-and-management-tier-3-services.

  21. Morrison DS, Boyle S, Morrison S, et al. Evaluation of the first phase of a specialist weight management programme in the UK National Health Service: prospective cohort study. Public Health Nutr. 2012;15:22–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lean M, Brosnahan N, McLoone P, et al. Feasibility and indicative results from a 12-month low-energy liquid diet treatment and maintenance programme for severe obesity. Br J Gen Pract. 2013;63:e115–24.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. NICE. Obesity. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. 2006. [WWW document]. URL http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/CG43NICEGuideline.pdf.

  24. SIGN. Management of obesity. 115. Edinburgh: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. 2010. [WWW document]. URL www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign115.pdf.

  25. Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz RI. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(25):1887–92.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Benson K, Hartz AJ. A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(25):1878–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. World Obesity Federation. Get obesity certification online with SCOPE! 2015 [WWW document]. URL http://www.worldobesity.org/scope/certification.

  28. American Board of Obesity Medicine. ABOM 2015 [WWW document]. URL http://abom.org.

  29. Mechanick JI, Youdim A, Jones DB, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient—2013 update: co-sponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery. Obesity. 2013;21:S1–27 (2008 Clinical practice guidelines).

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Padwal RJ, Pajewski NM, Allison DB, et al. Using the Edmonton obesity staging system to predict mortality in a population-representative cohort of people. CMAJ. 2011;83:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  31. National Obesity Observatory. Brief interventions for weight management. National Obesity Observatory. 2011. [WWW document]. URL http://www.noo.org.uk/uploads/doc/vid_10702_BIV2.pdf.

  32. Rollnick S, Heather N, Bell A. Negotiating behaviour change in medical settings: the development of brief motivational interviewing. J Ment Health. 1992;1:25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wadden TA, Sarwer DB. Behavioral assessment of candidates for bariatric surgery: a patient-oriented approach. Obesity. 2006;14:53S–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dixon JB, Zimmet P, Alberti KG, Rubino F, on behalf of the International Diabetes Federation Taskforce on Epidemiology and Prevention. Bariatric surgery: an IDF statement for obese type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2011;28:628–42.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Pratt JSA, Lenders CM, Dionne EA, et al. Best practice updates for pediatric/adolescent weight loss surgery. Obesity. 2009;17:901–10. doi:10.1038/oby.2008.577.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Collazo-Clavell ML, Clark MM, McAlpine DE, et al. Assessment and preparation of patients for bariatric surgery. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81:S11–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kelly JJ, Shikora S, Jones DB, et al. Best practice updates for surgical care in weight loss surgery. Obesity. 2009;17:863–70. doi:10.1038/oby.2008.570.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Apovian CM, Cummings S, Anderson W, et al. Best practice updates for multidisciplinary care in weight loss surgery. Obesity. 2009;17:871–89. doi:10.1038/oby.2008.580.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Too Lean a Service? A review of the care of patients who underwent bariatric surgery. 2012. http://www.ncepod.org.uk/2012report2/downloads/BS_fullreport.pdf.

  40. Wee CC, Pratt JS, Fanelli R, et al. Best practice updates for informed consent and patient education in weight loss surgery. Obesity. 2009;17:885–8. doi:10.1038/oby.2008.567.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Johnson JL, Slentz CA, Houmard JA, et al. Exercise training amount and intensity effects on metabolic syndrome (from studies of a targeted risk reduction intervention through defined exercise). Am J Cardiol. 2007;100(12):1759–66.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Greenburg I, Sogg S, Perna FM. Behavioral and psychological care in weight loss surgery: best practice update. Obesity. 2009;17:880–4. doi:10.1038/oby.2008.571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Impact of weight on quality of life questionnaire. [WWW document]. URL http://www.med.umich.edu/intmed/endocrinology/weightmanagement/IWQOL-LiteEnglish-US.pdf.

  44. SF-12 V2. [WWW document]. URL http://www.sf-36.org/demos/SF-12v2.html.

  45. EQ5D. [WWW document]. URL http://www.euroqol.org/about-eq-5d.html.

  46. Eypasch E, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinee S, et al. Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg. 1995;82:216–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. [WWW document]. URL http://www.hqlo.com/content/pdf/1477-7525-1-29.pdf.

  48. Fairburn CG, Beglin SJ. Assessment of eating disorders: interview or self-report questionnaire? Int J Eat Disord. 1994;16:363–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Eating Habits Questionnaire. [WWW document]. URL http://www.nhrmc.org/workfiles/Good%20For%20You/Nutrition.pdf.

  50. Obesity in the UK: a psychological perspective. The British Psychological Society Professional Practice Board. 2011. [WWW document]. URL http://www.bps.org.uk/system/files/documents/obesity_report_2011.pdf.

  51. Stevens T, Spavin S, Scholtz S, et al. Your patient and weight-loss surgery. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 2012;18:418–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Casazza K, Fontaine KR, Astrup A, et al. Myths, presumptions, and facts about obesity. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:446–54.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Zijlstra H, Larsen JK, de Ridder DTD, et al. Initiation and maintenance of weight loss after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. the role of outcome expectation and satisfaction with the psychosocial outcome. Obes Surg. 2009;19:725–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Gibbons LM, Sarwer DB, Crerand CE, et al. Previous weight loss experiences of bariatric surgery candidates: how much have patients dieted prior to surgery? Obesity. 2006;14:70S–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ochner CN, Dambkowski CL, Yeomans BL, et al. Pre-bariatric surgery weight loss requirements and the effect of preoperative weight loss on postoperative outcome. Int J Obes. 2012;36:1380–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. ASMBS position statement on preoperative supervised weight loss requirements. 2011. http://asmbs.org/2012/01/preoperative-supervised-weight-loss-requirements.

  57. Cassie S, Menezes C, Birch DW, et al. Effect of preoperative weight loss in bariatric surgical patients: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7:760–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Livhits M, Mercado C, Yermilov I, et al. Does weight loss immediately before bariatric surgery improve outcomes: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5:713–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. NHS Diabetes. Joint British Diabetes Societies Inpatient Care Group. Management of adults with diabetes undergoing surgery and elective procedures: improving standards. 2011. [WWW document]. URL http://www.diabetes.nhs.uk/document.php?o=224.

  60. Myers K, Hajek P, Hinds C, et al. Stopping smoking shortly before surgery and postoperative complications. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2011;171:983–9.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Richman RM, Webster P, Salgo AR, et al. A shared care approach in obesity management: the general practitioner and a hospital based service. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1996;20:413–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Jensen MD, Ryan DH, Apovian CM, et al. 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.004.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Sjöström L, Lindroos A-K, Peltonen M, et al. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2683–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Livhits M, Mercado C, Yermilov I, et al. Exercise following bariatric surgery: systematic review. Obes Surg. 2010;20:657–65.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. BAPRAS/RCS NICE-approved commissioning guidance on body contouring surgery 2014. [WWW document]. URL http://www.rcseng.ac.uk/healthcare-bodies/docs/published-guides/body-contouring-surgery.

  66. Jennings A, Hughes CA, Kumaravel B, et al. Evaluation of a multidisciplinary Tier 3 weight management service for adults with morbid obesity, or obesity and comorbidities, based in primary care. Clin Obes. 2014;5:254–66. doi:10.1111/cob.12066. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cob.12066/abstract.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Parretti HM, Hughes CA, O’Kane M, et al. Ten top tips for the management of patients post-bariatric surgery in primary care. Br J Obes. 2015;1:68–73.

    Google Scholar 

  68. National Obesity Observatory. Standard evaluation framework for weight management interventions. National Obesity Observatory. 2009. [WWW document]. URL http://www.noo.org.uk/core/frameworks/SEF.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Welbourn.

Ethics declarations

The article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. Informed consent does not apply to the paper.

Conflict of Interest

RW received sponsorship for attending conference/educational workshops from Ethicon Endo-Surgery, member of the National Obesity Advisory Board, Novo Nordisk; Past President of the British Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Society (unpaid), Chair of the UK National Bariatric Surgery Registry (unpaid) and GDG member of NICE Guidance update CG189, 2014 (unpaid). Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton UK, received funding for a bariatric surgery training fellowship from Ethicon Endo-Surgery.

JD is a consultant for Apollo Endosurgery, and Bariatric Advantage, and is a member of the Optifast® Medical Advisory Board for Nestle Health, Australia, and the Specialist Obesity and GP Obesity Advisory Boards for Novo Nordisk. He has been supported to provide educational programs and develop educational material for iNova Pharmaceuticals. He has received speakers’ fees from Novo Nordisk, iNova Pharmaceuticals and Eli Lilly and fees as a co-director of the Metabolic/Bariatric programme of the Minimally Invasive Surgery Symposium.

JHB received fees for consultancy from Slimming World and Lighterlife and for research from Roche Counterweight Project.

NF received fees for consultancy, sponsorship for meeting attendance or lecture fees from Novo Nordisk, Janssen, Vivus and Arena; shares in Counterweight PLC, current value nil; Editor-in-Chief in Clinical Obesity, the official journal of World Obesity Federation, published by Wiley; Medical Advisor to Weight Concern (unpaid), a charitable organisation; and received unrestricted CME grant from the International Medical Press.

CWleR received fees for consultancy from Novo Nordisk and Herbalife Advisory Boards and speaker fees from Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, Lilly and Boehringer Ingelheim.

CAH received fees for consultancy from Orexigen, Mundipharma, Oviva, Janssen and Ethicon; an education grant from Nutricia; GDG member of NICE Guidance update CG189, 2014 and NICE quality standards Obesity 2015 (unpaid); a co-opted member of board of the Association for the Study of Obesity; and a medical advisor to KasTech (unpaid).

JW declared no conflict of interest.

Funding Declaration

The Department of Health Right Care initiative funded the costs of the Guidance Development Group and literature searches and contributed towards administrative costs. The Royal College of Surgeons of England and the British Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Society provided staff to support the guideline development.

Sponsoring Organisations

This study was sponsored by Royal Colleges of Surgeons of England, Royal College of Physicians (London), Royal College of General Practitioners, Royal College of Pathologists, Royal College of Psychiatrists, Faculty of Public Health, British Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Society, British Dietetic Association, British Psychological Society, National Obesity Forum.

Additional information

Other members of the Guidance Development Group are included in the Web version of the full guidance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Welbourn, R., Dixon, J., Barth, J.H. et al. NICE-Accredited Commissioning Guidance for Weight Assessment and Management Clinics: a Model for a Specialist Multidisciplinary Team Approach for People with Severe Obesity. OBES SURG 26, 649–659 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-2041-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-2041-8

Keywords

Navigation