Abstract
Background
Many obese patients fail conventional medical management and decline bariatric surgery. Less invasive weight loss options such as intragastric balloons may provide an opportunity to reach this large number of untreated patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and effectiveness of the Dual Intragastric Balloon (DIGB) in the treatment of obese patients, as well as the impact of degree of obesity, age, and gender.
Methods
The study was conducted at the Bariatric Endoscopy Unit of the Madrid Sanchinarro University Hospital. Sixty patients (11 men, 49 women) underwent endoscopic placement of a DIGB filled with a total of 900 cc of saline (450 cc in each balloon) for at least 6 months, along with regular counseling from a multidisciplinary team. Study outcomes included: change in body weight (TBWL), % of loss of initial body weight (%TBWL), % of excess body weight loss (%EWL), and adverse events.
Results
Initial BMI 38.8 kg/m2 decreased 6.1 units, with mean TBWL, %TBWL, and %EWL of 16.6 kg, 15.4 %, and 47.1 %, respectively. We found no difference in %TBWL between grade of obesity, age or sex, but morbidly obese patients demonstrated greater TBWL, and women and less obese subjects obtained higher %EWL. The DIGB was generally well tolerated, with one early removal for patient intolerance, one early deflation without migration, and one gastric perforation. Fourteen patients had small, clinically insignificant ulcers or erosions noted at the time of removal.
Conclusions
The present study shows that the DIGB was easy to use, resulted in significant weight loss, safe, and well tolerated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hiatt WR, Thomas A, Goldfine AB. What cost weight loss? Circulation. 2012;125(9):1171–7. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.023499.
Kushner RF, Ryan DH. Assessment and lifestyle management of patients with obesity: clinical recommendations from systematic reviews. JAMA. 2014;312(9):943–52. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.10432.
Middleton KM, Patidar SM, Perri MG. The impact of extended care on the long-term maintenance of weight loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2012;13(6):509–17. doi:10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00972.x.
Yanovski SZ, Yanovski JA. Long-term drug treatment for obesity: a systematic and clinical review. JAMA. 2014;311(1):74–86. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281361.
Chang SH, Stoll CR, Song J, et al. The effectiveness and risks of bariatric surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis, 2003-2012. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(3):275–87. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3654.
Ponce J, Quebbemann BB, Patterson EJ. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study evaluating safety and efficacy of intragastric dual-balloon in obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(2):290–5. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2012.07.007.
Genco A, Balducci S, Bacci V, et al. Intragastric balloon or diet alone? A retrospective evaluation. Obes Surg. 2008;18(8):989–92. doi:10.1007/s11695-007-9383-9.
Lopez-Nava G, Rubio MA, Prados S, et al. BioEnterics® intragastric balloon (BIB®). Single ambulatory center Spanish experience with 714 consecutive patients treated with one or two consecutive balloons. Obes Surg. 2011;21(1):5–9. doi:10.1007/s11695-010-0093-3.
Bautista-Castaño I, Molina-Cabrillana J, Montoya-Alonso JA, et al. Variables predictive of adherence to diet and physical activity recommendations in the treatment of obesity and overweight, in a group of Spanish subjects. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004;28(5):697–705.
Zerrweck C, Maunoury V, Caiazzo R, et al. Preoperative weight loss with intragastric balloon decreases the risk of significant adverse outcomes of laparoscopic gastric bypass in super-super obese patients. Obes Surg. 2012;22(5):777–82. doi:10.1007/s11695-011-0571-2. PubMed.
Genco A, López-Nava G, Wahlen C, et al. Multi-centre European experience with intragastric balloon in overweight populations: 13 years of experience. Obes Surg. 2013;23(4):515–21. doi:10.1007/s11695-012-0829-3. PubMed.
Machytka E, Klvana P, Kornbluth A, et al. Adjustable intragastric balloons: a 12-month pilot trial in endoscopic weight loss management. Obes Surg. 2011;21(10):1499–507. doi:10.1007/s11695-011-0424-z.
Ethical Approval
All procedures were conducted in accordance with good clinical practice and within the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki for studies using human subjects. The study was registered with the institutional review board of the Sanchinarro University Hospital of Madrid. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Data were collected prospectively for analysis.
Conflict of Interest
The study was fully funded by ReShape Medical. All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lopez-Nava, G., Bautista-Castaño, I., Jimenez-Baños, A. et al. Dual Intragastric Balloon: Single Ambulatory Center Spanish Experience with 60 Patients in Endoscopic Weight Loss Management. OBES SURG 25, 2263–2267 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1715-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1715-6