Skip to main content
Log in

Adjustable Intragastric Balloon vs Non-Adjustable Intragastric Balloon: Case–Control Study on Complications, Tolerance, and Efficacy

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The objective of this study is the comparison of a new intragastric balloon recently introduced, the Adjustable Balloon System (ABS), with the BioEnterics intragastric balloon (BIB) in terms of tolerance, safety, and weight loss parameters.

Methods

A case–control study was done: 40 patients were matched with 80 controls. To achieve the same duration therapy (12 months), a single ABS positioning was compared with a BIB followed by another BIB (6 + 6 months). Length of procedure, hospital stay, complications, and weight loss parameters after 6 months (time of first BIB removal) and after 12 months from baseline (time of Spatz and second BIB removal) were considered. Statistical analysis was done by means of Student’s t test, χ2 test, or Fisher’s test. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Mortality, positioning, and extraction complications were absent. Both the devices were well tolerated with slight duration of post placement symptoms. During this study, the Spatz balloon was adjusted with inflation of 200 cm3 of saline (total, 800 cm3) in 9/40 (22.5 %) patients, for poor weight loss after first 6-months treatment. In the Spatz group, there occurred 7/40 complications linked to the device and in 6/7 patients the balloon was removed. At the end of the study, the weight loss parameters were similar between groups: BMI 31.0 ± 11.8 (Spatz group) vs 31.3 ± 12.3 (BIB group) (p = Ns).

Conclusions

The idea of dynamic balloon therapy needs to be confirmed with wider series. The rate of complication reported is very high, and several studies regarding safety and efficacy are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Genco A, Balducci S, Bacci V, et al. Intragastric balloon or diet alone? A retrospective evaluation. Obes Surg. 2008;18(8):989–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Imaz I, Martinez-Cervell C, Garcia-Alvarez EE, et al. Safety and effectiveness of the intragastric balloon for obesity. A meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2008;18:841–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Angrisani L, Lorenzo M, Borrelli V, et al. Is bariatric surgery necessary after intragastric balloon treatment? Obes Surg. 2006;16:1135–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Al-Momen A, El-Mogy I. Intragastric balloon for obesity: a retrospective evaluation of tolerance and efficacy. Obes Surg. 2005;15(1):101–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. De Waele B, Reynaert H, Urbain D, et al. Intragastric balloons for preoperative weight reduction. Obes Surg. 2000;10(1):58–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Machytka E, Klvana P, Kornbluth A, et al. Adjustable Intragastric Balloons: a 12-months pilot trial in endoscopic weight loss management. Obes Surg. 2011;21:1499–507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Espinet-Coll E, Nebreda-Duran J, Gomez-Valero JA, et al. Current endoscopic techniques in the treatment of obesity. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2012;104:72–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Genco A, Cipriano M, Bacci V, et al. Intragastric balloon followed by diet vs intragastric balloon followed by another balloon. A prospective study on 100 patients. Obes Surg. 2010;20(11):1096–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schapiro M, Benjamin S, Blackburn G, et al. Obesity and the gastric balloon: a comprehensive workshop. Tarpon springs, Florida, March 19–21, 1987. Gastrointest Endosc. 1987;33:323–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Genco A, Cipriano M, Bacci V, et al. Bioenterics intragastric balloon (BIB): a double blind, randomised, controlled, cross-over study. Int J Obes. 2006;30:129–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. NIH Conference. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Consensus Development Conference Panel. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115:956–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Messina T, Genco A, Favaro R, et al. Intragastric balloon positioning and removal: sedation or general anesthesia? Surg Endosc. 2011;25:3811–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsesmeli N, Cosimaros D. The future of bariatrics: endoscopy, endoluminal surgery, and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Endoscopy. 2010;42:155–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. De la Riva S, Munoz-Navas M, Rodriguez-Lago I, et al. Small bowel migration: possible complication of adjustable intragastric balloon. Endoscopy. 2012;44:E224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Villalonga R, Valverde S, Caubet E. Intestinal occlusion as unusual complication of new intragastric balloon Spatz Adjustable Balloon system for treatment of morbid obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(1):e16–7. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2011.12.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dumonceau LM. Evidence based review of the BioEnterics intragastric balloon for weight loss. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1611–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Spyropoulos C, Katsakoulis E, Mead N, et al. Intragastric balloon for high risk super-obese patients: a prospective analysis of efficacy. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3:78–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lopez-Nava G, Rubio MA, Prados S, et al. BioEnterics intragastric balloon (BIB). Single Ambulatory Center Spanish Experience with 714 consecutive patients treated with one or two consecutive balloons. Obes Surg. 2011;21:5–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Genco A, Bruni T, Doldi SB, et al. BioEnterics intragastric balloon: the Italian experience with 2,515 patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1161–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michele Lorenzo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Genco, A., Dellepiane, D., Baglio, G. et al. Adjustable Intragastric Balloon vs Non-Adjustable Intragastric Balloon: Case–Control Study on Complications, Tolerance, and Efficacy. OBES SURG 23, 953–958 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-013-0891-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-013-0891-5

Keywords

Navigation