Skip to main content
Log in

Bromocriptine treatment over 12 years in acromegaly: effect on glucose tolerance and insulin secretion

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The clinical investigator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

It is not known whether the beneficial effect of bromocriptine on glucose homeostasis in acromegaly is limited by a certain duration of therapy. To elucidate this problem, oral glucose tolerance tests were performed in 12 acromegaly patients before bromocriptine medication, under therapy (15.0 ± 6.8 mg/day for 12 ± 3 years), and during a 2-week drug withdrawal after long-term treatment. Initially altered glucose tolerance was normalized in 4 of 5 patients under bromocriptine therapy. During drug withdrawal the mean fasting glucose level and the mean glucose concentration at 120 min after oral glucose load increased from 5.05 ± 0.61 to 5.77 ± 0.78 mmol/1 and from 5.61 ±2.05 to 7.55 ± 3.05 mmol/1, respectively. A deterioration in glucose homeostasis was observed in 9 patients, and impaired glucose tolerance was ameliorated (but not to normal range) in 2 when bromocriptine was withdrawn. The proportion of alterations in glucose tolerance during drug withdrawal corresponded to that before the beginning of long-term bromocriptine treatment. Impaired glucose tolerance, observed in 2 patients under bromocriptine treatment, seemed to be compensated because a distinct elevation of glycosylated hemoglobin A1c was not observed. Bromocriptine led to a significant decrease in basal as well as glucose-stimulated insulin levels, and growth hormone secretion during oral glucose load was reduced in all 12 patients. Similarly to the increased growth hormone secretion after drug withdrawal in 11 patients, a rise in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion was found in all patients; hereby, the mean insulin levels at 0 and 120 min during oral glucose load rose significantly from 7.5 ± 2.6 to 12.1 ± 5.1 mU/1 (P<0.01) and from 71.3±52.1 to 101.4±50.7 mU/1 (P<0.02), respectively. A direct relationship between disturbance in glucose homeostasis and degree of hypersomatotropism was not observed. Our data confirm that the beneficial effect of bromocriptine therapy on glucose homeostasis in selected patients with acromegaly is still present after dopaminergic treatment over a mean period of 12 years. Compared with the published rates on improved glucose homeostasis under octreotide, the effect of bromocriptine seems to be more favorable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AUC:

area under the curve

GH:

growth hormone

PRL:

prolactin

References

  1. Althoff PH, Böttger B, Rosak C, Harz C, Jungmann E, Schöffling K (1982) Zur Bromocriptin-Langzeitbehandlung der Akromegalie. In: Pfeiffer EF (ed) Bromocriptin. Ein fachübergreifendes Therapieprinzip. Schattauer, Stuttgart, pp 149–173

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carlson HE, Levin SR, Braunstein GD, Spencer EM, Wilson SE, Hershman JM (1984) Effect of bromocriptine on serum hormones in acromegaly. Horm Res 19:142–152

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chiba T, Chihara K, Minamitani N, Goto S, Kadowaki S, Taminato T, Matsukura S, Fujita T (1982) Effect of longterm bromocriptine treatment on glucose intolerance in acromegaly. Horm Metab Res 14:57–61

    Google Scholar 

  4. Faglia G, Arosio M, Ambrosi B (1985) Recent advances in diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly. In: Imura H (ed) The pituitary gland. Raven, New York, pp 363–404

    Google Scholar 

  5. Feek CM, Bevan JS, Taylor S, Brown NS, Baird JD (1981) The effect of bromocriptine on insulin secretion and glucose tolerance in patients with acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol 15:473–478

    Google Scholar 

  6. Halse J, Harris AG, Kvistborg A, Kjartansson O, Hanssen E, Smiseth O, Djosland O, Hass G, Jervell J (1990) A randomized study of SMS 201–995 versus bromocriptine treatment in acromegaly: clinical and biochemical effects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 70:1254–1261

    Google Scholar 

  7. Haslbeck M, Mehnert H (1984) Diagnose und Differentialdiagnose. In: Mehnert H, Schöffling K (eds) Diabetologie in Klinik und Praxis. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 100–137

    Google Scholar 

  8. Johnston DG, Alberti KG, Nattrass M, Burin JM, Bleas-Malpica G, Hall K, Hall R (1980) Hyperinsulinaemia in hyperprolactinaemic women. Clin Endocrinol 13:361–368

    Google Scholar 

  9. Koenig RJ, Peterson CM, Kilo C, Cerami A, Williamson JR (1976) Hemoglobin A, as an indicator of the degree of glucose intolerance in diabetes. Diabetes 25:230–232

    Google Scholar 

  10. Landgraf R, Landgraf-Leurs MM, Weissmann A, Hörl R, von Werder K, Scriba PC (1977) Prolactin: a diabetogenic hormone. Diabetologia 13:99–104

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lerario AC, el-Andere W, Wajchenberg BL, Ohnuma LY, Rocha MH, Andriolo A (1989) Insulin resistance in acromegaly: evaluation by studies of insulin binding to erythrocytes. J Endocrinol Invest 12:155–161

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liuzzi A, Chiodini PG, Botalla L, Cremascoli G, Müller EE, Silvestrini F (1974) Decreased plasma growth hormone (GH) levels in acromegalics following CB 154 (2-Br-α-ergo-cryptine) administration. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 38:910–912

    Google Scholar 

  13. Luft R, Ikkos D, Gemzell CA, Olivecrona H (1958) Effect of human growth hormone in hypophysectomized diabetic subjects. Lancet I:721–722

    Google Scholar 

  14. McKnight JA, McCance CR, Sheridan B, McIlrath E, Hadden DR, Kennedy L, Atkinson AB (1991) A long-term dose-response study of somatostatin analogue (SMS 201–995, octreotide) in resistant acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol 34:119–125

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nathan DM, Singer DE, Hurxthal K, Goodson JD (1984) The clinical information value of the glycosylated hemoglobin assay. N Engl J Med 310:341–346

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rau H, Althoff PH, Schmidt K, Usadel KH (1992) Bromocriptine treatment over 12 years in acromegaly: effect on growth hormone and prolactin secretion. Acta Endocrinol 126:247–252

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sachs L (1984) Angewandte Statistik: Anwendung statistischer Methoden. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 244–246, 548–549

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sassolas G, Harris AG, James-Deidier A (1990) Long-term effect of incremental doses of the somatostatin analog SMS 201–995 in 58 acromegalic patients. French SMS 201–995 approximately equal to Acromegaly Study Group. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 71:391–397

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sönksen PH, Greenwood FC, Ellis JP, Lowy C, Rutherford A, Nabarro JD (1967) Changes in carbohydrate tolerance in acromegaly with progress of the disease and in response to treatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 27:1418–1430

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vance ML, Harris AG (1991) Long-term treatment of 189 acromegalic patients with the somatostatin analog octreotide. Results of the International Multicenter Acromegaly Study Group. Arch Intern Med 151:1573–1578

    Google Scholar 

  21. Von Werder K (1988) Bromocriptine treatment in acromegaly. In: Lamberts SW (ed) Sandostatin in the treatment of acromegaly. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 45–52

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wass JA, Cudworth AG, Bottazzo GF, Woodrow JC, Besser GM (1980) An assessment of glucose intolerance in acromegaly and its response to medical treatment. Clin Endocrinol 12:53–59

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wright AD, Hartog M, Palter H, Tevaarwerk G, Doyle FH, Arnot R, Joplin GF, Russel Fraser T (1970) The use of yttrium 90 implantation in the treatment of acromegaly. Proc R Soc Med 63:221–223

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dedicated to Prof. Dr. N. Zöllner on the occasion of his 70th birthday

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rau, H., Althoff, PH., Schmidt, K. et al. Bromocriptine treatment over 12 years in acromegaly: effect on glucose tolerance and insulin secretion. Clin Investig 71, 372–378 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00186626

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00186626

Key words

Navigation