Skip to main content
Top

04-19-2018 | Type 2 diabetes | Article

Treatment Intensification in Type 2 Diabetes: A Real-World Study of 2-OAD Regimens, GLP-1 RAs, or Basal Insulin

Journal: Diabetes Therapy

Authors: Lawrence Blonde, Denis Raccah, Elisheva Lew, Juliana Meyers, Elena Nikonova, Mayank Ajmera, Keith L. Davis, Monica Bertolini, Bruno Guerci

Publisher: Springer Healthcare

Abstract

Introduction

Treatment guidelines recommend a stepwise approach to glycemia management in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), but this may result in uncontrolled glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) between steps. This retrospective analysis compared clinical and economic outcomes among patients with uncontrolled T2D initiating two oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), or basal insulin in a real-world setting.

Methods

Adults with T2D on OAD monotherapy were identified in the MarketScan claims database (2007–2014). Those initiating two OADs (simultaneously or sequentially), GLP-1 RAs, or basal insulin were selected (date of initiation was termed the ‘index date’); patients were required to have HbA1c > 7.0% in the 6 months pre-index date. HbA1c was compared from 6 months pre- to 1-year post-index. Annual all-cause healthcare utilization and costs were reported over the 1-year follow-up period.

Results

Data for 6054 patients were analyzed (2-OAD, n = 4442; GLP-1 RA, n = 361; basal insulin, n = 1251). Baseline HbA1c was high in all cohorts, but highest in the basal-insulin cohort. Treatment initiation resulted in reductions in HbA1c in all cohorts, which was generally maintained throughout the follow-up period. Average HbA1c reductions from the 6 months pre- to 1 year post-index date were −1.2% for GLP-1 RA, −1.6% for OADs, and −1.8% for basal insulin. HbA1c < 7.0% at 1 year occurred in 32.6%, 47.5%, and 41.1% of patients, respectively. Annual healthcare costs (mean [SD]) were lowest for OAD (US$10,074 [$22,276]) followed by GLP-1 RA (US$14,052 [$23,829]) and basal insulin (US$18,813 [$37,332]).

Conclusion

Despite robust HbA1c lowering following treatment initiation, many patients did not achieve HbA1c < 7.0%. Basal insulin, generally prescribed for patients with high baseline HbA1c, was associated with a large reduction in HbA1c and with higher costs. Therapy intensification at an appropriate time could lead to clinical and economic benefits and should be investigated further.

Funding

Sanofi U.S., Inc.
Literature
1.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2017. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(Suppl. 1):S1–135.
2.
Garber AJ, et al. Consensus statement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology on the comprehensive type 2 diabetes management algorithm—2018 executive summary. Endocr Pract. 2018;24(1):91–120.CrossRef
3.
Garber AJ, Abrahamson MJ, Barzilay JI, et al. Consensus statement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology on the comprehensive type 2 diabetes management algorithm—2017 executive summary. Endocr Pract. 2017;23:207–38.CrossRef
4.
Brown JB, Nichols GA. Slow response to loss of glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Manag Care. 2003;9:213–7.PubMed
5.
Khunti K, Wolden ML, Thorsted BL, Andersen M, Davies MJ. Clinical inertia in people with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study of more than 80,000 people. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:3411–7.CrossRef
6.
Stark Casagrande S, Fradkin JE, Saydah SH, Rust KF, Cowie CC. The prevalence of meeting A1C, blood pressure, and LDL goals among people with diabetes, 1988–2010. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:2271–9.CrossRef
7.
Peyrot M, Rubin RR, Khunti K. Addressing barriers to initiation of insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Prim Care Diabetes. 2010;4(Suppl. 1):S11–8.CrossRef
8.
Lin J, Zhou S, Wei W, Pan C, Lingohr-Smith M, Levin P. Does clinical inertia vary by personalized A1C goal? A study of predictors and prevalence of clinical inertia in a U.S. managed-care setting. Endocr Pract. 2016;22:151–61.CrossRef
9.
Reach G. Patient non-adherence and healthcare-provider inertia are clinical myopia. Diabetes Metab J. 2008;34(4 pt 1):382–5.CrossRef
10.
Reach G, Pechtner V, Gentilella R, Corcos A, Ceriello A. Clinical inertia and its impact on treatment intensification in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab. 2017 (Epub ahead of print).
11.
Phillips L, Branch W, Cook C, et al. Clinical inertia. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135(9):825–34.CrossRef
12.
Grant RW, Cagliero E, Dubey AK, et al. Clinical inertia in the management of type 2 diabetes metabolic risk factors. Diabet Med. 2004;21:150–5.CrossRef
13.
Nichols GA, Koo YH, Shah SN. Delay of insulin addition to oral combination therapy despite inadequate glycemic control: delay of insulin therapy. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:453–8.CrossRef
14.
Roussel R, Gourdy P, Gautier JF, et al. Low rate of intensification in type 2 diabetic patients inadequately controlled with basal insulin: the INTERDIA study. Diabetes Manag. 2016;6:119–27.
15.
Wagner EH, Sandhu N, Newton KM, McCulloch DK, Ramsey SD, Grothaus LC. Effect of improved glycemic control on health care costs and utilization. JAMA. 2001;285:182–9.CrossRef
16.
Levin PA, Zhou S, Gill J, Wei W. Health outcomes associated with initiation of basal insulin after 1, 2, or ≥ 3 oral antidiabetes drug(s) among managed care patients with type 2 diabetes. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015;21:1172–81.PubMed
17.
Smolen HJ, Murphy DR, Gahn JC, Yu X, Curtis BH. The evaluation of clinical and cost outcomes associated with earlier initiation of insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014;20:968–84.PubMed
18.
Research Triangle Institute. Ethics and Human Research Protection Web site. www.​rti.​org/​ethics-and-human-research-protection. Accessed 19 Oct 2017.
19.
Health and Human Services. Code of Federal Regulations. Title 45—Public Welfare Department of Health and Human Services. Part 46—Protection of Human Subjects. www.​hhs.​gov/​ohrp/​regulations-and-policy/​regulations/​45-cfr-46/​index.​html. Accessed 19 Oct 2017.
20.
Bonafede M, Chandran A, DiMario S, Saltiel-Berzin R, Saliu D. Medication usage, treatment intensification, and medical cost in patients with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective database study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2016;4:e000189.CrossRef
21.
Mauricio D, Meneghini L, Seufert J, et al. Glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia burden in patients with type 2 diabetes initiating basal insulin in Europe and the USA. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19:1155–64.CrossRef
22.
Fu AZ, Sheehan JJ. Treatment intensification for patients with type 2 diabetes and poor glycaemic control. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016;18:892–8.CrossRef
23.
Ajmera M, Raval A, Zhou S, et al. A real-world observational study of time to treatment intensification among elderly patients with inadequately controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015;21:1184–93.PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Thayer S, Wei W, Buysman E, et al. The INITIATOR study: pilot data on real-world clinical and economic outcomes in US patients with type 2 diabetes initiating injectable therapy. Adv Ther. 2013;30:1128–40.CrossRef
25.
Levin P, Lin J, Wei W, et al. Initiating injectable therapy in US managed care patients with diabetes. Am J Pharm Benefits. 2014;6:e93–102.
26.
Davis SN, Wei W, Garg S. Clinical impact of initiating insulin glargine therapy with disposable pen versus vial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a managed care setting. Endocr Pract. 2011;17:845–52.CrossRef
27.
Dalal MR, Xie L, Baser O, DiGenio A. Adding rapid-acting insulin or GLP-1 receptor agonist to basal insulin: outcomes in a community setting. Endocr Pract. 2015;21:68–76.CrossRef
28.
Bieszk N, Reynolds SL, Wei W, Davis C, Kamble P, Uribe C. “Act on threes” paradigm for treatment intensification of type 2 diabetes in managed care: results of a randomized controlled study with an educational intervention targeting improved glycemic control. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016;22:1028–38.PubMed
29.
Ayyagari R, Wei W, Cheng D, Pan C, Signorovitch J, Wu EQ. Effect of adherence and insulin delivery system on clinical and economic outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes initiating insulin treatment. Value Health. 2015;18:198–205.CrossRef
30.
Riley GF. Administrative and claims records as sources of health care cost data. Med Care. 2009;47(7 Suppl. 1):S51–5.CrossRef
31.
Carls GS, Tuttle E, Tan RD, Huynh J, Yee J, Edelman SV, Polonsky WH. Understanding the gap between efficacy in randomized controlled trials and effectiveness in real-world use of GLP-1 RA and DPP-4 therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(11):1469–78.CrossRef
32.
Roussel R, Charbonnel B, Behar M, Gourmelen J, Emery C, Detournay B. Persistence with Insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes in France: an insurance claims study. Diabetes Ther. 2016;7:537–49.CrossRef

Be confident that your patient care is up to date

Medicine Matters is being incorporated into Springer Medicine, our new medical education platform. 

Alongside the news coverage and expert commentary you have come to expect from Medicine Matters diabetes, Springer Medicine's complimentary membership also provides access to articles from renowned journals and a broad range of Continuing Medical Education programs. Create your free account »