Skip to main content
Top

10-15-2018 | Statins | Review | Article

Beyond Statins: Who and When to Prescribe?

Journal: Current Diabetes Reports

Author: Om Ganda

Publisher: Springer US

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Statins are the most evidence-based therapy to target LDL-C to reduce atherosclerotic events. Yet, many people are unable to achieve adequate reduction in this key atherogenic factor. Moreover, residual risk of cardiovascular events may persist even after “optimal” LDL-C due to elevations in triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. Therefore, additional therapies beyond statins are needed, particularly in patients with diabetes.

Recent Findings

Clinical trials with ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors have reported further reductions in cardiovascular events, beyond statins. The latter are particularly effective in lowering LDL-cholesterol and in reducing event rates. However, they are not effective in lowering triglycerides. Currently available fibrates and niacin have not proven effective in combination with statins in clinical trials, while the top line results of the REDUCE-IT trial with EPA, a pure omega-3 fatty acid, reporting 25% relative risk reduction in primary endpoints are of great interest.

Summary

Recently approved agents have the promise to improve cardiovascular outcomes beyond statins. Many novel drugs in development have the potential to further improve prognosis.
Literature
1.
Gregg EW, Li Y, Wang J, Burrows NR, Ali MK, Rolka D, et al. Changes in diabetes-related complications in the United States, 1990-2010. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(16):1514–23.CrossRef
2.
• Burrows NR, Li Y, Gregg EW, Geiss LS. Declining rates of hospitalization for selected cardiovascular disease conditions among adults aged ≥ 35 years with diagnosed diabetes, U.S., 1998–2014. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(2):293–302. A recent analysis of improved prognosis of patients with cardiovascular complications; yet a reminder of persistently high prevalence of CV complications, particularly heart failure. CrossRef
3.
Gregg EW, Cheng YJ, Srinivasan M, Lin J, Geiss LS, Albright AL, et al. Trends in cause-specific mortality among adults with and without diagnosed diabetes in the USA: an epidemiological analysis of linked national survey and vital statistics data. Lancet. 2018;391(10138):2430–40.CrossRef
4.
Shah AD, Langenberg C, Rapsomaniki E, Denaxas S, Pujades-Rodriguez M, Gale CP, et al. Type 2 diabetes and incidence of cardiovascular diseases: a cohort study in 1.9 million people. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;3(2):105–13.
5.
Prospective Studies Collaboration and Asia Pacific Cohort Studies Collaboration. Sex-specific relevance of diabetes to occlusive vascular and other mortality: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual data from 980 793 adults from 68 prospective studies. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(7):538–46.CrossRef
6.
Rawshani A, Rawshani A, Franzén S, Eliasson B, Svensson A-M, Miftaraj M, et al. Mortality and cardiovascular disease in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(15):1407–18.CrossRef
7.
•• Rawshani A, Rawshani A, Franzén S, Sattar N, Eliasson B, Svensson A-M, et al. Risk factors, mortality, and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(7):633–44. An extensive case-control study of a large cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes, providing evidence for almost complete abrogation of increased cardiovascular events and mortality by control of all five major risk factors to target range. CrossRef
8.
Huxley RR, Peters SA, Mishra GD, Woodward M. Risk of all-cause mortality and vascular events in women versus men with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;3(3):198–206.CrossRef
9.
de Ferranti SD, de Boer IH, Fonseca V, Fox CS, Golden SH, Lavie CJ, et al. Type 1 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and American Diabetes Association. Circulation. 2014;130(13):1110–30.CrossRef
10.
Collins R, Reith C, Emberson J, Armitage J, Baigent C, Blackwell L, et al. Interpretation of the evidence for the efficacy and safety of statin therapy. Lancet. 2016;388(10059):2532–61.CrossRef
11.
Collaboration CTTC, Baigent C, Blackwell L, Emberson J, Holland LE, Reith C, et al. Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet. 2010;376(9753):1670–81.CrossRef
12.
Stone NJ, Robinson J, Lichtenstein AH, Merz CN, Blum CB, Eckel RH, et al. ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2013;2013
13.
• Hong KN, Fuster V, Rosenson RS, Rosendorff C, Bhatt DL. How low to go with glucose, cholesterol, and blood pressure in primary prevention of CVD. JACC. 2017a;70(17):2171–85. This review provides the current state of consensus and controversy regarding the optimal goals for glcemic, lipid, and blood pressure goals. CrossRef
14.
Ganda OP, Mitri J. Current consensus and controversies in guidelines for lipid and hypertension management in diabetes. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016;18(11):114.CrossRef
15.
DeGorter MK, Tirona RG, Schwarz UI, Choi YH, Dresser GK, Suskin N, et al. Clinical and pharmacogenetic predictors of circulating atorvastatin and rosuvastatin concentrations in routine clinical care. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2013;6(4):400–8.CrossRef
16.
Boekholdt SM, Hovingh GK, Mora S, Arsenault BJ, Amarenco P, Pedersen TR, et al. Very low levels of Atherogenic lipoproteins and the risk for cardiovascular events. A meta-analysis of statin trials. JACC. 2014;64(5):485–94.
17.
Jellinger PS, Handelsman Y, Rosenblit PD, Bloomgarden ZT, Fonseca VA, Garber AJ, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology Guidelines for Management of Dyslipidemia and Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease. Endocr Pract. 2017;23(Suppl 2):1–87.CrossRef
18.
Zhang H, Plutzky J, Ge W, Shubina M, Turchin A. Predictors of a successful statin reattempt after an adverse reaction. J Clin Lipidol. 2018;12(3):643–51.CrossRef
19.
Zhang H, Plutzky J, Shubina M, Turchin A. Continued statin prescriptions after adverse reactions and patient outcomes: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167(4):221–7.CrossRef
20.
•• Nissen SE. Statin intolerance: an elusive but morbid disorder. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(11):1396–8. This editorial summarizes objective evidence for statin intolerance based on various studies and the need to address this issue and options to reduce CV risk in such patients. CrossRef
21.
•• Ganda OP, Bhatt DL, Mason RP, Miller M, Boden WE. Unmet need for adjunctive dyslipidemia therapy in hypertriglyceridemia management. JACC. 2018a;72(3):330–43. A recent state of the art review describing residual risk despite optimal LDL-C management based on genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical trial evidence and how to address this issue in clinical management. CrossRef
22.
Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Giugliano RP, McCagg A, White JA, Theroux P, et al. Ezetimibe added to statin therapy after acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(25):2387–97.CrossRef
23.
•• Giugliano RP, Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Nicolau JC, Corbalan R, Spinar J, et al. Benefit of adding ezetimibe to statin therapy on cardiovascular outcomes and safety in patients with versus without diabetes mellitus: results from IMPROVE-IT (Improved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial). Circulation. 2018;137(15):1571–82. The subgroup analysis of the IMPROVE-IT trial ( ref no. 22), describing the differences in outcomes in the pre-specified, diabetes cohort, compared to those with pre-diabetes or normal glucose. Patients with diabetes had markedly superior outcome, compared to non-diabetics. CrossRef
24.
Ganda OP, Garg A. Dyslipidemias Pathophysiology, Evaluation and Management. Contemporary Endocrinology. In: Garg A, editor. Bile acid sequestrants: role in treating dyslipidemias and risk-benefits. New York: Humana Press; 2015. p. 453–64.
25.
Preiss D, Mafham M. PCSK9 inhibition: the dawn of a new age in cholesterol lowering? Diabetologia. 2017;60(3):381–9.CrossRef
26.
Bergeron N, Phan BA, Ding Y, Fong A, Krauss RM. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibition: a new therapeutic mechanism for reducing cardiovascular disease risk. Circulation. 2015;132(17):1648–66.CrossRef
27.
•• Rosenson RS, Hegele RA, Fazio S, Cannon CP. The evolving future of PCSK9 inhibitors. JACC. 2018;72(3):314–29. The most recent comprehensive review of PCSK 9 biology , pathophysiology, and management issues. CrossRef
28.
Karatasakis A, Danek BA, Karacsonyi J, Rangan BV, Roesle MK, Knickelbine T, et al. Effect of PCSK9 inhibitors on clinical outcomes in patients with hypercholesterolemia: a meta-analysis of 35 randomized controlled trials. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(12).
29.
•• Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC, Honarpour N, Wiviott SD, Murphy SA, et al. Evolocumab and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2017a;376(18):1713–22. A landmark paper descibing the CV outcomes in the first RCT with PCSK 9 inhibitor, evolocumab. CrossRef
30.
Schwartz GG, Bessac L, Berdan LG, Bhatt DL, Bittner V, Diaz R, et al. Effect of alirocumab, a monoclonal antibody to PCSK9, on long-term cardiovascular outcomes following acute coronary syndromes: rationale and design of the ODYSSEY outcomes trial. Am Heart J. 2014;168(5):682–9.CrossRef
31.
Giugliano RP, Mach F, Zavitz K, Kurtz C, Im K, Kanevsky E, et al. Cognitive function in a randomized trial of Evolocumab. N Engl J Med. 2017a;377(7):633–43.CrossRef
32.
Giugliano RP, Pedersen TR, Park JG, De Ferrari GM, Gaciong ZA, Ceska R, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of achieving very low LDL-cholesterol concentrations with the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab: a prespecified secondary analysis of the FOURIER trial. Lancet. 2017b;390(10106):1962–71.CrossRef
33.
Sabatine MS, Leiter LA, Wiviott SD, Giugliano RP, Deedwania P, De Ferrari GM, et al. Cardiovascular safety and efficacy of the PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab in patients with and without diabetes and the effect of evolocumab on glycaemia and risk of new-onset diabetes: a prespecified analysis of the FOURIER randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017b;5(12):941–50.CrossRef
34.
Ganda OP. Statin-induced diabetes: incidence, mechanisms, and implications. F1000Research. 2016;5.CrossRef
35.
Wang S, Cai R, Yuan Y, Varghese Z, Moorhead J, Ruan XZ. Association between reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol with statin therapy and the risk of new-onset diabetes: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:39982.CrossRef
36.
•• Maki KC. The ODYSSEY Outcomes trial: clinical implications and exploration of the limits of what can be achieved through lipid lowering. J Clin Lipidol. 2018 Jun 1. pii: S1933–2874(18)30245–9. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jacl.​2018.​05.​016. A summary of the principal findings of the second RCT with alirocumab, presented at the ACC annual meetings in 2018. CrossRef
37.
Ray KK, Leiter LA, Muller-Wieland D, Cariou B, Colhoun HM, Henry RR, et al. Alirocumab vs usual lipid-lowering care as add-on to statin therapy in individuals with type 2 diabetes and mixed dyslipidaemia: the ODYSSEY DM-DYSLIPIDEMIA randomized trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(6):1479–89.CrossRef
38.
Ganda OP, Plutzky J, Sanganalmath SK, Bujas-Bobanovic M, Koren A, Mandel J, et al. Efficacy and safety of alirocumab among individuals with diabetes mellitus and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in the ODYSSEY phase 3 trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20 (10): 2389–2398CrossRef
39.
•• Lloyd-Jones DM, Morris PB, Ballantyne CM, Birtcher KK, Daly DD Jr, De Palma SM, et al. 2017 focused update of the 2016 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on the Role of Non-Statin Therapies for LDL-Cholesterol Lowering in the Management of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Expert Consensus Decision Pathways. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(14):1785–822. A position statement by the ACC expert panel regarding the risk category and the use of PCSK inhibitors in clinical practice. CrossRef
40.
Orringer CE, Jacobson TA, Saseen JJ, Brown AS, Gotto AM, Ross JL, et al. Update on the use of PCSK9 inhibitors in adults: recommendations from an Expert Panel of the National Lipid Association. J Clin Lipidol. 2017;11(4):880–90.CrossRef
41.
Ray KK, Landmesser U, Leiter LA, Kallend D, Dufour R, Karakas M, et al. Inclisiran in patients at high cardiovascular risk with elevated LDL cholesterol. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(15):1430–40.CrossRef
42.
• Superko HR, Zhao X-Q, Hodis HN, Guyton JR. Niacin and heart disease prevention: engraving its tombstone is a mistake. J Clin Lipidol. 2017;11(6):1309–17. A detailed discussion of older and recent angiographic studies and clinical trials with niacin. CrossRef
43.
Cuchel M, Bruckert E, Ginsberg HN, Raal FJ, Santos RD, Hegele RA, et al. Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: new insights and guidance for clinicians to improve detection and clinical management. A position paper from the Consensus Panel on Familial Hypercholesterolaemia of the European Atherosclerosis Society. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(32):2146–57.CrossRef
44.
Blom DJ, Averna MR, Meagher EA, du Toit TH, Sirtori CR, Hegele RA, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of the microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor lomitapide in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Circulation. 2017;136(3):332–5.CrossRef
45.
Sacks FM, Stanesa M, Hegele RA. Severe hypertriglyceridemia with pancreatitis: thirteen years’ treatment with lomitapide. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(3):443–7.CrossRef
46.
Santos RD, Raal FJ, Donovan JM, Cromwell WC. Mipomersen preferentially reduces small low-density lipoprotein particle number in patients with hypercholesterolemia. J Clin Lipidol. 2015;9(2):201–9.CrossRef
47.
• Thompson PD, Rubino J, Janik MJ, MacDougall DE, McBride SJ, Margulies JR, et al. Use of ETC-1002 to treat hypercholesterolemia in patients with statin intolerance. J Clin Lipidol. 2015;9(3):295–304. A promising new agent to treat hyperlipidemia , currently in clinical trials. CrossRef
48.
Stein E, Bays H, Koren M, Bakker-Arkema R, Bisgaier C. Efficacy and safety of gemcabene as add-on to stable statin therapy in hypercholesterolemic patients. J Clin Lipidol. 2016;10(5):1212–22.CrossRef
49.
Stitziel NO, Khera AV, Wang X, Bierhals AJ, Vourakis AC, Sperry AE, et al. ANGPTL3 deficiency and protection against coronary artery disease. JACC. 2017;69(16):2054–63.CrossRef
50.
Taub R, Chiang E, Chabot-Blanchet M, Kelly MJ, Reeves RA, Guertin MC, et al. Lipid lowering in healthy volunteers treated with multiple doses of MGL-3196, a liver-targeted thyroid hormone receptor-beta agonist. Atherosclerosis. 2013;230(2):373–80.CrossRef
51.
Dujovne CA. Red yeast rice preparations: are they suitable substitutions for statins? Am J Med. 2017;130(10):1148–50.CrossRef
52.
Sarwar N, Sandhu MS, Ricketts SL, Butterworth AS, Di Angelantonio E, Boekholdt SM, et al. Triglyceride-mediated pathways and coronary disease: collaborative analysis of 101 studies. Lancet. 2010;375(9726):1634–9.CrossRef
53.
Nordestgaard BG, Varbo A. Triglycerides and cardiovascular disease. Lancet. 2014;384(9943):626–35.CrossRef
54.
Musunuru K, Kathiresan S. Surprises from genetic analyses of lipid risk factors for atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 2016;118(4):579–85.CrossRef
55.
Miller M, Cannon CP, Murphy SA, Qin J, Ray KK, Braunwald E. Impact of triglyceride levels beyond low-density lipoprotein cholesterol after acute coronary syndrome in the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 trial. JACC. 2008;51(7):724–30.CrossRef
56.
Vallejo-Vaz AJ, Fayyad R, Boekholdt SM, Hovingh GK, Kastelein JJ, Melamed S, et al. Triglyceride-rich lipoprotein cholesterol and risk of cardiovascular events among patients receiving statin therapy in the Treating to New Targets (TNT) trial. Circulation. 2018:CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032318.
57.
Nichols GA, Philip S, Reynolds K, Granowitz CB, Fazio S. Increased cardiovascular risk in hypertriglyceridemic patients with statin-controlled LDL cholesterol. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;
58.
Toth PP, Granowitz C, Hull M, Liasson D, Anderson A, Philip S. High triglycerides are associated with increased cardiovascular events, medical costs, and resource use: a real-world administrative claims analysis of statin-treated patients with high residual cardiovascular risk. J Amer Heart Assoc. 2018:1–11.
59.
• Effects of combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2010. The only RCT of a fibrate in combination with statin therapy and cardiovascular outcomes.
60.
Araki E, Yamashita S, Arai H, Yokote K, Satoh J, Inoguchi T, et al. Effects of pemafibrate, a novel selective PPARα modulator, on lipid and glucose metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertriglyceridemia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(3):538–46.CrossRef
61.
• HPS2-THRIVE Collaborative Group, Landray MJ, Haynes R, Hopewell JC, Parish S, Aung T, et al. Effects of extended-release niacin with laropiprant in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(3):203–12. This and no. 62 are the two RCTs of niacin in combination with statin therapy and cardiovascular outcomes.
62.
• AIM-HIGH Investigators, Boden WE, Probstfield JL, Anderson T, Chaitman BR, Desvignes-Nickens P, et al. Niacin in patients with low HDL cholesterol levels receiving intensive statin therapy. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(24):2255–67. This and no. 61 are the two RCTs of niacin in combination with statin therapy and cardiovascular outcomes.
63.
Group THTRC. Effects of Anacetrapib in patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(13):1217–27.CrossRef
64.
•• Sansbury BE, Spite M. Resolution of acute inflammation and the role of resolvins in immunity, thrombosis, and vascular biology. Circ Res. 2016;119(1):113–30. A comprehensive mechanistic review of the role of inflammation and the concepts underlying biology of resolvins in inflammation resolution. CrossRef
65.
•• Borow KM, Nelson JR, Mason RP. Biologic plausibility, cellular effects, and molecular mechanisms of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) in atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 2015;242(1):357–66. A review of molecular basis of anti-atheroscerotic effects of omega-3 fatty acids, with special emphasis on potentially unique benefits of EPA. CrossRef
66.
Sherratt SCR, Mason RP. Eicosapentaenoic acid inhibits oxidation of high density lipoprotein particles in a manner distinct from docosahexaenoic acid. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;496(2):335–8.CrossRef
67.
Aung T, Halsey J, Kromhout D, Gerstein HC, Marchioli R, Tavazzi L, et al. Associations of omega-3 fatty acid supplement use with cardiovascular disease risks: Meta-analysis of 10 trials involving 77 917 individuals. JAMA cardiology. 2018;3:225–34.CrossRef
68.
Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Brinton EA, Jacobson TA, Miller M, Tardif J-C, et al. Rationale and design of REDUCE-IT: Reduction of Cardiovascular Events with Icosapent Ethyl–Intervention Trial. Clin Cardiol. 2017;40(3):138–48.CrossRef
69.
•• REDUCE-IT™ CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES STUDY OF VASCEPA® (ICOSAPENT ETHYL) CAPSULES MET PRIMARY ENDPOINT. https://​investor.​amarincorp.​com/​news-releases/​news-release-details/​reduce-ittm-cardiovascular-outcomes-study-vascepar-icosapent. Accessed 24 Sept 2018. Topline results of the highly significant cardiovascular outcomes from the long-term, multicenter trial, REDUCE-IT
70.
Ascend Study Collaborative Group. Effects of n-3fatty acid supplements in diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2018. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1056/​NEJMoa1804989
71.
TG T, HDL Working Group of the Exome Sequencing Project NH, Lung, Institute B. Loss-of-function mutations in APOC3, triglycerides, and coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2014;371(1):22–31.
72.
Jørgensen AB, Frikke-Schmidt R, Nordestgaard BG, Tybjærg-Hansen A. Loss-of-function mutations in APOC3 and risk of ischemic vascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(1):32–41.CrossRef
73.
Gaudet D, Alexander VJ, Baker BF, Brisson D, Tremblay K, Singleton W, et al. Antisense inhibition of apolipoprotein C-III in patients with hypertriglyceridemia. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(5):438–47.CrossRef
74.
• Digenio A, Dunbar RL, Alexander VJ, Hompesch M, Morrow L, Lee RG, et al. Antisense-mediated lowering of plasma apolipoprotein C-III by Volanesorsen improves dyslipidemia and insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(8):1408–15. A study of the metabolic effects of a promising novel agent for intensive treatment in severe hypertriglyceridemia. CrossRef
75.
Olshan DS, Rader DJ. Angiopoietin-like protein 4: a therapeutic target for triglycerides and coronary disease? J Clin Lipidol. 2018.
76.
Dewey FE, Gusarova V, Dunbar RL, O’Dushlaine C, Schurmann C, Gottesman O, et al. Genetic and pharmacologic inactivation of ANGPTL3 and cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(3):211–21.CrossRef
77.
Dewey FE, Gusarova V, O’Dushlaine C, Gottesman O, Trejos J, Hunt C, et al. Inactivating variants in ANGPTL4 and risk of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(12):1123–33.CrossRef
78.
Khera AV, Won HH, Peloso GM, O'Dushlaine C, Liu D, Stitziel NO, et al. Association of rare and common variation in the lipoprotein lipase gene with coronary artery disease. JAMA. 2017;317(9):937–46.CrossRef
79.
Gaudet D, Brisson D, Tremblay K, Alexander VJ, Singleton W, Hughes SG, et al. Targeting APOC3 in the familial chylomicronemia syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(23):2200–6.CrossRef
80.
Khunti K, Ceriello A, Cos X, De Block C. Achievement of guideline targets for blood pressure, lipid, and glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;137:137–48.CrossRef

Be confident that your patient care is up to date

Medicine Matters is being incorporated into Springer Medicine, our new medical education platform. 

Alongside the news coverage and expert commentary you have come to expect from Medicine Matters diabetes, Springer Medicine's complimentary membership also provides access to articles from renowned journals and a broad range of Continuing Medical Education programs. Create your free account »