Skip to main content
Top

06-06-2017 | Specific populations | Article

Trends in sex differences in the receipt of quality of care indicators among adults with diabetes: United States 2002-2011

Journal: BMC Endocrine Disorders

Authors: Joni S. Williams, Kinfe G. Bishu, Alessandra St. Germain, Leonard E. Egede

Publisher: BioMed Central

Abstract

Background

Evidence suggests disparities in quality of care (QoC) indicators based on sex exist in adults diagnosed with diabetes; however, this research is limited. Therefore, the objective of this research study was to assess differences in QOC indicators in a nationally representative sample of men and women with diabetes.

Methods

Cross-sectional study of 17,702 men and women (≥18 years of age) with diabetes from the 2002–2011 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Household Component. Sex was the main predictor variable, and the dependent variables were five binary indicators to measure QOC, which included testing of hemoglobin A1c, examining feet annually, getting eyes dilated, checking blood pressure, and visiting the doctor annually. Sample demographics by sex were assessed. Unadjusted analyses were computed for descriptive statistics by sex and proportions of QOC indicators over time. Logistic regression evaluated associations between QOC indicators and sex, while controlling for sociodemographic characteristics, time, and comorbid conditions.

Results

Approximately 44% and 56% of the sample was comprised of men and women, respectively. Unadjusted analyses showed significant differences in A1c testing (p < 0.001) and foot examinations (p = 0.002) for the entire sample, and significant differences in A1c testing (p = 0.027), foot examinations (p = 0.01), and dilated eye exams (p = 0.026) among men and A1c testing (p < 0.001) among women overtime. Adjusted analyses found women to be significantly more likely to have dilated eye examinations during a given year (OR = 1.14; 95% CI 1.04, 1.24), to get their blood pressure checked by a doctor in a given year (OR = 1.44; 95% CI 1.13, 1.84), and to visit a doctor annually (OR = 1.39; 95% CI 1.22, 1.58) compared to men.

Conclusions

In this sample of adults with diabetes, women had significantly higher odds of receiving quality of care compared to men. These findings suggest the importance of educating patients about appropriate metrics of diabetes management, especially men, and the need for continuous empowerment of women to receive proper and optimal care. Additional research is needed to identify causes and reduce sex and gender disparities associated with diabetes quality of care.
Literature
1.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes statistics report: estimates of diabetes and its burden in the United States, 2014. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2014.
2.
Zhuo X, Zhang P, Hoerger J. Lifetime direct medical costs of treating type 2 diabetes and diabetic complications. Am J Prev Med. 2013;45(3):253–61.CrossRefPubMed
3.
American Diabetes Association. The Cost of Diabetes. 2013. Available from http://​www.​diabetes.​org/​advocacy/​news-events/​cost-of-diabetes.​html. Web accessed 13 June 2016.
4.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2016. Published 2016.http://​care.​diabetesjournals​.​org/​content/​suppl/​2015/​12/​21/​39.​Supplement_​1.​DC2/​2016-Standards-of-Care.​pdf. Web accessed 26 July 2016.
5.
Russo GT, Horvath KV, Di Benedetto A, Giandalia A, Cucinotta D, Asztalos B. Influence of menopause and cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) TaqIB polymorphism on lipid profile and HDL subpopulations distribution in women with and without type 2 diabetes. Atherosclerosis. 2010;210(1):294–301.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Kautzky-Willer A, Harreiter J, Pacini G. Sex and gender differences in risk, pathophysiology and complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Endocr Rev. 2016;37(3):278–316.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
American Diabetes Association. Strategies for improving care. Sec. 1. In Standards of Medical Care in Diabetesd2016. Diabetes Care. 2016;39 Suppl 1:S6–S12.
8.
Bayer FJ, Galusha D, Slade M, Chu IM, Taiwo O, Cullen MR, et al. Process of care compliance is associated with fewer diabetes complications. Am J Manag Care. 2014;20(1):41–52.PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Sidorov J, Shull R, Tomcavage J, Girolami S, Lawton N, Harris R. Does diabetes disease management save money and improve outcomes? a report of simultaneous short-term savings and quality improvement associated with a health maintenance organization-sponsored disease management program among patients fulfilling health employer data and information set criteria. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(4):684–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Harman JS, Scholle SH, Ng JH, Pawlson LG, Mardon RE, Haffer SC, et al. Association of health plans’ healthcare effectiveness data and information set (HEDIS) performance with outcomes of enrollees with diabetes. Med Care. 2010;48(3):217–23.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Correa-de-Araujo R, McDermott K, Moy E. Gender differences across racial and ethnic groups in the quality of care for diabetes. Women’s Health Issues. 2006;16(2):56–65.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Chou AF, Brown AF, Jensenc RE, Shih S, Pawlson G, Scholle SH. Gender and racial disparities in the management of diabetes mellitus among Medicare patients. Women’s Health Issues. 2007;17(3):150–61.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Rossi MC, Cristofaro MR, Gentile S, Lucisano G, Manicardi V, Mulas MF, et al. Sex disparities in the quality of diabetes care: biological and cultural factors may play a different role for different outcomes. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:3162–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Yu MK, Lyles CR, Bent-Shaw LA, Young BA. Sex disparities in diabetes processes of care measures and self-care in high-risk patients. J Diab Res. 2013;2013:575814.
15.
Tseng C, Sambamoorthi U, Rajan M, Tiwari A, Frayne S, Findley P, et al. Are there gender differences in diabetes care among elderly Medicare enrolled Veterans? J Gen Int Med. 2006;21:S47–53.CrossRef
16.
Correa-de-Araujo R, Clancy CM. Catalyzing quality of care improvements for women. Women’s Health Issues. 2006;16:41–3.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Bird CE, Fremont AM, Bierman AS, Wickstrom S, Shah M, Rector T, et al. Does quality of care for cardiovascular disease and diabetes differ by gender for enrollees in managed care plans? Women’s Health Issues. 2007;17:131–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQa). Methodology Report # 27, Sample design of the 2011 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Insurance Component 2013a, Available from http://​meps.​ahrq.​gov/​data_​files/​publications/​mr27/​mr27.​pdf. Accessed 22 Aug 2014.
19.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQb). Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2011 Medical conditions 2013b, Available from http://​meps.​ahrq.​gov/​mepsweb/​data_​stats/​download_​data/​pufs/​h146/​h146doc.​pdf Accessed 20 Aug 2014
20.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQc). Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. 2011 Full year consolidated data file 2013c, Available from http://​meps.​ahrq.​gov/​mepsweb/​data_​stats/​download_​data_​files.​jsp. Accessed 18 Aug 2014.
21.
Archer KJ, Lemeshow S. Goodness-of-fit test for a logistic regression model fitted using survey sample data. Stata J. 2006;6(1):97–105.
22.
Musman S, Passos VMA, Silva IBR, Barreto SM. Evaluation of a prediction model for sleep apnea in patients submitted to polysomnography. J Bras Pneumol. 2011;37(1):75–84.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Cameroon AC, Trivedi PK. Microeconometrics using stata. College Station, Texas: StataCorp LP; 2010.
24.
StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station, TX: StataCorp, LP; 2015.
25.
Bertakis KD, Azari R, Helms LJ, Callahan EJ, Robbins JA. Gender differences in the utilization of health care services. J Fam Pract. 2000;49(2):147–52.PubMed
26.
Bertakis KD, Azari R. Patient gender differences in the prediction of medical expenditures. J Women's Health (Larchmt). 2010;19(10):1925–32.CrossRef
27.
Cohen SB, Ezzati-Rice T, Yu W. The utility of extended longitudinal profiles I predicting future health care expenditures. Med Care. 2006;44(5 Suppl):I45–53.PubMed
28.
Leslie LA, Swider SM. Changing factors and changing needs of women’s health care. Nurs Clin North Am. 1986;21(1):111–23.PubMed
29.
Kosiak B, Sangl J, Correa-de-Araujo R. Quality of health care for older women: what do we know? Women’s Health Issues. 2006;16:89–99.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Strom Williams JL, Lynch CP, Winchester R, Thomas L, Keith B, Egede LE. Gender differences in composite control of cardiovascular risk factors among patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014;16(7):421–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Owens GM. Gender differences in health care expenditures, resource utilization, and quality of care. J Manag Care Pharm. 2008;14(Suppl S):S2–6.
32.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diabetes report card 2014. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2015.
33.
Saaddine JB, Cadwell B, Gregg EW, Engelgau MM, Vinicor F, Imperatore G, et al. Improvements in diabetes processes of care and intermediate outcomes: United States, 1988-2002. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:465–74.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Ali MK, Bullard KM, Saaddine JB, Cowie CC, Imperatore G, Gregg EW. Achievement of goals in U.S. diabetes care, 1999-2010. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1613–24.CrossRefPubMed
35.
O’Brien KE, Chandramohan V, Nelson DA, Fischer JR, Stevens G, Poremba JA. Effect of a physician-directed educational campaign on performance of proper diabetic foot exams in an outpatient setting. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(4):258–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Barshes NR, Sigireddi M, Wrobel JS, Mahankali A., Robbins JM, Kougias P et al. The system of care for the diabetic foot: objectives, outcomes, and opportunities. Diabetic Foot Ankle. 2013;4. 10.​3402/​dfa.​v4i0.​21847.

Be confident that your patient care is up to date

Medicine Matters is being incorporated into Springer Medicine, our new medical education platform. 

Alongside the news coverage and expert commentary you have come to expect from Medicine Matters diabetes, Springer Medicine's complimentary membership also provides access to articles from renowned journals and a broad range of Continuing Medical Education programs. Create your free account »