Skip to main content
Top

06-15-2018 | Semaglutide | Article

Semaglutide s.c. Once-Weekly in Type 2 Diabetes: A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis

Journal: Diabetes Therapy

Authors: Kristin Cecilie Carlsson Petri, Steen Hvass Ingwersen, Anne Flint, Jeppe Zacho, Rune Viig Overgaard

Publisher: Springer Healthcare

Abstract

Introduction

Semaglutide, a new treatment option approved for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, is a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist to be injected subcutaneously once weekly. This analysis used a population pharmacokinetic model of semaglutide to identify clinically relevant covariates for exposure.

Methods

A total of 1612 patients with up to seven pharmacokinetic observations each were included in the analysis. All subjects had type 2 diabetes mellitus and were enrolled in one of five trials in the phase III development program for subcutaneous semaglutide once weekly (the SUSTAIN program). The treatment duration of the trials varied from 30 to 104 weeks.

Results

No clinically relevant effects on the exposure were seen for sex, age, race, ethnicity, renal function, or injection site used, and semaglutide exposure was stable over time. Of the covariates chosen, only body weight had a relevant effect on the exposure of semaglutide. Few subjects developed semaglutide antibodies, and the antibodies had no effect on exposure. Dose proportionality was shown for the 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg maintenance doses of semaglutide.

Conclusion

The population pharmacokinetic study showed that semaglutide exposure is not affected by covariates other than body weight at either a maintenance dose of 0.5 or 1.0 mg semaglutide. Therefore, we conclude that no semaglutide dose adjustments are needed in different populations. This finding is to be further explored in an exposure-response analysis.

Trial Registration

The trials were registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifiers: NCT02054897, NCT01930188, NCT01885208, NCT01720446 and NCT02207374).

Funding

Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsværd, Denmark.
Literature
1.
Collaboration NCDRF. Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4.4 million participants. Lancet. 2016;387:1513–30.
2.
International Diabetes Federation. IDF diabetes atlas. 7th ed. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation; 2015.
3.
Giovannucci E, Harlan DM, Archer MC, Bergenstal RM, Gapstur SM, Habel LA, et al. Diabetes and cancer: a consensus report. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:1674–85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Laakso M. Cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes from population to man to mechanisms: the Kelly West Award Lecture 2008. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:442–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Noto H, Tsujimoto T, Sasazuki T, Noda M. Significantly increased risk of cancer in patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EndocrPract. 2011;17:616–28.
6.
Barone BB, Yeh HC, Snyder CF, Peairs KS, Stein KB, Derr RL, et al. Long-term all-cause mortality in cancer patients with preexisting diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008;300:2754–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Wexler D, Grant R, Wittenberg E, Bosch J, Cagliero E, Delahanty L, et al. Correlates of health-related quality of life in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2006;49:1489–97.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Holst JJ, Vilsbøll T, Deacon CF. The incretin system and its role in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2009;297:127–36.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Kieffer TJ, Habener JF. The glucagon-like peptides. Endocr Rev. 1999;20:876–913.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Flint A, Raben A, Astrup A, Holst JJ. Glucagon-like peptide 1 promotes satiety and suppresses energy intake in humans. J Clin Invest. 1998;101:515–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Meier JJ. GLP-1 receptor agonists for individualized treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2012;8:728–42.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Lau J, Bloch P, Schäffer L, Pettersson I, Spetzler J, Kofoed J, et al. Discovery of the once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue semaglutide. J Med Chem. 2015;58:7370–80.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Sorli CHS, Harashima SI, Tsoukas GM, Unger J, Karsbol JD, Hansen T, Bain SC. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide monotherapy versus placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 1): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multinational, multicentre phase 3a trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:251–60.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Ahrén B, Comas LM, Kumar H, Sargin M, Derving Karsbøl J, Jacobsen SH, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus sitagliptin as an add-on to metformin, thiazolidinediones, or both, in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 2): a 56-week, double-blind, phase 3a, randomised trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:341–54.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Ahmann AJ, Capehorn M, Charpentier G, Dotta F, Henkel E, Lingvay I, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus exenatide ER in subjects with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 3): A 56-week, open-label, randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2018;41:258–66.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Aroda VR, Bain SC, Cariou B, Piletic M, Rose L, Axelsen M, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus once-daily insulin glargine as add-on to metformin (with or without sulfonylureas) in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 4): a randomised, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre, multinational, phase 3a trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:355–66.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Rodbard HW, Lingvay I, Reed J, de la Rosa R, Rose L, Sugimoto D, et al. Semaglutide added to basal insulin in type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 5): a randomized, controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103:2291–301.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Seino Y, Terauchi Y, Osonoi T, Yabe D, Abe N, Nishida T, et al. Safety and efficacy of semaglutide once weekly versus sitagliptin once daily, both as monotherapy in Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20:378–88.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Marso SP, Bain SC, Consoli A, Eliaschewitz FG, Jódar E, Leiter LA, et al. Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1834–44.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Kaku K, Yamada Y, Watada H, Abido A, Nishida T, Zacho J, Kiyosue A. Safety and efficacy of once-weekly semaglutide vs additional oral antidiabetic drugs in Japanese people with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20:1202–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
World Medical Association. WMA Declaration of Helsinki—Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Last amended by the 64th WMA General Assembly, Fortaleza, Brazil. 2013. https://​www.​wma.​net/​policies-post/​wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/​. Accessed 08 Mar 2018.
22.
International Conference of Harmonisation. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline E6(R1): Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. 1996. https://​www.​ich.​org/​fileadmin/​Public_​Web_​Site/​ICH_​Products/​Guidelines/​Efficacy/​E6/​E6_​R1_​Guideline.​pdf. Accessed 08 Mar 2018.
23.
Nauck MA, Petrie JR, Sesti G, Mannucci E, Courrèges JP, Lindegaard ML, et al. A phase 2, randomized, dose-finding study of the novel once-weekly human GLP-1 analog, semaglutide, compared with placebo and open-label liraglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:231–41.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Kapitza C, Nosek L, Jensen L, Hartvig H, Jensen CB, Flint A. Semaglutide, a once-weekly human GLP-1 analog, does not reduce the bioavailability of the combined oral contraceptive, ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel. J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;55:497–504.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Hu C, Zhang J, Zhou H. Confirmatory analysis for phase III population pharmacokinetics. Pharm Stat. 2011;10:14–26.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Marshall SF, Marshall S, Burghaus R, Cosson V, Cheung SY, Chenel M, et al. Good practices in model-informed drug discovery and development: practice, application, and documentation. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2016;5:93–122.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Nguyen NT, Nguyen XM, Lane J, Wang P. Relationship between obesity and diabetes in a US adult population: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2006. Obes Surg. 2011;21:351–5.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Gatineau M, Hancock C, Holman N, Outhwaite H, Oldridge L, Christie A, et al. Adult obesity and type 2 diabetes. In: England PH, editor. London: Public Health England; 2014.
29.
Lindbom L, Pihlgren P, Jonsson EN. PsN-Toolkit—a collection of computer intensive statistical methods for non-linear mixed effect modeling using NONMEM. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2005;79:241–57.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Lindbom L, Ribbing J, Jonsson EN. Perl-speaks-NONMEM (PsN)—a Perl module for NONMEM related programming. Comput Methods Progr Biomed. 2004;75:85–94.CrossRef
31.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). Guidance for Industry. Population Pharmacokinetics. 1999. https://​www.​fda.​gov/​downloads/​drugs/​guidances/​UCM072137.​pdf. Accessed 08 Mar 2018.
32.
European Medicines Agency, Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Guideline on reporting the results of population pharmacokinetic analyses (CHMP/EWP/185990/06). 21 June 2007. http://​www.​ema.​europa.​eu/​docs/​en_​GB/​document_​library/​Scientific_​guideline/​2009/​09/​WC500003067.​pdf. Accessed 08 Mar 2018.
33.
Overgaard RV, Petri KC, Jacobsen LV, Jensen CB. Liraglutide 3.0 mg for weight management: a population pharmacokinetic analysis. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016;55:1413–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Jacobsen LV, Flint A, Olsen AK, Ingwersen SH. Liraglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016;55:657–72.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Geiser JS, Heathman MA, Cui X, Martin J, Loghin C, Chien JY, et al. Clinical pharmacokinetics of dulaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: analyses of data from clinical trials. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2015;55:625–34.CrossRef
36.
Cirincione B, Mager DE. Population pharmacokinetics of exenatide. Pharmacokinetics. 2016;83:517–26.
37.
Jensen L, Kupčová V, Arold G, Pettersson J, Hjerpsted JB. Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of semaglutide in people with hepatic impairment. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20:998–1005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Marbury TC, Flint A, Jacbosen JB, Karsbøl JD, Lasseter K. Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of a single dose of semaglutide, a human glucagon-like peptide-1 analog, in subjects with and without renal impairment. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017;56:1381–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Be confident that your patient care is up to date

Medicine Matters is being incorporated into Springer Medicine, our new medical education platform. 

Alongside the news coverage and expert commentary you have come to expect from Medicine Matters diabetes, Springer Medicine's complimentary membership also provides access to articles from renowned journals and a broad range of Continuing Medical Education programs. Create your free account »