Skip to main content
Top

07-16-2015 | Retinopathy | Book chapter | Article

Diabetic retinopathy screening

Authors: Elias Reichel, David Salz

Abstract

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) has become increasingly common as the prevalence of diabetes has increased. Early detection of DR is crucial to preventing blindness from the disease, although often with early retinopathy, the vision may not be affected and the patient may be asymptomatic. Currently, adherence to retinopathy screening is subpar and multifactorial in nature.

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) has become increasingly common as the prevalence of diabetes has increased. Early detection of DR is crucial to preventing blindness from the disease, although often with early retinopathy, the vision may not be affected and the patient may be asymptomatic. Currently, adherence to retinopathy screening is subpar and multifactorial in nature. At least 35% of patients do not follow vision care guidelines and patients who are less likely to be compliant tend to be young, have type 2 diabetes, and have no formal diabetes education [1]. Despite an increase in the number of patients with this disease, it is important that all patients have access to appropriate DR screening. 

Literature
  1. Schoenfeld ER, Greene JM, Wu SY, et al. Patterns of adherence to diabetes vision care guidelines: baseline findings from the Diabetic Retinopathy Awareness Program. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:563-571.
  2. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes – 2014. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(suppl 1):S14-S80.
  3. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Treatment techniques and clinical guidelines for photocoagulation of diabetic macular edema. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study report number 2. Ophthalmology. 1987;94:761-774.
  4. American Academy of Ophthalmology Retinal Panel. Preferred Practice Patter Guidelines. Diabetic Retinopathy. San Francisco, CA: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2008. www.​aao.​org/​ppp. Accessed February 4, 2015.
  5. Wilkinson CP, Ferris FL III, Klein RE, et al. Proposed international clinical diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema severity scales. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:1679.
  6. Witmer MT, Parlitsis G, Patel S, Kiss S. The clinical utility of ultra-wide-field imaging. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:389-394.
  7. Li Z, Wu C, Olayiwola JN, et al. Telemedicine-based digital retinal imaging vs standard ophthalmologic evaluation for the assessment of diabetic retinopathy. Conn Med. 2012;76:85-90.
  8. Williams GA, Scott IU, Haller JA, et al. Single-field fundus photography for diabetic retinopathy screening: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1055-1062.
  9. Gass JDM, Sever, RJ, Sparks D, Goren J. A combined technique of fluorescein fundoscopy and angiography of the eye. Arch Ophthalmol. 1967;78:455-461.
  10. Saine PJ, Tyler ME. Fundus Photography Overview. Ophthalmic Photography: Retinal Photography, Angiography, and Electronic Imaging. 2nd edn. Boston, Massachusetts: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2001.
  11. Ciardella A, Brown D. Wide field imaging. In: Agarwal A, ed. Fundus Fluorescein and Indocyanine Green Angiography: A Textbook and Atlas. New York, NY: Slack Inc; 2007:79-83.
  12. Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science. 1991;254:1178-1181.
  13. Gabriele ML, Wollstein G, Ishikawa H, et al. Optical coherence tomography: history, current status, and laboratory work. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;14:2425-2436.

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Be confident that your patient care is up to date

Medicine Matters is being incorporated into Springer Medicine, our new medical education platform. 

Alongside the news coverage and expert commentary you have come to expect from Medicine Matters diabetes, Springer Medicine's complimentary membership also provides access to articles from renowned journals and a broad range of Continuing Medical Education programs. Create your free account »