Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Short Communication
  • Published:

Mobile applications for obesity and weight management: current market characteristics

Abstract

Mobile-Health (mHealth) is the fastest-developing eHealth sector, with over 100 000 health applications (apps) currently available. Overweight/obesity is a problem of wide public concern that is potentially treatable/preventable through mHealth. This study describes the current weight-management app-market. Five app stores (Apple, Google, Amazon, Windows and Blackberry) in UK, US, Russia, Japan and Germany, Italy, France, China, Australia and Canada were searched for keywords: ‘weight’, ‘calorie’, ‘weight-loss’, ‘slimming’, ‘diet’, ‘dietitian’ and ‘overweight’ in January/February 2016 using App-Annie software. The 10 most downloaded apps in the lifetime of an app were recorded. Developers’ lists and the app descriptions were searched to identify any professional input with keywords ‘professional’, ‘dietitian’ and ‘nutritionist’. A total of 28 905 relevant apps were identified as follows: Apple iTunes=8559 (4634, 54% paid), Google Play=1762 (597, 33.9% paid), Amazon App=13569 (4821, 35.5% paid), Windows=2419 (819, 17% paid) and Blackberry=2596 (940, 36% paid). The 28 905 identified apps focused mainly on physical activity (34%), diet (31%), and recording/monitoring of exercise, calorie intake and body weight (23%). Only 17 apps (0.05%) were developed with identifiable professional input. Apps on weight management are widely available and very popular but currently lack professional content expertise. Encouraging app development based on evidence-based online approaches would assure content quality, allowing healthcare professionals to recommend their use.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yoo JH . The meaning of information technology (IT) mobile devices to me, the infectious disease physician. Infect Chemother 2013; 45: 244–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Murfin M . Know your apps: an evidence-based approach to the evaluation of mobile clinical applications. J Physician Assist Educ 2013; 24: 38–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boulos MN, Wheeler S, Tavares C, Jones R . How smartphones are changing the face of mobile and participatory health care; an overview, with example from eCAALYX. Biomed Eng Online 2011; 10: 24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. GSMA 2015. The Mobile Economy. Available at http://www.gsmamobileeconomy.com/GSMA_Global_Mobile_Economy_Report_2015.pdf (accessed on 15 October 2015).

  5. Wallace S, Clark M, White J . ‘It’s on my iPhone’: attitudes to the use of mobile computing devices in medical education, a mixed-methods study. BMJ Open 2012; 2: e001099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. European Commision. Healthcare in your pocket: unlocking the potential of mHealth. 2014. Available at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-14-394_en.htm (accessed on 23 December 2015).

  7. Payne KB, Wharrad H, Watts K . Smartphone and medical related app use among medical students and junior doctors in the United Kingdom (UK): a regional survey. BMC Med Inform Dec Mak 2012; 12: 121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, Thomson B, Graetz N, Margon C et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2014; 384: 766–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vlassopoulos A, Combet E, Lean ME . Changing distributions of body size and adiposity with age. Int J Obesity. 2014; 38: 857–864.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Health and Social Care Information Centre. Statistics on obesity, physical activity and diet. 2015. Available at http://www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB16988/obes-phys-acti-diet-eng-2015.pdf (accessed on 25 May 2016).

  11. Tang J, Abraham C, Greaves C, Yates T . Self-directed interventions to promote weight loss: a systematic review of reviews. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16: e58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Global Web Index. Device Ownership. 2016. http://insight.globalwebindex.net/device accessed on 11 September 2016.

  13. IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics. Patient adoption of mHealth: use, evidence and remaining barriers to mainstream acceptance. 2015. Available at http://www.imshealth.com/files/web/IMSH%20Institute/Reports/Patient%20Adoption%20of%20mHealth/IIHI_Patient_Adoption_of_mHealth.pdf (accessed on 16 September 2016).

  14. Farago P . App engagement: the matrix reloaded. 2012. Available at http://flurrymobile.tumblr.com/post/113379517625/app-engagement-the-matrix-reloaded (accessed on 16 September 2016).

  15. Direito A, Jiang Y, Whittaker R, Maddison R . Apps for IMproving FITness and increasing physical activity among young people: the AIMFIT pragmatic randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17: e210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Azar KM, Lesser LI, Laing BY, Stephens J, Aurora MS, Burke LE, Palaniappan LP . Mobile applications for weight management: theory-based content analysis. Am J Prev Med 2013; 45: 583–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pagoto S, Schneider K, Jojic M, DeBiasse M, Mann D . Evidence-based strategies in weight-loss mobile apps. Am J Prev Med 2013; 45: 576–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen J, Cade JE, Allman-Farinelli M . The most popular smartphone apps for weight loss: a quality assessment. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2015; 3: e104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Direito A, Dale LP, Shields E, Dobson R, Whittaker R, Maddison R . Do physical activity and dietary smartphone applications incorporate evidence-based behaviour change techniques? BMC Public Health 2014; 14: 646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Food and Drug Administration organization (FDA). Mobile medical applications. guidance for industry and Food and Drug Administration staff. 2015. Available at. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/.../UCM263366.pdf (accessed on 21 December 2015).

  21. European Commission. Commission staff working document on the existing legal EU framework applicable to lifestyle and wellbeing apps 2014. Available at file:///C://Downloads/CommissionStaffWorkingDocumentontheexistingEUlegalframeworkapplicabletolifestyleandwellbeingapps.pdf (accessd on 21 December 2015).

  22. iPrescribeApps-From clinical problem to mobile solution. Available at https://iprescribeapps.com/ (accessed on 25 May 2016).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C K Nikolaou.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on International Journal of Obesity website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nikolaou, C., Lean, M. Mobile applications for obesity and weight management: current market characteristics. Int J Obes 41, 200–202 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2016.186

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2016.186

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links