Elsevier

Transplantation Reviews

Volume 27, Issue 4, October 2013, Pages 112-116
Transplantation Reviews

Kidney transplant options for the diabetic patient

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trre.2013.07.002Get rights and content

Abstract

For patients with diabetes and progressive chronic kidney disease, kidney transplantation is the optimal mode of renal replacement therapy, with or without a pancreas transplant. Additional benefits of pancreas transplant have become increasingly apparent due to advances in surgical outcomes and immunosuppression, and may be reasonably considered even in selected patients with type 2 diabetes. In general, pancreas transplantation is associated with long-term survival advantages despite an increased short-term morbidity and mortality risk. This is true with simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation or pancreas after kidney transplantation compared to kidney transplantation alone, regardless of kidney donor status (living or deceased). Individual patient preferences, comorbidities, and expected waiting time influence selection of transplant modality, rather than a clear survival benefit of one strategy versus the other. In selected patients with type 2 diabetes, recent outcomes data support cautious utilization of simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation when a living kidney donor transplant is not an option. The purpose of this review is to summarize current data regarding kidney and pancreas transplant treatment options in patients with both type 1 and 2 diabetes and the influence of current organ allocation policies to better understand the advantages and disadvantages of each of these strategies.

Introduction

While kidney transplantation has been consistently associated with improved survival when compared to dialysis from the 1990s to the present, pancreas transplantation has become increasingly successful in recent years due to advances in surgical outcomes and immunosuppression [1], [2], [3] With kidney transplant survival in diabetics approaching 88% for deceased donors and 96% for living donors at 1 year, one-year pancreas graft survival is now nearly 85% when performed as a simultaneous pancreas kidney transplant, (SPK), and 77% when performed as a pancreas after kidney transplant, (PAK) [4], [5]. Questions of the relative advantages of SPK transplant over living donor kidney transplant alone (LDKA) with or without subsequent pancreas transplant (pancreas after kidney, PAK) have been addressed in large database analyses, but specific patient and transplant center attributes may have an impact on the specific modality recommendations given to an individual patient. This review will summarize these reports and provide commentary when applying these data to the care of the individual.

Section snippets

The benefit of the added pancreas transplant in kidney transplant recipients

For the patient with T1DM and chronic kidney disease, initial transplant options include kidney transplant alone (from a deceased or living donor, DDKA, LDKA) or simultaneous pancreas kidney transplant (SPK). Under most circumstances, the benefit of LDKA versus DDKA is well understood in terms of graft survival as well as patient survival [5], [6]. The potential for pancreas transplant to provide benefits beyond kidney transplant alone can be assessed not only by patient and graft survival data

Timing of pancreas transplantation: Pancreas simultaneously with kidney, or after kidney transplant?

While the benefits and risks of SPK transplant can provide a framework for understanding the potential benefit of pancreas transplantation in general, a common clinical scenario is one in which external factors such as waiting time for an SPK preclude this option, and encourage LDKA with a later consideration for pancreas after kidney transplant (PAK). When examining registry data, long-term pancreas graft function is inferior when performed as a PAK than as an SPK. For patients transplanted in

Individual comorbidities and circumstances that impact transplant modality choice

It must be acknowledged that the above data is derived either from retrospective database analyses or large single center reports, with the data under these conditions subject to differing levels of bias. The findings are consistent in the association of superior survival with the added pancreas provided that pancreatic function is achieved even for a short period. However, since the differences appear relatively late in the course of a transplant it is very appropriate to consider all options

Pancreas transplantation for type 2 diabetes?

Until recently, there was no clear distinction for the type of diabetes that was considered appropriate for pancreas transplantation, primarily due to the difficulties in appropriately classifying patients based upon simple and often inaccurate indicators such as insulin utilization, c-peptide levels, and age of onset of disease. A small subset of patients reported as type 2 diabetes have received SPK transplants over the last decade [52]; patients with type 2 diabetes now comprise 8% of

Summary

Given the narrow but consistent advantages of an added pancreas transplant either as an SPK or PAK over kidney transplant alone, the decision-making for a specific individual regarding transplant options will most likely focus upon the individual’s morbidity and perceived quality of life associated with ongoing diabetes care, the waiting time in which a patient must wait for an SPK rather than undergo a kidney transplant (typically via a living donor), and the characteristics and allocation

References (54)

  • J.D. Schold et al.

    Marked variation of the association of ESRD duration before and after wait listing on kidney transplant outcomes

    Am J Transplant

    (2010)
  • R.A. Wolfe et al.

    Calculating life years from transplant (LYFT): methods for kidney and kidney-pancreas candidates

    Am J Transplant

    (2008)
  • E.B. Finger et al.

    Comparison of recipient outcomes following transplant from local versus imported pancreas donors

    Am J Transplant

    (2012)
  • D.A. Axelrod et al.

    Systematic evaluation of pancreas allograft quality, outcomes and geographic variation in utilization

    Am J Transplant

    (2010)
  • B.L. Kasiske et al.

    Optimizing the program-specific reporting of pancreas transplant outcomes

    Am J Transplant

    (2013)
  • J.A. Fridell et al.

    Preparation of the pancreas allograft for transplantation

    Clin Transplant

    (2011)
  • R.A. Wolfe et al.

    Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant

    N Engl J Med

    (1999)
  • R.L. Heilman et al.

    Immunosuppression in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: progress to date

    Drugs

    (2010)
  • A.C. Gruessner et al.

    Pancreas transplantation in the United States: a review

    Curr Opin Organ Transplant

    (2010)
  • P.R. Salvalaggio et al.

    Incremental value of the pancreas allograft to the survival of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant recipients

    Diabetes Care

    (2009)
  • A.S. Weiss et al.

    Standard criteria donor pancreas donation status is associated with improved kidney transplant outcomes

    Clin Transplant

    (2009)
  • A.S. Weiss et al.

    Simultaneous pancreas-kidney versus deceased donor kidney transplant: can a fair comparison be made?

    Transplantation

    (2009)
  • M. Kamgar et al.

    Zero-mismatch deceased-donor kidney versus simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

    Transplantation

    (2012)
  • B.Y. Young et al.

    Living donor kidney versus simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant in type I diabetics: an analysis of the OPTN/UNOS database

    Clin J Am Soc Nephrol

    (2009)
  • C. Morath et al.

    Metabolic control improves long-term renal allograft and patient survival in type 1 diabetes

    J Am Soc Nephrol: JASN

    (2008)
  • A.S. Weiss et al.

    Twelve-month pancreas graft function significantly influences survival following simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

    Clin J Am Soc Nephrol

    (2009)
  • S.P. Norman et al.

    Early pancreas graft failure is associated with inferior late clinical outcomes after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation

    Transplantation

    (2011)
  • Cited by (8)

    • Pancreas transplantation in C-peptide positive patients: Does "type" of diabetes really matter?

      2015, Journal of the American College of Surgeons
      Citation Excerpt :

      Standard selection criteria for SPKT in T2DM based on the experiences to date include patients less than 55 to 60 years of age with a BMI < 30 kg/m2, insulin-requiring for a minimum of 3 to 5 years with a total daily insulin requirement <1 U/kg/day or <100 U/day, a fasting C-peptide level < 10 ng/mL, absence of severe vascular disease or tobacco abuse, adequate cardiopulmonary function (low coronary risk and comorbidity profile), and presence of “complicated” diabetes. Because SPKT is associated with a shorter waiting time, enhanced donor quality, increased life expectancy, higher graft survival, improved quality of life, and better preservation of renal function number compared with deceased donor kidney transplantation alone,4,5,8,47,48,52 characterization of the type of diabetes may be irrelevant, and insulin-requiring patients with DM should be evaluated for SPKT based on their predicted ability to tolerate the surgical procedure (with a higher inherent complication rate) and requisite immunosuppression, as well as comply with a more stringent post-transplantation follow-up regimen irrespective of pre-existing C-peptide production. The belief that T2DM should be considered an absolute contraindication to PTx is not substantiated by available data.

    • Kidney Transplantation and Kidney Pancreas Transplantation

      2022, Diabetes and Kidney Disease, Second Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text