Health care professionals’ understanding and day-to-day practice of patient empowerment in diabetes; time to pause for thought?☆
Introduction
Since its original definition as “A process whereby patients have the knowledge, skills, attitudes and self-awareness necessary to influence their own behaviour and that of others in order to improve the quality of their lives” [1] empowerment became a popular topic with policy makers and researchers alike [e.g. 2] in the early 1990s.
Central to the original definition of empowerment is a new role for healthcare professionals (HCPs). This role, sees HCPs as active partners and collaborators with patients, and in shaping patients’ self-management care plans. Such an arrangement, often clashes with an ‘acute-care’ model, [3] where, traditionally, HCPs are seen as experts, called upon to autonomously treat an illness per se.
It is known that HCPs, can find implementing empowerment group education, difficult in practice. In a study with European diabetes HCPs, Adolfsson et al. [4] showed that although diabetes HCPs “knew their role in the traditional approach”, they had problems with empowerment. “As experts they felt secure; as facilitators they needed support” [4]. In similar work by Jones et al. [5], London General Practitioners (GPs) were found to be using shared decision making, a defining feature of empowerment, as a tool to get patients to agree with the HCP's perspective, rather than in its true function of, truly, shared decision making.
We have previously argued [6], [7], [8], [9] that the concept of empowerment is problematic in the inherent assumptions it carries. Thus, empowerment as a concept assumes that HCPs are themselves able, and willing and consciously in favour of, adopting a model that relies on principles such as patient-centred care and shared decision making. We have also shown [10], that diabetes HCPs’ use of empowerment in practice is quite varied; whilst some see empowerment as a rejection of paternalism and an attempt to bring balance and social justice in the HPC–patient relationship, others use the process as a tool to administer (scarce) health-care system resources more efficiently. These findings point to the fact that HCPs practise empowerment in different ways because, perhaps, they have varied and different understandings of what the concept actually means. Given the various definitions of the concept of empowerment, the discussion that has since emerged [6], [7], [8], [9], [11], and the lucidity in thinking and clarity in evidence that has recently been called for in relation to equivocally defining what empowerment is and is not [9], it would not be surprising if we found that HCPs attempting to practise empowerment in a clinic also have a range of views regarding the concept.
It would be interesting to know what HCPs actually understand empowerment to be and how they perceive that they apply empowerment in clinical practice.
This paper presents data from a Diabetes UK-funded study, which explored HCPs’ knowledge and understanding of empowerment in diabetes, the barriers and opportunities professionals faced when practicing it, as well their self-reported support needs. Here, we address two of the larger study's research aims. Specifically, we present data on the following research questions:
- (1)
What do HCPs working in diabetes understand by the term ‘empowerment’? and
- (2)
Do HCPs working in diabetes apply the principles of empowerment in day-to-day consultations and if so, in what ways?
Section snippets
Methods
The study took place in a moderately deprived area in South-East England with a population known for featuring a highly diverse demographic profile and poorer health outcomes and lower life expectancy than the UK average.
Front line HCPs working with diabetes patients in their daily practice were recruited from hospital diabetes clinics, walk-in health centres and local GP practices. Recruitment was by the researchers introducing the study at diabetes HCP staff meetings, following which,
Results
Data are presented thematically within each area and all responses and quotes are anonymised to protect participants’ identity. Representative quotes are used to illustrate themes. Convergent and divergent experiences and views are highlighted.
Discussion
This was a small exploratory study seeking to understand whether HCPs working with a socially deprived mix of patients in the South East of England, understand the concept of empowerment and how they practise empowerment in day-to-day practice.
The data showed that although there is no clear specific understanding of what empowerment is and what it involves, there is broad acceptance of a range of factors around education and informed choices. Thus, empowerment incorporates providing patients
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References (21)
- et al.
Implementing empowerment group education in diabetes
Pat Educ Couns
(2004) - et al.
Is patient involvement possible when decisions involve scarce resources?. A qualitative study of decision-making in primary care
Soc Sci Med
(2004) - et al.
Empowerment: an idea whose time has come in diabetes education
Diabetes Educ
(1991) Diabetes in the NHS
Commissioning and Providing Specialist Services
(2007)- et al.
Empowerment: giving power to people with diabetes
J Diabet Nurs
(2005) Empowerment in the management of diabetes: are we ready to test assumptions?
Europ Diab Nurs
(2007)- et al.
A response to professor Anderson's commentary on empowerment article by Asimakopoulou, K
Europ Diab Nurs
(2008) - et al.
‘First do no harm’: the potential shortfalls and stumbling blocks of empowerment in diabetes
Europ Diab Nurs
(2010) - Asimakopoulou K, Gilbert D, Newton P, Scambler S. Back to basics? Re-examining the role of patient empowerment in...
- Newton P, Scambler S, Asimakopoulou K. Marrying contradictions; Health care professionals’ perceptions of empowerment...
Cited by (24)
Asking 'What about' questions in chronic illness self-management meetings
2016, Patient Education and CounselingCitation Excerpt :Within healthcare, communication between patients and practitioners conveys expectations about each side’s level of knowledge and control on the illness and its management. Practitioners, for example, may enact at different times the role of expert or of facilitator in knowledge-building, whereas the patients can change between being active participants in their illness management or seeking more direct guidance [14]. Research in healthcare and other settings shows that professionals who work under institutional constraints on not giving advice or direct responses tend to rely on sets of conversational routines—for example, embedding a recommendation in a question to the client [15]– to maintain the flow of conversation while complying with the constraints [16–18].
Patient Empowerment and its neighbours: Clarifying the boundaries and their mutual relationships
2015, Health PolicyCitation Excerpt :As a result, a variety of initiatives that aim at “empowering” patients in self-management [11] and shared decision-making [54] have been implemented in the most developed Countries. Despite the wealth of studies, however, there is lack of consensus on the initiatives, inputs and conditions that patients and providers can adopt to obtain patient empowerment [5,14,35]. Two problems explain this struggle.
Barriers and opportunities of empowerment as applied in diabetes settings: A focus on health care professionals' experiences
2012, Diabetes Research and Clinical PracticeCitation Excerpt :In particular, and quite worryingly, we showed that some HCPs use empowerment as a means of getting patients to achieve glycaemic control and meet biochemical targets, imposed on the HCPs by a health system that is perhaps, not as empowering with its HCPs as it aspires to be with patients. In the same study reported in this journal [13], we further asked HCPs to report on what they see as the main opportunities and barriers of the concept of empowerment in practice. Additionally, we wished to enquire about their self-reported, perceived training needs in helping them practice empowerment in their day-to-day clinical work.
Empowering patients to self-control and self-management of anticoagulant therapy
2023, Pielegniarstwo XXI WiekuLinear Educational Model for Empowerment of Patients
2022, Didactica Slovenica - Pedagoska Obzorja
- ☆
The study was supported by a small grant from Diabetes UK.