The Self-Perception Profile for Children: further evidence for its factor structure, reliability, and validity

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00004-7Get rights and content

Abstract

This article presents further evidence for the psychometric qualities of the Self-Perception Profile for Children (SPPC), a widely used questionnaire for assessing self-esteem in youths. The SPPC was administered to a large sample of Dutch school children (N=1143) in order to study its factor structure, reliability (internal consistency and test–retest stability), and validity. Results showed that the hypothesized factor structure of the SPPC representing five specific domains of self-esteem (i.e. scholastic competence, social acceptance, athletic competence, physical appearance, and behavioral conduct) provided a reasonable fit for the data. Furthermore, the reliability of the scale appeared to be satisfactory with good internal consistency and test–retest stability. Finally, evidence was also obtained for the validity of the SPPC. More specifically, the scale correlated in a theoretically meaningful way with child-, parent-, and teacher-reports of psychopathology and personality. Altogether, the current findings confirm the notion that the SPPC is a reliable and valid self-report measure for assessing children's self-esteem.

Introduction

Self-esteem refers to an individual's feelings of his or her worthiness and competence. Harter (1999) views self-esteem as an evaluative aspect of the self-system which is related to the image of an ideal self that we all have: when there is little discrepancy between the ideal and the perceived real self, the individual will experience high self-esteem. However, when the discrepancy is great, low self-esteem is the result. Self-esteem can be considered as an individual difference variable of which the foundation is layed in middle childhood when children develop the ability to compare themselves with peers (Ruble, Boggiano, Feldman, & Loebl, 1980). As a result of this comparison, children increasingly realize how they stand relative to their peers in various domains of functioning (school, sports, social relationships), and accordingly adjust their level of self-esteem.

Self-esteem is generally regarded as an important index of children's well-being and mental health. High self-esteem has been linked to satisfaction and happiness in later life, while low self-esteem is associated with depression, anxiety, and maladjustment both in school and social relationships (see for a review Harter, 1993). For this reason, reliable and valid measures of self-esteem are considered as useful for research, clinical, and educational practices.

The most widely used questionnaire for assessing self-esteem in youths is the Self-Perception Profile for Children (SPPC; Harter, 1985). The SPPC evaluates self-esteem in five domains: scholastic competence, social acceptance, athletic competence, physical appearance, and behavioral conduct, as well as global self-worth. The psychometric properties of the SPPC have been examined in various studies, the results of which can be summarized as follows. To begin with, factor analysis of the SPPC has generally indicated that the questionnaire consists of five factors that correspond with the hypothesized domains of self-esteem (Boivin et al., 1992, Granleese and Joseph, 1993, Granleese and Joseph, 1994, Miller, 2000, Schumann et al., 1999, Van den Bergh and Marcoen, 1999, Van den Bergh and Van Ranst, 1998, Veerman et al., 1996). Furthermore, the internal consistency and test–retest stability of the SPPC scales can be defined as satisfactory (e.g. Granleese and Joseph, 1994, Van Dongen-Melman et al., 1993). Finally, evidence has been obtained for the validity of the SPPC. More specifically, SPPC scores correlate positively with peer-, teacher-, and parent-ratings of children's competence (e.g. Cole et al., 2001, Van den Bergh and Marcoen, 1999) and negatively with levels of psychopathological symptoms (e.g. Alatorre Alva and De los Reyes, 1999, Cole et al., 1999, Compas et al., 1991, Evans et al., 1994). Moreover, lowered levels of SPPC-assessed self-esteem have been found in clinically referred children and adolescents suffering from disruptive and emotional disorders (e.g. Dumas and Pelletier, 1999, Renouf et al., 1997).

While the earlier mentioned studies all provide support for the psychometric qualities of the SPPC, a comprehensive research article on the reliability and validity of this questionnaire is still missing in the literature. The current study was an attempt to fill up this gap. The SPPC was administered to a large sample of Dutch school children (N=1143) in order to study the following issues. (1) The factor structure of the questionnaire was re-examined using confirmatory factor analysis. (2) The reliability (internal consistency and test–retest stability) of the scale was further investigated. (3) The validity of the SPPC was established through its associations with measures of psychopathology and personality. With respect to the latter issue, it is important to note that data were used from different informants viz children themselves, parents, and teachers.

Section snippets

Participants

Participants were 1143 children (532 boys and 611 girls) recruited from six primary and one secondary school in the southern part of The Netherlands. Mean age of the children was 11.2 years (S.D.=1.0, range 8–14 years). Children were primarily Caucasian (>90%). Due to school constraints, further information about the socioeconomic status and family structure of the children was not available.

Questionnaires

As mentioned in the introduction, the SPPC is a self-report questionnaire assessing children's

Factor structure

Confirmatory factor analysis showed that a correlated five-factor structure for the SPPC provided a reasonable fit for the data. Goodness-of-fit indices were: χ2/df=3.6 [χ2(395)=1436.1, P<0.001], RMSEA=0.04, CFI=0.83, NNFI=0.82, and GFI=0.96. As can be seen in Table 2, all 36 items clearly loaded on their intended factor.

The five-factor higher-order model did not provide a better fit. Goodness-of-fit indices were even less satisfactory: χ2/df=4.0 [χ2(400)=1591.8, P<0.001], RMSEA=0.05, CFI=0.81,

Discussion

While previous studies have found support for various aspects of reliability and validity of the SPPC, the present study provides a more comprehensive evaluation of the psychometric properties of this scale in a large sample of normal children aged 8–14 years. The main results can be summarized as follows. To begin with, confirmatory factor analysis showed that a five-factor model in which SPPC items cluster into five separate but correlated domains of self-esteem, viz. scholastic competence,

References (39)

  • D. Cole et al.

    Social origins of depressive cognitionsa longitudinal study of self-perceived competence in children

    Cognitive Therapy and Research

    (2001)
  • D. Cole et al.

    Children's over- and underestimation of academic competenceA longitudinal study of gender differences, depression, and anxiety

    Child Development

    (1999)
  • B. Compas et al.

    Correlates of internalizing and externalizing behavior problemsperceived competence, causal attributions, and parental symptoms

    Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

    (1991)
  • J. Derksen et al.

    Junior versie van de Bar-On Emotional Quotient Vragenlijst (Nederlandse vertaling en bewerking)

    (1998)
  • C. De Wit

    Depressie vragenlijst voor kinderen (Depression questionnaire for children), DVK en KDVK

    (1987)
  • D. Dumas et al.

    A study of self-perception in hyperactive children

    American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing

    (1999)
  • D. Evans et al.

    Self-perception and adolescent psychopathologya clinical-developmental perspective

    American Journal of Orthopsychiatry

    (1994)
  • H. Eysenck et al.

    Primary trait measurement of the 21 components of the P-E-N system

    European Journal of Psychological Assessment

    (1992)
  • J. Garber et al.

    Predictors of depressive cognitions in young adolescents

    Cognitive Therapy and Research

    (2001)
  • Cited by (202)

    • Do personal values have an effect on self-esteem in middle childhood?

      2022, Personality and Individual Differences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Support for the structure of associations between the 10 basic values has been found in hundreds of studies in over 80 countries (Sagiv et al., 2017). Self-esteem describes the robust functioning of an individual (Harter, 1990) and reflects an individual's feelings and beliefs about their own competence and worthiness (e.g., Jacobs et al., 2002; Muris et al., 2003). Self-esteem reflects evaluative aspects of the self, with global self-esteem seen as the over-arching view of the self and a predictor of both positive and negative outcomes later in life (see Butler & Gasson, 2005; Emler, 2001).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text