Clinical experience with the oxytocin challenge test
References (10)
- et al.
Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol
(1960) - et al.
Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol
(1970) - et al.
- et al.
Clin. Obstet. Gynecol
(1968) Clin. Obstet. Gynecol
(1968)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (172)
Improving the interpretation of electronic fetal monitoring: the fetal reserve index
2023, American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyN° 197a-Surveillance du bien-être fœtal : Directive consensus d'antepartum
2018, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology CanadaNo. 197a-Fetal Health Surveillance: Antepartum Consensus Guideline
2018, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology CanadaPlace of fetal heart rate monitoring and its computerized analysis during the surveillance of prolonged pregnancy
2011, Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la ReproductionFetal Assessment During Pregnancy
2009, Pediatric Clinics of North AmericaCitation Excerpt :Historically, the CST was the mainstay of fetal surveillance before the advent of other noninvasive tests. Developed in 1972 by Ray and colleagues,33 the CST was originally termed the “oxytocin challenge test.” During uterine contractions, placental blood flow is decreased.
Antenatal Testing: Diabetes Mellitus
2008, Seminars in PerinatologyCitation Excerpt :Based on the evaluation of the fetal heart rate response to uterine contractions, the CST has the potential to test for a chronic condition and serve as a surrogate for placental function. Ray and Freeman reported on the use of the CST in a cohort of diabetic women.5 Thirty-eight women had a weekly CST performed with the results blinded.
Copyright © 1972 Published by Mosby, Inc.