Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Screening for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Aim

Individuals with type 2 diabetes are at heightened risk for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, which gives rise to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and cirrhosis. Yet, current guidelines do not recommend screening for NASH among these high-risk patients. Using a simulation model, we assessed the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening diabetic patients for NASH.

Methods

A Markov model was constructed to compare two management strategies for 50-year-olds with diabetes. In the No Screening strategy, patients do not undergo screening, although NASH may be diagnosed incidentally over their lifetime. In the NASH Screening strategy, all patients receive a one-time screening ultrasound. Individuals with fatty infiltration on ultrasound then have a liver biopsy, and those found to have NASH receive medical therapy, which decreases progression to cirrhosis. Endpoints evaluated included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).

Results

Screening for NASH decreased the number of individuals who developed cirrhosis by 12.9 % and resulted in an 11.9 % decrease in liver-related deaths. However, screening resulted in 0.02 fewer QALYs, due to the disutility associated with treatment, and was therefore dominated by the No Screening strategy. When the model excluded this quality-of-life decrement, screening became cost-effective, at an ICER of $42,134 per QALY.

Conclusions

Screening for NASH may improve liver-related outcomes, but is not cost-effective at present, due to side effects of therapy. As better tolerated treatments for NASH become available, even with modest efficacy, screening for NASH will become cost-effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Browning JD, Szczepaniak LS, Dobbins R, et al. Prevalence of hepatic steatosis in an urban population in the United States: impact of ethnicity. Hepatology. 2004;40:1387–1395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Charlton MR, Burns JM, Pedersen RA, Watt KD, Heimbach JK, Dierkhising RA. Frequency and outcomes of liver transplantation for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2011;141:1249–1253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Leite NC, Salles GF, Araujo AL, Villela-Nogueira CA, Cardoso CR. Prevalence and associated factors of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus. Liver Int. 2009;29:113–119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Prashanth M, Ganesh HK, Vima MV, et al. Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Assoc Physicians India. 2009;57:205–210.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Abdelmalek MF, Diehl AM. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease as a complication of insulin resistance. Med Clin North Am. 2007;91:1125–1149.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Leite NC, Villela-Nogueira CA, Pannain VL, et al. Histopathological stages of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in type 2 diabetes: prevalences and correlated factors. Liver Int. 2011;31:700–706.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gupte P, Amarapurkar D, Agal S, et al. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;19:854–858.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Doycheva I, Patel N, Peterson M, Loomba R. Prognostic implication of liver histology in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in diabetes. J Diabetes Complicat. 2013;27:293–300.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Davila JA, Morgan RO, Shaib Y, McGlynn KA, El-Serag HB. Diabetes increases the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States: a population based case control study. Gut. 2005;54:533–539.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. El-Serag HB, Tran T, Everhart JE. Diabetes increases the risk of chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:460–468.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, et al. The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: practice Guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Gastroenterological Association. Hepatology. 2012;55:2005–2023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bravo AA, Sheth SG, Chopra S. Liver biopsy. N Engl J Med. 2001;15(344):495–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Musso G, Gambino R, Cassader M, Pagano G. Meta-analysis: natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for liver disease severity. Ann Med. 2011;43:617–649.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Belfort R, Harrison SA, Brown K, et al. A placebo-controlled trial of pioglitazone in subjects with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. N Engl J Med. 2006;30:2297–2307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mahady SE, Webster AC, Walker S, Sanyal A, George J. The role of thiazolidinediones in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis—a systematic review and meta analysis. J Hepatol. 2011;55:1383–1390.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Musso G, Gambino R, Cassader M, Pagano G. A meta-analysis of randomized trials for the treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2010;52:79–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Miller ER 3rd, Pastor-Barriuso R, Dalal D, Riemersma RA, Appel LJ, Guallar E. Meta-analysis: high-dosage vitamin E supplementation may increase all-cause mortality. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:37–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Targher G, Bertolini L, Padovani R, et al. Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and its association with cardiovascular disease among type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:1212–1218.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Angulo P, Keach JC, Batts KP, Lindor KD. Independent predictors of liver fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 1999;30:1356–1362.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Matteoni CA, Younossi ZM, Gramlich T, Boparai N, Liu YC, McCullough AJ. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a spectrum of clinical and pathological severity. Gastroenterology. 1999;116:1413–1419.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Younossi ZM, Gramlich T, Matteoni CA, Boparai N, McCullough AJ. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2:262–265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Harrison SA, Torgerson S, Hayashi PH. The natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a clinical histopathological study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:2042–2047.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sanyal AJ, Banas C, Sargeant C, et al. Similarities and differences in outcomes of cirrhosis due to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2006;43:682–689.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ratziu V, Bonyhay L, Di Martino V, et al. Survival, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma in obesity-related cryptogenic cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2002;35:1485–1493.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. CPI Inflation Calculator. 2015; Available at: http://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm. Accessed March 13, 2015.

  26. Mahady SE, Wong G, Craig JC, George J. Pioglitazone and vitamin E for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a cost utility analysis. Hepatology. 2012;56:2172–2179.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dormandy J, Bhattacharya M, van Troostenburg de Bruyn AR. PROactive investigators. Safety and tolerability of pioglitazone in high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes: an overview of data from PROactive. Drug Saf. 2009;32:187–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Grey A. Skeletal consequences of thiazolidinedione therapy. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19:129–137.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Siegel JE, Weinstein MC, Russell LB, Gold MR. Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA. 1996;23–30:1339–1341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Winkelmayer WC, Weinstein MC, Mittleman MA, Glynn RJ, Pliskin JS. Health economic evaluations: the special case of end-stage renal disease treatment. Med Decis Making. 2002;22:417–430.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rinella ME, Loomba R, Caldwell SH, et al. Controversies in the diagnosis and management of NAFLD and NASH. Gastroenterol Hepatol (NY). 2014;10:219–227.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Valentine WJ, Tucker D, Palmer AJ, et al. Long-term cost-effectiveness of pioglitazone versus placebo in addition to existing diabetes treatment: a US analysis based on PROactive. Value Health. 2009;12:1–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Desai NR, Shrank WH, Fischer MA, et al. Patterns of medication initiation in newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus: quality and cost implications. Am J Med. 2012;125:302.e1–302.e7.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hampp C, Borders-Hemphill V, Moeny DG, Wysowski DK. Use of antidiabetic drugs in the U.S., 2003–2012. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:1367–1374.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rafiq N, Bai C, Fang Y, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:234–238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tolman KG, Fonseca V, Dalpiaz A, Tan MH. Spectrum of liver disease in type 2 diabetes and management of patients with diabetes and liver disease. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:734–743.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Loomba R, Sanyal AJ, et al. Farnesoid X nuclear receptor ligand obeticholic acid for non-cirrhotic, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (FLINT): a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385:956–965.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lindor KD, Bru C, Jorgensen RA, et al. The role of ultrasonography and automatic-needle biopsy in outpatient percutaneous liver biopsy. Hepatology. 1996;23:1079–1083.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hansen RA, Farley JF, Droege M, Maciejewski ML. A retrospective cohort study of economic outcomes and adherence to monotherapy with metformin, pioglitazone, or a sulfonylurea among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the United States from 2003 to 2005. Clin Ther. 2010;32:1308–1319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Eckman MH, Kaiser TE, Sherman KE. The cost-effectiveness of screening for chronic hepatitis B infection in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:1294–1306.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Physician fee schedule look-up. 2015. http://www.cms.gov/apps/physician-fee-schedule/. Accessed January 7, 2015.

  42. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Addendum B.-Final OPPS Payment by HCPCS Code for CY 2013. goo.gl/M2cX3F. Accessed October 23, 2014.

  43. Red Book Online. 2015. www.micromedexsolutions.com. Accessed January 7, 2015.

  44. Pasha T, Gabriel S, Therneau T, Dickson ER, Lindor KD. Cost-effectiveness of ultrasound-guided liver biopsy. Hepatology. 1998;27:1220–1226.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Wilschut J, Knudsen AB, Ballegooijen M, Kuntz KM. Cost-Effectiveness of DNA Stool Testing to Screen for Colorectal Cancer. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  46. McLernon DJ, Dillon J, Donnan PT. Health-state utilities in liver disease: a systematic review. Med Decis Making. 2008;28:582–592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Beaudet A, Clegg J, Thuresson PO, Lloyd A, McEwan P. Review of utility values for economic modeling in type 2 diabetes. Value Health. 2014;17:462–470.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sanyal AJ, Chalasani N, Kowdley KV, et al. Pioglitazone, vitamin E, or placebo for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. N Engl J Med. 2010;6:1675–1685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Kathleen E. Corey and Raymond T. Chung received grant support from NIH K23 DK099422 and K24 DK078772, respectively.

Author contribution

Kathleen E. Corey, Matthew J. Klebanoff and Chin Hur were involved in study concept and design, and acquisition of data; Kathleen E. Corey, Matthew J. Klebanoff, Raymond T. Chung, Chin Hur were involved in analysis and interpretation of data; Kathleen E. Corey, Matthew J. Klebanoff, Chin Hur drafted the manuscript; Kathleen E. Corey, Matthew J. Klebanoff, Raymond T. Chung, Chin Hur were involved in critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; Kathleen E. Corey, Matthew J. Klebanoff, Angela C. Tramontano were involved in administration; Kathleen E. Corey, Matthew J. Klebanoff, Angela C. Tramontano provided technical or material support; and Kathleen E. Corey, Chin Hur were involved in study supervision.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathleen E. Corey.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Chung received funding from Gilead Sciences (not for NAFLD research). The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Corey, K.E., Klebanoff, M.J., Tramontano, A.C. et al. Screening for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Dig Dis Sci 61, 2108–2117 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-016-4044-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-016-4044-2

Keywords

Navigation