Skip to main content

10-13-2017 | Insulin | Article

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Impact of Proper Insulin Injection Technique Training on Glycemic Control

Journal: Diabetes Therapy

Authors: Inna V. Misnikova, Valeria A. Gubkina, Tatyana S. Lakeeva, Alexander V. Dreval

Publisher: Springer Healthcare




Improper injection technique can negatively affect glycemic control and treatment tolerability. We assessed the impact of structured insulin injection training on glycemic control.


We compared changes in glycated hemoglobin (A1C) and fasting plasma glucose following structured insulin injection training in a 6-month pilot study in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes. Patients were recruited from mobile clinics in Moscow, Russia, and randomized into three groups. Groups 1 and 2 received structured injection training, and group 3 did not. Group 1 received 4-mm needles sufficient for each injection; groups 2 and 3 provided their own needle supply. Changes in insulin total daily dose (TDD), injection technique, needle reuse, and lipohypertrophy (LH) were assessed.


Of 120 patients enrolled, 116 were included in all analyses (group 1, n = 43; group 2, n = 35; group 3, n = 38). At 6 months, mean [95% CI] reductions in A1C were significant in groups 1 and 2 (− 1.00% [10.9 mmol/mol (− 1.3 to − 0.6)] and − 1.00% [10.9 mmol/mol (− 1.4 to − 0.7)], respectively; P < 0.001 for both), but not in group 3 (− 0.02% [0.2 mmol/mol (− 1.2 to 1.6)]). Increases in insulin TDD, however, were similar and significant across groups (approximately 6 IU; P < 0.05). Injection technique improved, and needle reuse and LH declined in groups 1 and 2, but not in group 3.


Little is known about the glycemic impact of insulin injection training. We found that structured training and the use of short pen needles can improve injection technique, leading to significant A1C reductions and decreased rates of LH.
International Diabetes Federation Clinical Guidelines Task Force. Global guideline for type 2 diabetes. Brussels: Int Diabetes Federation; 2012.
Gururaj Setty S, Crasto W, Jarvis J, Khunti K, Davies MJ. New insulins and newer insulin regimens: a review of their role in improving glycaemic control in patients with diabetes. Postgrad Med J. 2016;92:152–64. CrossRefPubMed
Kostev K, Dippel FW, Rathmann W. Glycemic control after initiating basal insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: a primary care database analysis. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2015;8:45–8. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
American Diabetes Association. Professional Practice Committee for the Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2016. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:S107–8. CrossRef
Pimouguet C, Le Goff M, Thiebaut R, Dartigues JF, Helmer C. Effectiveness of disease-management programs for improving diabetes care: a meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2011;183:E115–27. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Norris SL, Lau J, Smith SJ, Schmid CH, Engelgau MM. Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:1159–71. CrossRefPubMed
Forum for injection technique (FIT). 2014. http://​www.​fit4diabetes.​com/​. Accessed 22 Aug 2016.
American Association of Diabetes Educators. Strategies for insulin injection therapy in diabetes self-management. 2011. https://​www.​diabeteseducator​.​org/​docs/​default-source/​legacy-docs/​_​resources/​pdf/​research/​aade_​meded.​pdf?​sfvrsn=​2. Accessed 21 Sep 2016.
Frid AH, Kreugel G, Grassi G, et al. New insulin delivery recommendations. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91:1231–55. CrossRefPubMed
Grassi G, Scuntero P, Trepiccioni R, Marubbi F, Strauss K. Optimizing insulin injection technique and its effect on blood glucose control. J Clin Trans Endocrinol. 2014;1:145–50.
Frid AH, Hirsch LJ, Menchior AR, Morel DR, Strauss KW. Worldwide Injection Technique Questionnaire Study: injecting complications and the role of the professional. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91:1224–30. CrossRefPubMed
Spollett G, Edelman SV, Mehner P, Walter C, Penfornis A. Improvement of insulin injection technique: examination of current issues and recommendations. Diabetes Educ. 2016;42:379–94. CrossRefPubMed
Blanco M, Hernandez MT, Strauss KW, Amaya M. Prevalence and risk factors of lipohypertrophy in insulin-injecting patients with diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2013;39:445–53. CrossRefPubMed
Ji J, Lou Q. Insulin pen injection technique survey in patients with type 2 diabetes in mainland China in 2010. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014;30:1087–93. CrossRefPubMed
Frid AH, Hirsch LJ, Menchior AR, Morel DR, Strauss KW. Worldwide injection technique questionnaire study: population parameters and injection practices. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91:1212–23. CrossRefPubMed
Vardar B, Kizilci S. Incidence of lipohypertrophy in diabetic patients and a study of influencing factors. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007;77:231–6. CrossRefPubMed
Johansson UB, Amsberg S, Hannerz L, et al. Impaired absorption of insulin aspart from lipohypertrophic injection sites. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:2025–7. CrossRefPubMed
Famulla S, Hovelmann U, Fischer A, et al. Insulin injection into lipohypertrophic tissue: blunted and more variable insulin absorption and action and impaired postprandial glucose control. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:1486–92. CrossRefPubMed
Hirsch L, Byron K, Gibney M. Intramuscular risk at insulin injection sites–measurement of the distance from skin to muscle and rationale for shorter-length needles for subcutaneous insulin therapy. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014;16:867–73. CrossRefPubMed
Bergenstal RM, Strock ES, Peremislov D, Gibney MA, Parvu V, Hirsch LJ. Safety and efficacy of insulin therapy delivered via a 4 mm pen needle in obese patients with diabetes. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90:329–38. CrossRefPubMed
National Quality Forum. Comprehensive diabetes care: hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) poor control (> 9.0%). Measure 0059. 2016. http://​www.​qualityforum.​org/​Project_​Details.​aspx?​id=​20590. Accessed 18 Nov 2016.
De Coninck C, Frid A, Gaspar R, et al. Results and analysis of the 2008–2009 insulin injection technique questionnaire survey. J Diabetes. 2010;2:168–79. CrossRefPubMed
UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33. Lancet. 1998;352:837–53. CrossRef
Cukierman-Yaffe T, Gerstein HC, Williamson JD, et al. Relationship between baseline glycemic control and cognitive function in individuals with type 2 diabetes and other cardiovascular risk factors: the action to control cardiovascular risk in diabetes-memory in diabetes (ACCORD-MIND) trial. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:221–6. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Pastors JG, Warshaw H, Daly A, Franz M, Kulkarni K. The evidence for the effectiveness of medical nutrition therapy in diabetes management. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:608–13. CrossRefPubMed

New additions to the Adis Journal Club

A selection of topical peer-reviewed articles from the Adis journals, curated by the editors.

GLP-1 receptor agonists

Browse the latest news, clinical trial updates, and expert commentary.