Skip to main content
Top

11-21-2018 | Inpatient diabetes | Review | Article

Innovations in Professional Inpatient Diabetes Education

Journal: Current Diabetes Reports

Authors: Ashkan Zand, Karim Ibrahim, Archana R. Sadhu

Publisher: Springer US

share
SHARE

Abstract

Purpose of review

In the rapidly evolving and complex field of inpatient diabetes, complex care teams of physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, nurses, and pharmacists are challenged to remain well informed of the latest clinical treatments and health care trends. Traditional continuing medical education (CME) and continuing education unit (CEU) strategies that require travel and/or time away from work pose a major barrier. With advancements in technology, there are media and other electronic strategies for delivering CME/ CEU that may overcome these current challenges.

Recent Findings

Electronic and internet-based formats are growing due to their convenience, ease of use, lower cost, and ready access to large audiences. Some formats are already being used such as computer-based programs, simulations, and mobile CMEs and CEUs. Other strategies could be further explored including hospital credentialing, stewardship programs, and interdisciplinary health care professional education. However, there is little data on the utilization and efficacy of these newer formats.

Summary

While traditional CME/CEU meetings prevail, there is a need and an emerging trend using electronic and internet based strategies that are particularly suited for inpatient diabetes education. These methods show great potential and deserve further exploration and development.
Literature
2.
Continuing Education - AANPCP [Internet]. Aanpcert.​org. 2018 [cited 23 July 2018]. Available from: http://​www.​aanpcert.​org/​recert/​ce
3.
Continuing Medical Education (CME) for Physician Assistants - NCCPA [Internet]. Nccpa.​net. 2018 [cited 23 July 2018]. Available from: http://​www.​nccpa.​net/​ContinuingMedica​lEducation
4.
Continuing Education [Internet]. Pharmacist.​com. 2018 [cited 23 July 2018]. Available from: https://​www.​pharmacist.​com/​education
5.
Curran V, Fleet L. A review of evaluation outcomes of web-based continuing medical education. Med Educ. 2005;39:561–7. CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zimitat C. Designing effective on-line continuing medical education. Medical Teacher. 2001;23:117–22. CrossRefPubMed
7.
Crenshaw K, Curry W, Salanitro A, Safford M, Houston T, Allison J, et al. Is physician engagement with web-based CME associated with patientsʼ baseline hemoglobin A1c levels? The rural diabetes online care study. Acad Med. 2010;85:1511–7. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Tatti P, Lehmann E. Utility of the AIDA diabetes simulator as an interactive educational teaching tool for general practitioners (primary care physicians). Diabetes Technol Ther. 2001;3:133–40. CrossRefPubMed
9.•
Diehl LA, Souza RM, Gordan PA, Esteves RZ, Coelho ICM. InsuOnline, an electronic game for medical education on insulin therapy: a randomized controlled trial with primary care physicians. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2017;19. This study provides recent data of the utilization of virtual stimulation as method for continue education among providers as compare to lecture format.
10.
Sullivan M, O'Brien C, Gitelman S, Shapiro S, Rushakoff R. Impact of an interactive online nursing educational module on insulin errors in hospitalized pediatric patients. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:1744–6. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Vaidya A, Hurwitz S, Yialamas M, Min L, Garg R. Improving the management of diabetes in hospitalized patients: the results of a computer-based house staff training program. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012;14:610–8. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Tamler R, Green DE, Skamagas M, Breen TL, Lu K, Looker HC, et al. Durability of the effect of online diabetes training for medical residents on knowledge, confidence, and inpatient glycemia. Journal of Diabetes. 2012;4:281–90. CrossRefPubMed
13.
Wakefield PL, Wilson MA. Enhancing nurses’ knowledge regarding the complex care of hospitalized patients on insulin. J Nurses Prof Dev. 2014;30:174–80. CrossRefPubMed
14.
Taylor CG, Morris C, Rayman G. An interactive 1-h educational programme for junior doctors, increases their confidence and improves inpatient diabetes care. Diabet Med. 2012;29:1574–8. CrossRefPubMed
15.
Podcasting Historical Timeline|International Podcast Day [Internet]. International Podcast Day. 2018 [cited 23 July 2018]. Available from: https://​internationalpod​castday.​com/​podcasting-history/​
16.
Ruiz J, Mintzer M, Leipzig R. The impact of E-learning in medical education. Acad Med. 2006;81:207–112. CrossRefPubMed
17.
Sanaiey N. The comparative study of the effectiveness of using E-learning, blended learning and presence learning in continuous medical education. World Journal of Medical Sciences. 2014;10:488–93.
18.
Al-Azri H, Ratnapalan S. Problem-based learning in continuing medical education: review of randomized controlled trials. Can Fam Physician. 2014;60:157–65. PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Cheston C, Flickinger T, Chisolm M. Social media use in medical education. Acad Med. 2013;88:893–901. CrossRefPubMed
20.
Ventola CL. Social media and health care professionals: benefits, risks, and best practices. Pharmacy and Therapeutics. 2014;39:491–520. PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Professionalism in the Use of Social Media | American Medical Association [Internet]. Ama-assn.​org. 2018 [cited 23 July 2018]. Available from: https://​www.​ama-assn.​org/​delivering-care/​professionalism-use-social-media
23.
[Internet]. Ncsbn.​org. 2018 [cited 10 October 2018]. Available from: https://​www.​ncsbn.​org/​NCSBN_​SocialMedia.​pdf
24.
Umpierrez GE. Hyperglycemia: an independent marker of in-hospital mortality in patients with undiagnosed diabetes. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2002;87:978–82. CrossRef
25.
High-Alert Medications in Acute Care Settings [Internet]. Institute for Safe Medication Practices. [cited 2018Sep3]. Available from: https://​www.​ismp.​org/​recommendations/​high-alert-medications-acute-list
26.
•• Calligaro KD, Amankwah KS, D’ Ayala M, et al. Guidelines for hospital privileges in vascular surgery and endovascular interventions: recommendations for the Society for Vascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67(5):1337–44. The Vascular Surgery Society has put forward a recommendation in their guidelines that ensure that hospital privileges are granted to physicians with recognized training, certification, and demonstration of clinical experience for any vascular surgery and endovascular interventions.
27.
NQF: Prioritization of High-Impact Conditions [Internet]. Qualityforum.​org. 2018 [cited 21 July 2018]. Available from: http://​www.​qualityforum.​org/​projects/​prioritization.​aspx?​section=​ MeasurePrioritizatinAdvisoryCommitteeReport2010-05-24.
29.
APIC | Antimicrobial stewardship [Internet]. Apic.​org. 2018 [cited 20 July 2018]. Available from: https://​apic.​org/​Professional-Practice/​Practice-Resources/​Antimicrobial-Stewardship
30.
Doron S, Davidson L. Antimicrobial stewardship. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011;86:1113–23. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
• Rushakoff J, Kornberg Z, Shah A, Rushakoff R. Virtual glucose management service: a novel resident educational tool. Medical Education. 2017;51:1174–5. This study shows the creation of a virtual glucose management service in which an endocrinology provider reviews charts while providing recommendation through the institution electronic medical record. This service is similar to the antibiotic stewardships that are currently being implemented in other institutions.
32.
Implementation and Evaluation of an Inpatient Diabetes Superuser Education Program - Full Text View - ClinicalTrials.​gov [Internet]. Clinicaltrials.​gov. 2018 [cited 23 July 2018]. Available from: https://​clinicaltrials.​gov/​ct2/​show/​NCT02847390?​term=​NCT02847390&​rank=​1
33.
Desalvo DJ, Greenberg LW, Henderson CL, Cogen FR. A learner-centered diabetes management curriculum: reducing resident errors on an inpatient diabetes pathway. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:2188–93. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral