Skip to main content
Top

04-15-2005 | Hypertension | Article

Cost-utility analyses of intensive blood glucose and tight blood pressure control in type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 72)

Journal: Diabetologia

Authors: P. M. Clarke, A. M. Gray, A. Briggs, R. J. Stevens, D. R. Matthews, R. R. Holman, on behalf of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS)

Publisher: Springer-Verlag

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis

This study estimated the economic efficiency (1) of intensive blood glucose control and tight blood pressure control in patients with type 2 diabetes who also had hypertension, and (2) of metformin therapy in type 2 diabetic patients who were overweight.

Methods

We conducted cost-utility analysis based on patient-level data from a randomised clinical controlled trial involving 4,209 patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes conducted in 23 hospital-based clinics in England, Scotland and Northern Ireland as part of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS). Three different policies were evaluated: intensive blood glucose control with sulphonylurea/insulin; intensive blood glucose control with metformin for overweight patients; and tight blood pressure control of hypertensive patients. Incremental cost : effectiveness ratios were calculated based on the net cost of healthcare resources associated with these policies and on effectiveness in terms of quality-adjusted life years gained, estimated over a lifetime from within-trial effects using the UKPDS Outcomes Model.

Results

The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life years gained (in year 2004 UK prices) for intensive blood glucose control was £6,028, and for blood pressure control was £369. Metformin therapy was cost-saving and increased quality-adjusted life expectancy.

Conclusions/interpretation

Each of the three policies evaluated has a lower cost per quality-adjusted life year gained than that of many other accepted uses of healthcare resources. The results provide an economic rationale for ensuring that care of patients with type 2 diabetes corresponds at least to the levels of these interventions.
Literature
1.
UKPDS Group (1998) Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 352:837–853
2.
Gray A, Raikou M, McGuire A et al (2000) Cost effectiveness of an intensive blood glucose control policy in patients with type 2 diabetes: economic analysis alongside randomised controlled trial (UKPDS 41). BMJ 320:1373–1378
3.
UKPDS Group (1998) Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 38). BMJ 317:703–713
4.
UKPDS Group (1998) Cost effectiveness analysis of improved blood pressure control in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 40). BMJ 317:720–726
5.
UKPDS Group (1998) Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet 352:854–865
6.
Clarke P, Gray A, Adler A et al (2001) Cost-effectiveness analysis of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin in overweight patients with type II diabetes (UKPDS No. 51). Diabetologia 44:298–304
7.
Torrance GW (1986) Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal: a review. J Health Econ 5:1–30
8.
NICE (2004) Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. National Institute for Clinical Excellence, London
9.
UKPDS Group (1991) UK Prospective diabetes study VIII: study design, progress and performance. Diabetologia 34:877–890
10.
Netten A, Curtis L (2003) Unit costs of health and social care 2003. Personal Social Services Research Unit, Canterbury, Kent (University of Kent)
11.
Gray A, Clarke P, Farmer A, Holman R (2002) Implementing intensive control of blood glucose concentration and blood pressure in type 2 diabetes in England: cost analysis (UKPDS 63). BMJ 325:860
12.
Clarke P, Gray A, Legood R, Briggs A, Holman R (2003) The impact of diabetes-related complications on healthcare costs: results from the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS 65). Diabetes Med 20:442–450
13.
HM Treasury (2003) The green book: appraisal and evaluation in central government: treasury guidance. The Stationery Office, London
14.
UKPDS Group (1999) Quality of life in type 2 diabetic patients is affected by complications but not by intensive policies to improve blood glucose or blood pressure control (UKPDS 37). Diabetes Care 22:1125–1136
15.
DCCT (1996) Lifetime benefits and costs of intensive therapy as practiced in the diabetes control and complications trial. The diabetes control and complications trial research group. JAMA 276:1409–1415
16.
Clarke P, Gray A, Holman R (2002) Estimating utility values for health states of type 2 diabetic patients using the EQ-5D (UKPDS 62). Med Decis Making 22:340–349
17.
Clarke P, Gray A, Briggs A et al (2004) A model to estimate the lifetime health outcomes of patients with Type 2 diabetes: the United Kingdom prospective diabetes study (UKPDS) outcomes model (UKPDS 68). Diabetologia 47:1747–1759
18.
Brown JB, Russell A, Chan W, Pedula K, Aickin M (2000) The global diabetes model: user friendly version 3.0. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 50:S15–S46
19.
Hougaard P (2000) Analysis of multivariate survival data (statistics for biology and health). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
20.
Van Hout B, Al MJ, Gordon GS, Rutten FF (1994) Costs, effects and C/E-ratios alongside a clinical trial. Health Econ 3:309–319
21.
Stinnett AA, Mullahy J (1997) The negative side of cost-effectiveness analysis. JAMA 277:1931–1932
22.
Rawlins MD, Culyer AJ (2004) National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments. BMJ 329:224–227
23.
CDC Group (2002) Cost-effectiveness of intensive glycemic control, intensified hypertension control, and serum cholesterol level reduction for type 2 diabetes. JAMA 287:2542–2551
24.
Audit Commission (2000) Testing times: a review of diabetes services in England and Wales. Audit Commission, London

Be confident that your patient care is up to date

Medicine Matters is being incorporated into Springer Medicine, our new medical education platform. 

Alongside the news coverage and expert commentary you have come to expect from Medicine Matters diabetes, Springer Medicine's complimentary membership also provides access to articles from renowned journals and a broad range of Continuing Medical Education programs. Create your free account »