Skip to main content
Top

13-11-2017 | Vildagliptin | Article

Factors that may Account for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction with a Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor, Vildagliptin, in Young Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Journal: Diabetes Therapy

Authors: Marc Evans, Plamen Kozlovski, Päivi M. Paldánius, James E. Foley, Vaishali Bhosekar, Carmen Serban, Angelo Avogaro

Publisher: Springer Healthcare

Abstract

Introduction

In a meta-analysis, we observed a significant 37% relative risk reduction in prospectively adjudicated major adverse cardiac events [MACEs, comprising of non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, cardiovascular (CV) death] with vildagliptin vs. comparators in younger (< 65 years) patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), while the risk was similar in older patients (≥ 65 years). We carried out an exploratory analysis to identify the patient characteristics and on-treatment effects that may have contributed to the different outcomes in the two age groups.

Methods

On-treatment differences (vildagliptin vs. comparators) for the change from baseline in CV risk factors were analyzed using an analysis of covariance model with the baseline value for each variable of interest, treatment and study as covariates. Additional adjustments for background antihypertensive and statin use were performed when analyzing changes in blood pressure and lipids, respectively. Baseline characteristics and patient demographics were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results

Patients aged < 65 years had shorter diabetes duration (4.4 vs. 8.2 years) and slightly higher glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at baseline (8.3% vs. 8.0%) than patients aged ≥ 65 years. More patients in the  ≥ 65 year age group had hypertension (73.1% vs. 51.3%), dyslipidemia (53.3% vs. 43.9%) and a history of CV events (32.2% vs. 12.9%). There were small, but statistically significant differences in the change in HbA1c and total cholesterol in favor of vildagliptin relative to comparators, which were similar in both age groups. Significant differences were observed in the reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) (− 0.52 mmHg; 95% CI − 0.97, − 0.07; p = 0.023), low-density lipoprotein (LDL cholesterol) (− 0.12 mmol/l; 95% CI − 0.19, − 0.04; p = 0.002) and weight (− 0.48 kg; 95% CI − 0.95, − 0.01; p < 0.047) in patients < 65 years, but not in patients ≥ 65 years. The incidence of hypoglycemic events was lower in patients treated with vildagliptin [2.1 and 3.5 per 100 subject years exposure (SYEs) in < 65 and ≥ 65 years, respectively] than with comparators (5.8 and 7.5 per 100 SYEs, respectively).

Conclusion

Based on our findings, it can be hypothesized that the positive effects of vildagliptin on SBP, LDL cholesterol, hypoglycemia and weight observed in younger, but not in older patients could be associated with the lower risk of MACE in younger patients with T2DM.

Funding

Novartis.
Literature
1.
The Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration, Sarwar N, Gao P, et al. Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet. 2010;375:2215–22.CrossRefPubMedCentral
2.
The Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration, Di Angelantonio ED, Gao P, et al. Glycated hemoglobin measurement and prediction of cardiovascular disease. JAMA. 2014;311:1225–33.CrossRefPubMedCentral
3.
Boccara F, Cohen A. Interplay of diabetes and coronary heart disease on cardiovascular mortality. Heart. 2004;90:1371–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
White WB, Kupfer S, Zannad F, et al. Cardiovascular mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and recent acute coronary syndromes from the EXAMINE trial. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:1267–73.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Guidance for industry: diabetes mellitus—evaluating cardiovascular risk in new antidiabetic therapies to treat type 2 diabetes (2008). www.​fda.​gov/​downloads/​Drugs/​GuidanceComplian​ceRegulatoryInfo​rmation/​Guidances/​ucm071627.​pdf. Accessed 18 Apr 2016.
6.
Scirica BM, Bhatt DL, Braunwald E, et al. Saxagliptin and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Eng J Med. 2013;369:1317–26.CrossRef
7.
White WB, Cannon CP, Heller SR, et al. Alogliptin after acute coronary syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1327–35.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Green JB, Bethel MA, Armstrong PW, et al. Effect of sitagliptin on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Eng J Med. 2015;373:232–42.CrossRef
9.
Schweizer A, Dejager S, Foley JE, et al. Assessing the cardio-cerebrovascular safety of vildagliptin: meta-analysis of adjudicated events from a large phase III type 2 diabetes population. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2010;12:485–94.CrossRefPubMed
10.
McInnes G, Evans M, Del Prato S, et al. Cardiovascular and heart failure safety profile of vildagliptin: a meta-analysis of 17,000 patients. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015;17:1085–92.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report: Estimates of Diabetes and Its Burden in the United States, 2014. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2014). https://​www.​cdc.​gov/​diabetes/​pubs/​statsreport14/​national-diabetes-report-web.​pdf. Accessed 25 May 2017.
12.
The Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration, Seshasai SR, Kaptoge S, et al. Diabetes mellitus, fasting glucose, and risk of cause-specific death. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:829–41.CrossRefPubMedCentral
13.
Strain WD, Paldánius PM. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor development and post-authorisation programme for vildagliptin—clinical evidence for optimised management of chronic diseases beyond type 2 diabetes. Eur Endocrinol. 2017;13:62–7.CrossRef
14.
Pscherer S, Kostev K, Rockel T, Dworak M. HbA1c reduction in type 2 diabetes patients in clinical practice: comparison between vildagliptin and other DPP-4 inhibitors. Perfusion. 2011;24:206–11.
15.
Evans M, Schweizer A, Foley JE. Blood pressure and fasting lipid changes after 24 weeks’ treatment with vildagliptin: a pooled analysis in > 2000 previously drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2016;12:1–4.
16.
Aryangat AV, Gerich JE. Type 2 diabetes: postprandial hyperglycemia and increased cardiovascular risk. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2010;6:145–55.PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Martín-Timón I, Sevillano-Collantes C, Segura-Galindo A, et al. Type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease: have all risk factors the same strength? World J Diabetes. 2014;5:444–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Gokhale M, Buse JB, Jonsson M, et al. No increased risk of cardiovascular events in older adults initiating dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors versus therapeutic alternatives. 2017. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19:970–8.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Gæde P, Vedel P, Larsen N, et al. Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:383–93.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Gæde P, Lund-Andersen H, Parving HH, et al. Effect of a multifactorial intervention on mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:580–91.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Bain S, Druyts E, Balijepalli C, et al. Cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality associated with sulphonylureas compared with other antihyperglycaemic drugs: a Bayesian meta-analysis of survival data. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19:329–35.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Marx N, Rosenstock J, Kahn SE, et al. Design and baseline characteristics of the CARdiovascular Outcome Trial of LINAgliptin Versus Glimepiride in Type 2 Diabetes (CAROLINA®). Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2015;12:164–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Vaccaro O, Masulli M, Bonora E, et al. Addition of either pioglitazone or a sulfonylurea in type 2 diabetic patients inadequately controlled with metformin alone: impact on cardiovascular events. A randomized controlled trial. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2012;22:997–1006.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, et al. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Eng J Med. 2015;373:2117–28.CrossRef
25.
Marso SP, Daniels GH, Brown-Frandsen K, et al. Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Eng J Med. 2016;375:311–22.CrossRef
26.
Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW, et al. Canagliflozin and cardiovascular and renal events in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:644–57.CrossRefPubMed
27.
UK Prospective Diabetes Study. (UKPDS) Group. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet. 1998;352:854–65.CrossRef
28.
Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, et al. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1577–89.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Del Prato S, Foley JE, Kothny W, et al. Study to determine the durability of glycaemic control with early treatment with a vildagliptin-metformin combination regimen vs. standard-of-care metformin monotherapy—the VERIFY trial: a randomized double-blind trial. Diabet Med. 2014;31:1178–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2015: a patient-centered approach: update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015;38:140–9.CrossRefPubMed

Be confident that your patient care is up to date

Medicine Matters is being incorporated into Springer Medicine, our new medical education platform. 

Alongside the news coverage and expert commentary you have come to expect from Medicine Matters diabetes, Springer Medicine's complimentary membership also provides access to articles from renowned journals and a broad range of Continuing Medical Education programs. Create your free account »