Skip to main content
Top

19-12-2017 | Pregnancy | Case report | Article

Successful glycemic control using a flash glucose monitoring system for a pregnant woman with diabetes: a case report

Journal: Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders

Authors: Miyako Kishimoto, Saori Tamada, Yoko Oshiba

Publisher: BioMed Central

Abstract

Background

Glucose control for pregnant women with glucose intolerance is important, as hyperglycemia may adversely affect the mother and the fetus.

Case presentation

We report the case of a pregnant Japanese woman who experienced gestational diabetes mellitus during her first pregnancy and developed impaired glucose tolerance after the delivery. During her second pregnancy with twins, she required up to 75 units of injected insulin to control her postprandial hyperglycemia and occasionally experienced hypoglycemia. We used a newly developed flash glucose monitoring system, which allowed her to successfully achieve ideal glycemic control and experience an uncomplicated delivery.

Conclusion

We suggest that this flash glucose monitoring system may be clinically effective for similar cases that involve pregnant women with abnormal glucose tolerance.
Literature
1.
Chen P, Wang S, Ji J, et al. Risk factors and management of gestational diabetes. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2015;71:689–94.CrossRefPubMed
2.
HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group, Metzger BE, Lowe LP, Dyer AR, et al. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1991–2002.CrossRef
3.
American Diabetes Association. Management of diabetes in pregnancy. Sec. 13. In standards of medical Care in Diabetes-2017. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(Suppl.1):S114–9.CrossRef
4.
Holmes VA, Young IS, Patterson CC, et al. Diabetes and Pre-eclampsia Intervention Trial Study Group. Optimal glycemic control, pre-eclampsia, and gestational hypertension in women with type 1 diabetes in the diabetes and pre-eclampsia intervention trial. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:1683–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Dabelea D, Hanson RL, Lindsay RS, et al. Intrauterine exposure to diabetes conveys risks for type 2 diabetes and obesity: a study of discordant sibships. Diabetes. 2000;49:2208–11.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Kim C, Newton KM, Knopp RH. Gestational diabetes and the incidence of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:1862–8.CrossRefPubMed
7.
O'Sullivan JB. Diabetes mellitus after GDM. Diabetes. 1991;40(Suppl 2):131–5.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Bellamy L, Casas JP, Hingorani AD, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2009;373:1773–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
FreeStyle Libre Flash Glucose Monitoring System. https://​www.​freestylelibre.​us/​. Accessed 3 Nov 2017.
10.
Bolinder J, Antuna R, Geelhoed-Duijvestijn P, et al. Novel glucose-sensing technology and hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, non-masked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388:2254–63.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Haak T, Hanaire H, Ajjan R, et al. Flash glucose-sensing technology as a replacement for blood glucose monitoring for the Management of Insulin-Treated Type 2 diabetes: a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Ther. 2017;8:55–73.CrossRefPubMed
12.
FreeStyle Libre Indications and Important Safety Information. https://​www.​myfreestyle.​com/​provider/​. Accessed 3 Nov 2017.
13.
Heinemann L, Freckmann G. CGM versus FGM; or, continuous glucose monitoring is not flash glucose monitoring. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015;9:947–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Hoss U, Budiman ES, Liu H, et al. Feasibility of factory calibration for subcutaneous glucose sensors in subjects with diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014;8:89–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Bailey T, Bode BW, Christiansen MP, et al. The performance and usability of a factory-calibrated flash glucose monitoring system. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015;17:787–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Aberer F, Hajnsek M, Rumpler M, et al. Evaluation of subcutaneous glucose monitoring systems under routine environmental conditions in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19:1051–5.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Basu A, Dube S, Slama M, et al. Time lag of glucose from intravascular to interstitial compartment in humans. Diabetes. 2013;62:4083–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Basu A, Dube S, Veettil S, et al. Time lag of glucose from intravascular to interstitial compartment in type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015;9:63–8.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Reader D, Splett P, Gunderson EP, Diabetes Care and Education Dietetic Practice Group. Impact of gestational diabetes mellitus nutrition practice guidelines implemented by registered dietitians on pregnancy outcomes. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106:1426–33.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Moss JR, et al. Australian Carbohydrate Intolerance Study in Pregnant Women (ACHOIS) Trial Group. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2477–86.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Langer O, Rodriguez DA, Xenakis EM, et al. Intensified versus conventional management of gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:1036–47.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice bulletin no. 137: gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:406–16.CrossRef
23.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, ACOG Joint Editorial Committee. ACOG practice bulletin #56: multiple gestation: complicated twin, triplet, and high-order multifetal pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:869–83.CrossRef
24.
Schwartz DB, Daoud Y, Zazula P, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus: metabolic and blood glucose parameters in singleton versus twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181:912–4.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Lai FY, Johnson JA, Dover D, et al. Outcomes of singleton and twin pregnancies complicated by pre-existing diabetes and gestational diabetes: a population-based study in Alberta, Canada, 2005-11. J Diabetes. 2016;8:45–55.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Buhling KJ, Henrich W, Starr E, et al. Risk for gestational diabetes and hypertension for women with twin pregnancy compared to singleton pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2003;269:33–6.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Lucovnik M, Blickstein I, Verdenik I, et al. Impact of pre-gravid body mass index and body mass index change on preeclampsia and gestational diabetes in singleton and twin pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27:1901–4.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Morikawa M, Yamada T, Akaishi R, et al. Prevalence of hyperglycaemia in singleton versus twin pregnancy. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2015;31:198–203.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Poulain C, Duhamel A, Garabedian C, et al. Outcome of twin pregnancies associated with glucose intolerance. Diabetes Metab. 2015;41:387–92.CrossRefPubMed

Be confident that your patient care is up to date

Medicine Matters is being incorporated into Springer Medicine, our new medical education platform. 

Alongside the news coverage and expert commentary you have come to expect from Medicine Matters diabetes, Springer Medicine's complimentary membership also provides access to articles from renowned journals and a broad range of Continuing Medical Education programs. Create your free account »