Skip to main content
Top

04-03-2017 | Injection pens | Article

Errors in the Administration Technique of Insulin Pen Devices: A Result of Insufficient Education

Journal: Diabetes Therapy

Authors: Teresa H. Truong, Trang T. Nguyen, Becky L. Armor, Jamie R. Farley

Publisher: Springer Healthcare

Abstract

Insulin is a high-alert medication in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Insulin can cause significant harm when administered in error. Despite advancements in insulin pen technology, errors in the administration technique remain an issue. Although various factors can contribute to administration errors, lack of education on how to operate these devices is one of the most common reasons they occur. As such, the mechanical technique used by the patient needs to be continually assessed in order to reinforce education where needed. We describe three unique patient cases that depict incorrect administration techniques when using pen devices and the consequences that could have resulted from these errors. These cases involve the use of a syringe instead of a pen needle, injecting without removing the inner cap, and dialing the pen back down instead of pushing the plunger. Although pen devices are relatively simple to use, this article reinforces the need for continual assessment of and education about insulin administration. The teach-back method is an approach that can be used to assess a patient’s technique and re-educate them at every available opportunity to reduce the risk of administration errors, which can result in complications and hospitalizations.
Literature
1.
American Diabetes Association. Fast facts data and statistics about diabetes. Article online. 2015. Available from: http://​professional.​diabetes.​org/​sites/​professional.​diabetes.​org/​files/​media/​Fast_​Facts_​12-2015a_​1.​pdf. Accessed 7 Feb 2017.
2.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diabetes public health resource. Age-adjusted percentage of adults with diabetes using diabetes medication, by type of medication, United States, 1997–2011. Article online. 2013. Available from: http://​www.​cdc.​gov/​diabetes/​statistics/​meduse/​fig2.​htm. Accessed 7 Feb 2017.
3.
Pharmacy Times. Top drugs of 2013. Article online. 2014. Available from: http://​www.​pharmacytimes.​com/​publications/​issue/​2014/​July2014/​Top-Drugs-of-2013. Accessed 7 Feb 2017.
4.
Geller AI, Shehab N, Lovegrove MC, et al. National estimates of insulin-related hypoglycemia and errors leading to emergency department visits and hospitalizations. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(5):678–86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Institute for Safe Medication Practices. ISMP high-alert medications. Article online. 2014. Available from: http://​www.​ismp.​org/​Tools/​highAlertMedicat​ionLists.​asp. Accessed 7 Feb 2017.
6.
Cousins D, Rosario C, Scarpello J. Insulin, hospitals and harm: a review of patient safety incidents reported to the National Patient Safety Agency. Clin Med. 2011;11:28–30.CrossRef
7.
Perfetti R. Reusable and disposable insulin pens for the treatment of diabetes: understanding the global differences in user preference and an evaluation of inpatient insulin pen use. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010;12(Suppl 1):S79–85.PubMed
8.
Molife C, Lee LJ, Shi L, Sawhney M, Lenox SM. Assessment of patient-reported outcomes of insulin pen devices versus conventional vial and syringe. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016;11:529–38.CrossRef
9.
Cuddihy RM, Borgman SK. Considerations for diabetes: treatment with insulin pen devices. Am J Ther. 2013;20(6):694–702.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Korytkowski M, Bell D, Jacobsen C, Suwannasari R. A multicenter, randomized, open-label, comparative, two-period crossover trial of preference, efficacy, and safety profiles of a prefilled, disposable pen and conventional vial/syringe for insulin injection in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Ther. 2003;25(11):2836–48.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Korytkowski M, Niskanen L, Asakura T. FlexPen: addressing issues of confidence and convenience in insulin delivery. Clin Ther. 2005;27(suppl B):S89–100.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Magwire ML. Addressing barriers to insulin therapy: the role of insulin pens. Am J Ther. 2011;18(5):392–402.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Graff MR, McClanahan MA. Assessment by patients with diabetes mellitus of two insulin pen delivery systems versus a vial and syringe. Clin Ther. 1998;20:486–96.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Grabner M, Chu J, Raparla S, Quimbo R, Zhou S, Conoshenti J. Clinical and economic outcomes among patients with diabetes mellitus initiating insulin glargine pen versus vial. Postgrad Med. 2013;125(3):204–13.CrossRefPubMed
15.
US Food and Drug Administration. Classify your medical device. Article online. 2014. Available from: http://​www.​fda.​gov/​MedicalDevices/​DeviceRegulation​andGuidance/​Overview/​ClassifyYourDevi​ce/​. Accessed 7 Feb 2017.
16.
Spollett G, Edelman S, Mehner P, Walter C, Penfornis A. Improvement of insulin injection technique: examination of current issues and recommendations. Diab Edu. 2016;42(4):379–94.CrossRef
17.
Stacciarini TSG, Pace AE, Haas VJ. Insulin self-administration technique with disposable syringe among patients with diabetes mellitus followed by the family health strategy. Rev Latino-am Enfermagem. 2009;17(4):474–80.CrossRef
18.
De Coninck C, Frid A, Gaspar R, et al. Results and analysis of the 2008–2009 Insulin Injection Technique Questionnaire survey. J Diabetes. 2010;2(3):168–79.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Nakatani Y, Matsumura M, Monden T, Aso Y, Nakamoto T. Improvement of glycemic control by re-education in insulin technique in patients with diabetes mellitus. Adv Ther. 2013;30(10):897–906.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Arcebido R, Wong E, Cohen V, Likourezos A. Pharmacist-led discharge counseling on subcutaneous insulin use and administration. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 2013;70(16):1371–3.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Iowa Healthcare System. Always use teach-back! Article online. 2015. Available from: http://​www.​teachbacktrainin​g.​org/​. Accessed 7 Feb 2017.
22.
Institute for Ethics. The Commonwealth Fund. Promising practices for patient-centered communication with vulnerable populations: examples from eight hospitals. Article online. 2006. Available from: http://​www.​commonwealthfund​.​org/​~/​media/​files/​publications/​fund-report/​2006/​aug/​promising-practices-for-patient-centered-communication-with-vulnerable-populations–examples-from-ei/​wynia_​promisingpractic​espatientcentere​d_​947-pdf.​pdf. Accessed 7 Feb 2017.
23.
National Quality Forum. Safe practices for better healthcare, 2010 update. A consensus report. Article online. 2010. Available from: http://​www.​qualityforum.​org/​Publications/​2010/​04/​Safe_​Practices_​for_​Better_​Healthcare_​%E2%80%93_​2010_​Update.​aspx. Accessed 7 Feb 2017.

Be confident that your patient care is up to date

Medicine Matters is being incorporated into Springer Medicine, our new medical education platform. 

Alongside the news coverage and expert commentary you have come to expect from Medicine Matters diabetes, Springer Medicine's complimentary membership also provides access to articles from renowned journals and a broad range of Continuing Medical Education programs. Create your free account »