Skip to main content
Top

18-04-2018 | Epidemiology | Review | Article

Sex Differences in the Burden and Complications of Diabetes

Journal: Current Diabetes Reports

Authors: Sanne A. E. Peters, Mark Woodward

Publisher: Springer US

Abstract

Purpose of the Review

To review the latest evidence on sex differences in the burden and complications of diabetes and discuss the potential explanations for the sex differences described.

Recent Findings

Diabetes is a strong risk factor for vascular disease, with compelling evidence that the relative risks of vascular diseases conferred by diabetes are considerably greater in women than men. The mechanisms underpinning women’s excess relative risk of vascular disease from diabetes are unknown. Sex differences in the health care provided for the prevention, management, and treatment of diabetes and its complications could contribute to women’s greater excess relative risks of diabetes complications. However, since the excess risk of vascular disease is not seen for other major vascular risk factors, inherent biological factors may be more likely to be involved. In addition to other cardiometabolic pathways, the sex dimorphism in body composition and fat distribution may be particularly important in explaining women’s greater excess risk of the vascular complications of diabetes.

Summary

There is strong evidence to suggest that diabetes is a stronger risk factor for vascular disease in women than men. Although several mechanisms may be involved, further research is needed to provide new and deeper insights into the mechanisms underpinning sex differences in the association between diabetes and vascular diseases. Such research will inform patients, health care professionals, and policy makers to ensure that women are not disproportionately affected by diabetes, and will help to reduce the burden in both sexes.
Literature
1.
International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 8th edition ed; 2017.
2.
World Health Organization. Global action plan for the prevention and control of NCDs 2013–2020. 2013. http://​apps.​who.​int/​iris/​bitstream/​10665/​94384/​1/​9789241506236_​eng.​pdf?​ua=​1.
3.
Schiebinger L, Klinge I, Sánchez de Madariaga I, Paik H, Schraudner M, Stefanick M. Gendered innovations in science, health & medicine, engineering, and environment. 2011-2017. http://​genderedinnovati​ons.​stanford.​edu/​index.​html (accessed 31-01-2018).
4.
Heidari S, Babor TF, de Castro P, Tort S, Curno M. Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use. Res Integr Peer Rev 2016; 1(2).
5.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Sex, gender and health research guide: a tool for CIHR applicants. 2018. http://​www.​cihr-irsc.​gc.​ca/​e/​32019.​html (accessed 01-02-2018).
6.
International Diabetes Federation. World Diabetes Day 2017 to focus on women and diabetes. 2017 https://​www.​idf.​org/​news/​2:​world-diabetes-day-2017-to-focus-on-women-and-diabetes.​html.
7.
•• Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4.4 million participants. Lancet. 2016;387(10027):1513–30. A landmark paper on the global trends in diabetes prevalence, in 200 countries and territories in 21 regions, by sex and from 1980 to 2014.
8.
Sarwar N, Gao P, Seshasai SR, et al. Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet. 2010;375(9733):2215–22.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Shah AD, Langenberg C, Rapsomaniki E, Denaxas S, Pujades-Rodriguez M, Gale CP, et al. Type 2 diabetes and incidence of cardiovascular diseases: a cohort study in 1.9 million people. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;3(2):105–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Peters SA, Huxley RR, Woodward M. Diabetes as a risk factor for stroke in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 64 cohorts, including 775,385 individuals and 12,539 strokes. Lancet. 2014;383(9933):1973–80.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Peters SA, Huxley RR, Woodward M. Diabetes as risk factor for incident coronary heart disease in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 64 cohorts including 858,507 individuals and 28,203 coronary events. Diabetologia. 2014;57(8):1542–51.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Huxley RR, Peters SA, Mishra GD, Woodward M. Risk of all-cause mortality and vascular events in women versus men with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;3(3):198–206.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Chatterjee S, Peters SA, Woodward M, Mejia Arango S, Batty GD, Beckett N, et al. Type 2 diabetes as a risk factor for dementia in women compared with men: a pooled analysis of 2.3 million people comprising more than 100,000 cases of dementia. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(2):300–7.PubMed
14.
Shen Y, Cai R, Sun J, Dong X, Huang R, Tian S, et al. Diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for incident chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocrine. 2017;55(1):66–76.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Woodward M, Peters SA, Huxley RR. Diabetes and the female disadvantage. Women’s Health. 2015;11(6):833–9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Mongraw-Chaffin ML, Peters SA, Huxley RR, Woodward M. The sex-specific association between BMI and coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 95 cohorts with 1.2 million participants. Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinol. 2015;3(6):437–49.CrossRef
17.
Peters SA, Huxley RR, Woodward M. Comparison of the sex-specific associations between systolic blood pressure and the risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 124 cohort studies, including 1.2 million individuals. Stroke. 2013;44(9):2394–401.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Peters SA, Singhateh Y, Mackay D, Huxley RR, Woodward M. Total cholesterol as a risk factor for cornary heart disease and stroke in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis. 2016;248:123–31.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Alegre-Diaz J, Herrington W, Lopez-Cervantes M, et al. Diabetes and cause-specific mortality in Mexico City. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(20):1961–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Fulcher J, O'Connell R, Voysey M, et al. Efficacy and safety of LDL-lowering therapy among men and women: meta-analysis of individual data from 174,000 participants in 27 randomised trials. Lancet. 2015;385(9976):1397–405.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Turnbull F, Woodward M, Neal B, Barzi F, Ninomiya T, Chalmers J, et al. Do men and women respond differently to blood pressure-lowering treatment? Results of prospectively designed overviews of randomized trials. Eur Heart J. 2008;29(21):2669–80.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Hyun KK, Redfern J, Patel A, Peiris D, Brieger D, Sullivan D, et al. Gender inequalities in cardiovascular risk factor assessment and management in primary healthcare. Heart. 2017;103(7):492–8.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zhao M, Vaartjes I, Graham I, Grobbee D, Spiering W, Klipstein-Grobusch K, et al. Sex differences in risk factor management of coronary heart disease across three regions. Heart. 2017;103(20):1587–94.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Eapen ZJ, Liang L, Shubrook JH, Bauman MA, Bufalino VJ, Bhatt DL, et al. Current quality of cardiovascular prevention for Million Hearts: an analysis of 147,038 outpatients from The Guideline Advantage. Am Heart J. 2014;168(3):398–404.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Health and Social Care Information Centre. National diabetes audit 2012–2013 - report 1: care processes and treatment targets, 2014.
26.
Kasteleyn MJ, Wezendonk A, Vos RC, Numans ME, Jansen H, Rutten GE. Repeat prescriptions of guideline-based secondary prevention medication in patients with type 2 diabetes and previous myocardial infarction in Dutch primary care. Fam Pract. 2014;31(6):688–93.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Kirkman MS, Rowan-Martin MT, Levin R, Fonseca VA, Schmittdiel JA, Herman WH, et al. Determinants of adherence to diabetes medications: findings from a large pharmacy claims database. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(4):604–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
28.
•• Peters SA, Huxley RR, Sattar N, Woodward M. Sex differences in the excess risk of cardiovascular diseases associated with type 2 diabetes: potential explanations and clinical implications. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2015;9(7):36. Review addressing the factors that might be underpinning sex differences in the cardiovascular complications of diabetes and their clinical implications. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
•• Regensteiner JG, Golden S, Huebschmann AG, et al. Sex differences in the cardiovascular consequences of diabetes mellitus: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;132(25):2424–47. Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association that provides the current state of knowledge about sex differences in the cardiovascular consequences of diabetes and areas for further research. CrossRefPubMed
30.
Donahue RP, Rejman K, Rafalson LB, Dmochowski J, Stranges S, Trevisan M. Sex differences in endothelial function markers before conversion to pre-diabetes: does the clock start ticking earlier among women? The western New York study. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(2):354–9.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Wannamethee SG, Papacosta O, Lawlor DA, Whincup PH, Lowe GD, Ebrahim S, et al. Do women exhibit greater differences in established and novel risk factors between diabetes and non-diabetes than men? The British Regional Heart Study and British Women’s Heart Health Study. Diabetologia. 2012;55(1):80–7.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19.2 million participants. Lancet. 2016;387(10026):1377–96.
33.
Logue J, Walker JJ, Colhoun HM, et al. Do men develop type 2 diabetes at lower body mass indices than women? Diabetologia. 2011;54(12):3003–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Paul S, Thomas G, Majeed A, Khunti K, Klein K. Women develop type 2 diabetes at a higher body mass index than men. Diabetologia. 2012;55(5):1556–7.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Peters SA, Huxley RR, Woodward M. Women’s reproductive health factors and body adiposity: findings from the UK Biobank. Int J Obes. 2016;40(5):803–8.CrossRef
36.
Sattar N. Gender aspects in type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiometabolic risk. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;27(4):501–7.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Sattar N, Gill JM. Type 2 diabetes as a disease of ectopic fat? BMC Med. 2014;12:123.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Randall JC, Winkler TW, Kutalik Z, Berndt SI, Jackson AU, Monda KL, et al. Sex-stratified genome-wide association studies including 270,000 individuals show sexual dimorphism in genetic loci for anthropometric traits. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(6):e1003500.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Yang L, Li L, Millwood IY, Lewington S, Guo Y, Sherliker P, et al. Adiposity in relation to age at menarche and other reproductive factors among 300 000 Chinese women: findings from China Kadoorie Biobank study. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(2):502–12.PubMed
40.
Peters SA, Woodward M. Women’s reproductive factors and incident cardiovascular disease in the UK Biobank. Heart 2018, heartjnl-2017-312289.
41.
Yang L, Li L, Millwood IY, Peters SAE, Chen Y, Guo Y, et al. Age at menarche and risk of major cardiovascular diseases: evidence of birth cohort effects from a prospective study of 300,000 Chinese women. Int J Cardiol. 2017;227:497–502.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
42.
Yang L, Li L, Peters SAE, Clarke R, Guo Y, Chen Y, et al. Age at menarche and incidence of diabetes: a prospective study of 300,000 women in China. Am J Epidemiol. 2018;187(2):190–8.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Di Angelantonio E, Gao P, Khan H, et al. Glycated hemoglobin measurement and prediction of cardiovascular disease. JAMA. 2014;311(12):1225–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
44.
Bertram MY, Vos T. Quantifying the duration of pre-diabetes. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2010;34(3):311–4.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Jovanovic L, Pettitt DJ. Gestational diabetes mellitus. JAMA. 2001;286(20):2516–8.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Harreiter J, Dovjak G, Kautzky-Willer A. Gestational diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular risk after pregnancy. Womens Health. 2014;10(1):91–108.
47.
Lowe WL Jr, Scholtens DM, Sandler V, Hayes MG. Genetics of gestational diabetes mellitus and maternal metabolism. Curr Diabetes Rep. 2016;16(2):15.CrossRef
48.
Bellamy L, Casas JP, Hingorani AD, Williams D. Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2009;373(9677):1773–9.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Sattar N, Greer IA. Pregnancy complications and maternal cardiovascular risk: opportunities for intervention and screening? BMJ. 2002;325(7356):157–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
50.
Kim C, Tabaei BP, Burke R, McEwen LN, Lash RW, Johnson SL, et al. Missed opportunities for type 2 diabetes mellitus screening among women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(9):1643–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
51.
Jaskolka D, Retnakaran R, Zinman B, Kramer CK. Sex of the baby and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in the mother: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 2015;58(11):2469–75.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Bao C, Yang X, Xu W, Luo H, Xu Z, Su C, et al. Diabetes mellitus and incidence and mortality of kidney cancer: a meta-analysis. J Diabetes Complicat. 2013;27(4):357–64.CrossRef
53.
Ben Q, Xu M, Ning X, Liu J, Hong S, Huang W, et al. Diabetes mellitus and risk of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47(13):1928–37.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Ge Z, Ben Q, Qian J, Wang Y, Li Y. Diabetes mellitus and risk of gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;23(12):1127–35.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Huang W, Ren H, Ben Q, Cai Q, Zhu W, Li Z. Risk of esophageal cancer in diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Cancer causes & control : CCC. 2012;23(2):263–72.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Kramer HU, Schottker B, Raum E, Brenner H. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and colorectal cancer: meta-analysis on sex-specific differences. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(9):1269–82.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Lee JY, Jeon I, Lee JM, Yoon JM, Park SM. Diabetes mellitus as an independent risk factor for lung cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(10):2411–23.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Noto H, Tsujimoto T, Sasazuki T, Noda M. Significantly increased risk of cancer in patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocr Pract. 2011;17(4):616–28.CrossRefPubMed
59.
Wang Y, Wang B, Yan S, Shen F, Cao H, Fan J, et al. Type 2 diabetes and gender differences in liver cancer by considering different confounding factors: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Ann Epidemiol. 2016;26(11):764–72.CrossRefPubMed
60.
Zhu Z, Wang X, Shen Z, Lu Y, Zhong S, Xu C. Risk of bladder cancer in patients with diabetes mellitus: an updated meta-analysis of 36 observational studies. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:310.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Be confident that your patient care is up to date

Medicine Matters is being incorporated into Springer Medicine, our new medical education platform. 

Alongside the news coverage and expert commentary you have come to expect from Medicine Matters diabetes, Springer Medicine's complimentary membership also provides access to articles from renowned journals and a broad range of Continuing Medical Education programs. Create your free account »