Skip to main content
Top

06-11-2018 | Diabetes self-management | Article

Exploring how patients understand and assess their diabetes control

Journal: BMC Endocrine Disorders

Authors: Anjali Gopalan, Katherine Kellom, Kevin McDonough, Marilyn M. Schapira

Publisher: BioMed Central

Abstract

Background

Poor understanding of diabetes management targets is associated with worse disease outcomes. Patients may use different information than providers to assess their diabetes control. In this study, we identify the information patients use to gauge their current level of diabetes control and explore patient-perceived barriers to understanding the hemoglobin A1c value (HbA1c).

Methods

Adults who self-reported a diagnosis of diabetes were recruited from outpatient, academically-affiliated, Internal Medicine clinics. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants and collected data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results

The mean age of the 25 participants was 56.8 years. HbA1c was one of several types of information participants used to assess diabetes control. Other information included perceived self-efficacy and adherence to self-care, the type and amount of medications taken, the presence or absence of symptoms attributed to diabetes, and feedback from self-monitoring of blood glucose. Most participants reported familiarity with the HbA1c (22 of 25), though understanding of the value’s meaning varied significantly. Inadequate diabetes education and challenges with patient-provider communication were cited as common barriers to understanding the HbA1c.

Conclusions

In addition to the HbA1c, several categories of information influenced participants’ assessments of their diabetes control. Increased provider awareness of the factors that influence patients’ perceptions of diabetes control can inform effective, patient-centered approaches for communicating vital diabetes-related information, facilitating behavior change towards improved patient outcomes.
Literature
1.
Trivedi H, et al. Self-knowledge of HbA1c in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus and its association with glycaemic control. Prim Care Diabetes. 2017;11:414–20.CrossRef
2.
Beard E, Clark M, Hurel S, Cooke D. Do people with diabetes understand their clinical marker of long-term glycemic control (HbA1c levels) and does this predict diabetes self-care behaviours and HbA1c? Patient Educ Couns. 2010;80:227–32.CrossRef
3.
Berikai P, et al. Gain in patients’ knowledge of diabetes management targets is associated with better glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:1587–9.CrossRef
4.
Yang S, et al. Knowledge of A1c predicts diabetes self-management and A1c level among Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0150753.CrossRef
5.
Heisler M, et al. The relationship between knowledge of recent HbA1c values and diabetes care understanding and self-management. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:816–22.CrossRef
6.
Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Exe NL, Witteman HO. Numeracy and literacy independently predict patients’ ability to identify out-of-range test results. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16:e187.CrossRef
7.
Ferguson MO, et al. Low health literacy predicts misperceptions of diabetes control in patients with persistently elevated A1C. Diabetes Educ. 2015;41:309–19.CrossRef
8.
Gopalan A, et al. Translating the hemoglobin A1C with more easily understood feedback: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29:996–1003.CrossRef
9.
K. Glanz, B.K. Rimer, K. Viswanath, Health behavior : theory, research, and practice, Fifth edition. ed., 2015.
10.
Wagner EH. Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness? Eff Clin Pract. 1998;1:2–4.PubMed
11.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.CrossRef
12.
Jones H, et al. Changes in diabetes self-care behaviors make a difference in glycemic control: the diabetes stages of change (DiSC) study. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:732–7.CrossRef
13.
Gao J, et al. Effects of self-care, self-efficacy, social support on glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes. BMC Fam Pract. 2013;14:66.CrossRef
14.
Lee YY, Lin JL. The effects of trust in physician on self-efficacy, adherence and diabetes outcomes. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68:1060–8.CrossRef
15.
Grant RW, et al. Diabetes oral medication initiation and intensification: patient views compared with current treatment guidelines. Diabetes Educ. 2011;37:78–84.CrossRef
16.
Ng CJ, et al. Barriers and facilitators to starting insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Int J Clin Pract. 2015;69:1050–70.CrossRef
17.
Nielsen AB, Gannik D, Siersma V, Olivarius Nde F. The relationship between HbA1c level, symptoms and self-rated health in type 2 diabetic patients. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2011;29:157–64.CrossRef
18.
Bulpitt CJ, Palmer AJ, Battersby C, Fletcher AE. Association of symptoms of type 2 diabetic patients with severity of disease, obesity, and blood pressure. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:111–5.CrossRef
19.
Fritschi C, Quinn L. Fatigue in patients with diabetes: a review. J Psychosom Res. 2010;69:33–41.CrossRef
20.
Fritschi C, et al. Fatigue in women with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2012;38:662–72.CrossRef
21.
Holt RI, de Groot M, Golden SH. Diabetes and depression. Curr Diab Rep. 2014;14:491.CrossRef
22.
Professional Practice Committee. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2016. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(Suppl 1):S107–8.

Be confident that your patient care is up to date

Medicine Matters is being incorporated into Springer Medicine, our new medical education platform. 

Alongside the news coverage and expert commentary you have come to expect from Medicine Matters diabetes, Springer Medicine's complimentary membership also provides access to articles from renowned journals and a broad range of Continuing Medical Education programs. Create your free account »