Skip to main content
Top

04-13-2017 | Diabetic foot | Article

How common are foot problems among individuals with diabetes? Diabetic foot ulcers in the Dutch population

Journal: Diabetologia

Authors: Robert M. Stoekenbroek, Joost L.C. Lokin, Mark M. Nielen, Erik S.G. Stroes, Mark J.W. Koelemay

Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis

Contemporary data on diabetic foot ulcer prevalence are scarce. Most studies were conducted in the 1990s, reporting incidence rates of 1.9–2.6%. Since then the prevalence of diabetes has doubled and the organisation of diabetes care has undergone major changes. Up-to-date data that quantify the occurrence of diabetic foot ulcers are required and could serve as baseline measures for future studies.

Methods

Individuals with diabetes (n = 81,793) were identified from the NIVEL (Netherlands institute for health services research) Primary Care Database, which contains data for standardised routine care and is representative of the Dutch population. The annual incidence rates of ulcers and other foot abnormalities were calculated using data collected between 2010 and 2013. To account for inaccuracies, incidence rates were calculated using: (1) only individuals with a documented foot examination; (2) all individuals; and (3) individuals with explicit documentation of present/absent foot ulceration.

Results

There were 412 individuals with documented ulceration during the registration period (0.50%). The annual incidence rate of foot ulcers was 0.34% (range 0.22–1.08%). Of those individuals with a documented foot examination, 14.6% had absent pedal pulsations, 17.3% had neuropathy and 10.1% had callus/pressure marks.

Conclusions/interpretation

The annual incidence rate of foot ulcers in the current study was lower than previously reported. This observation could reflect the efficacy of screening practices and an increased awareness among professionals and patients. Nevertheless, approximately one in every five diabetic individuals had at least one identifiable risk factor on foot examination. This signifies the importance of preventive screening.
Literature
1.
Hinchliffe RJ, Andros G, Apelqvist J et al (2012) A systematic review of the effectiveness of revascularization of the ulcerated foot in patients with diabetes and peripheral arterial disease. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 28(Suppl 1):179–217CrossRefPubMed
2.
Diabetes UK (2012) Diabetes in the UK 2012. Key statistics on diabetes. Available from https://​www.​diabetes.​org.​uk/​Documents/​Reports/​Diabetes-in-the-UK-2012.​pdf. Accessed 25 Feb 2017
3.
Ramsey SD, Newton K, Blough D et al (1999) Incidence, outcomes, and cost of foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 22:382–387CrossRefPubMed
4.
Abbott CA, Carrington AL, Ashe H et al (2002) The North-West Diabetes Foot Care Study: incidence of, and risk factors for, new diabetic foot ulceration in a community-based patient cohort. Diabetic Med 19:377–384CrossRefPubMed
5.
Hurley L, Kelly L, Garrow AP et al (2013) A prospective study of risk factors for foot ulceration: the West of Ireland diabetes foot study. QJM 106:1103–1110CrossRefPubMed
6.
Muller IS, de Grauw WJ, van Gerwen WH, Bartelink ML, van den Hoogen HJ, Rutten GE (2002) Foot ulceration and lower limb amputation in type 2 diabetic patients in Dutch primary health care. Diabetes Care 25:570–574CrossRefPubMed
7.
Bakker K, Apelqvist J, Lipsky B, van Netten J, Schaper N (2016) The 2015 IWGDF guidance documents on prevention and management of foot problems in diabetes: development of an evidence-based global consensus. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 32:2–6CrossRefPubMed
8.
Bouma M, Rutten GE, de Grauw WJ, Wiersma T, Goudswaard AN (2006) Summary of the practice guideline ‘Diabetes mellitus type 2’ (second revision) from the Dutch College of General Practitioners. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 150:2251–2256PubMed
9.
Braun LR, Fisk WA, Lev-Tov H, Kirsner RS, Isseroff RR (2014) Diabetic foot ulcer: an evidence-based treatment update. Am J Clin Dermatol 15:267–281CrossRefPubMed
10.
Game FL, Hinchliffe RJ, Apelqvist J et al (2012) Specific guidelines on wound and wound-bed management 2011. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 28(Suppl 1):232–233CrossRefPubMed
11.
Saudek CD (2002) The role of primary care professionals in managing diabetes. Clinical Diabetes 20:65–66CrossRef
12.
NIVEL (2015) NIVEL Primary Care Database. Available from http://​www.​nivel.​nl/​en/​dossier/​nivel-primary-care-database. Accessed 25 Feb 2017
13.
de Sonnaville JJ, Colly LP, Wijkel D, Heine RJ (1997) The prevalence and determinants of foot ulceration in type II diabetic patients in a primary health care setting. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 35:149–156CrossRefPubMed
14.
Alonso-Morán E, Orueta JF, Esteban JI et al (2014) The prevalence of diabetes-related complications and multimorbidity in the population with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Basque Country. BMC Public Health 14:1059CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Manes C, Papazoglou N, Sossidou E et al (2002) Prevalence of diabetic neuropathy and foot ulceration: identification of potential risk factors—a population-based study. Wounds 14:11–15
16.
NHS (2017) National diabetes audit—2015–2016: report 1, care processes and treatment targets. Available from http://​www.​content.​digital.​nhs.​uk/​catalogue/​PUB23241/​nati-diab-rep1-audi-2015-16.​pdf. Accessed 25 Feb 2017

Be confident that your patient care is up to date

Medicine Matters is being incorporated into Springer Medicine, our new medical education platform. 

Alongside the news coverage and expert commentary you have come to expect from Medicine Matters diabetes, Springer Medicine's complimentary membership also provides access to articles from renowned journals and a broad range of Continuing Medical Education programs. Create your free account »