Skip to main content
Top

09-05-2018 | Blood glucose monitoring | Article

Impact of Glucose Measuring Systems and Sample Type on Diagnosis Rates of Diabetes Mellitus

Journal: Diabetes Therapy

Authors: Markus Gabriel Blaurock, Anders Kallner, Stefan Menzel, Annette Masuch, Matthias Nauck, Astrid Petersmann

Publisher: Springer Healthcare

Abstract

Introduction

The use of glucose point-of-care testing (POCT) devices for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM) is an ongoing controversy. In patient management, glucose concentrations are determined by POCT and core laboratory glucose methods, and the values are commonly compared even though the samples collected are different, namely, capillary whole blood and venous plasma. In individual patients it is difficult to distinguish between factors that can influence the results, such as sample type and measuring procedure. In this study, glucose concentrations obtained using POCT and core laboratory instruments were assessed to duplicate typical scenarios experienced in healthcare. Corresponding diagnosis rates of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and DM based on fixed, method-independent cutoffs were compared.

Methods

Glucose concentration was measured by the 2-h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in samples collected from an inpatient cohort and a cohort from the general population. Two POCT methods, namely, a handheld unit-use glucometer and a small bench-top analyzer with batch reagents, and two core laboratory procedures were used to measure glucose concentrations. The sample types were whole blood and plasma samples collected from venous and capillary blood. The glycated hemoglobin level in whole blood was also determined.

Results

A total of 231 subjects were included in the study. The 2-h OGTT glucose concentrations in the capillary whole blood samples showed a positive bias of 0.8 mmol/L compared to those obtained using core laboratory plasma glucose methods, leading to increased rates of diabetes diagnosis. This bias decreased to 0.2 mmol/L when venous blood was used in the tests. A change in the method used by the core laboratory introduced a negative bias of 0.5 mmol/L and, consequently, a lower diagnosis rates.

Discussion and Conclusion

Venous blood samples measured at the point-of-care are the most suitable sample type for the measurement of the glucose concentration in the 2-h OGTT. The investigated unit-use POCT method is suitable for the diagnosis of IGT and DM when venous blood samples are collected. Importantly, changes in measurement procedures can introduce a bias and affect diagnosis rates, thereby emphasizing the need for further harmonization of glucose methods.

Plain Language Summary

A plain language summary is available for this article.
Literature
1.
D’Orazio P, et al. Approved IFCC recommendation on reporting results for blood glucose: International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Scientific Division, Working Group on Selective Electrodes and Point-of-Care Testing (IFCC-SD-WG-SEPOCT). Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44(12):1486–90.PubMed
2.
Marathe PH, Gao HX, Close KL. American Diabetes Association standards of medical care in diabetes 2017. J Diabetes. 2017;9:320–4.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Müller-Wieland D, et al. Definition, klassifikation und diagnostik des diabetes mellitus. Diabetol Stoffwechsel. 2016;11(S02):S78–81.
4.
World Health Organization. Use of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: abbreviated report of a WHO consultation. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
5.
Schlebusch H, Sonntag O. Qualitätssicherung und Richtlinie der Bundesärztekammer zur Qualitätssicherung laboratoriumsmedizinischer Untersuchungen (RiliBÄK). Berlin: Springer; 2012. p. 391–9.
6.
Neumaier M, et al. Aktualisierte Anforderungen an die Messqualität und Qualitätssicherung (QS) von Point-of-Care-Testing (POCT)-Blutglukose-Messsystemen mit Unit-use Reagenzien, die für die Erstdiagnostik eines manifesten Diabetes in der Schwangerschaft oder eines Gestationsdiabetes mellitus (GDM) gemäß der GDM-Leitlinie der Deutschen Diabetes-Gesellschaft (DDG) geeignet sind. J Lab Med. 2015;39(4):183–6.
7.
Narayanan S. The preanalytic phase. An important component of laboratory medicine. Am J Clin Pathol. 2000;113(3):429–52.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Mahoney J, Ellison J. Assessing the quality of glucose monitor studies: a critical evaluation of published reports. Clin Chem. 2007;53(6):1122–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Volzke H, et al. Cohort profile: the study of health in Pomerania. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40(2):294–307.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Bundesärztekammer. Richtlinien der Bundesärztekammer zur Qualitätssicherung laboratoriumsmedizinischer Untersuchungen. Deutsches Ärzteblatt. 2014;111(38):A1583–618.
11.
Stahl M, et al. Optimization of preanalytical conditions and analysis of plasma glucose. 1. Impact of the new WHO and ADA recommendations on diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2001;61(3):169–79.CrossRefPubMed
12.
World Health Organization. WHO: definition and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and intermediate hyperglycaemia. Geneva: WHO; 2006.
13.
Freckmann G, Baumstark A, Pleus S. Do the new FDA guidance documents help improving performance of blood glucose monitoring systems compared with ISO 15197? J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017;11(6):1240–6. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​1932296817713220​.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Kuwa K, et al. Relationships of glucose concentrations in capillary whole blood, venous whole blood and venous plasma. Clin Chim Acta. 2001;307(1–2):187–92.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Thennadil SN, et al. Comparison of glucose concentration in interstitial fluid, and capillary and venous blood during rapid changes in blood glucose levels. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2001;3(3):357–65.CrossRefPubMed

Be confident that your patient care is up to date

Medicine Matters is being incorporated into Springer Medicine, our new medical education platform. 

Alongside the news coverage and expert commentary you have come to expect from Medicine Matters diabetes, Springer Medicine's complimentary membership also provides access to articles from renowned journals and a broad range of Continuing Medical Education programs. Create your free account »